Talk:Ghislaine Maxwell
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghislaine Maxwell article. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
This article is about a person who is alive, and so it must follow our rules for biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons that does not have any sources or is poorly sourced must be removed straight away from the article and its talk page, especially if it harms their reputation. If such content is repeatedly added to the page or if there are other concerns related to this rule, report it on the Administrators' noticeboard. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information. |
Discussions on this page may turn into heated arguments. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. ( no personal attacks · assume good faith · be kind ) |
Daily article pageviews | |
Graphs do not work. You can go to the graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org.
|
Final verdict
[change source]As of 2021-December-30 there is no final verdict. One point is that she [still] has not used up her possibilities for appeal [1]. 89.8.116.109 (talk) 21:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- She already appealed the charges.[1][2] But this stuff does not belong in the lede anyways. Mwiqdoh (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Your sources do not say that the appeal (or petition for an appeal), has been delivered yet. 89.8.140.61 (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- It does say however that,
Her family said they had commenced the appeal process.
which means saying, "she can still appeal" is useless and outdated. Mwiqdoh (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- It does say however that,
- Your sources do not say that the appeal (or petition for an appeal), has been delivered yet. 89.8.140.61 (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Appeal process and family POV (from English wiki)
[change source]This is what English wiki says: "Her family said they had [... started] the appeal process.[3][4]". We might want to say something similar. 89.8.140.61 (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Painting a picture of guilt etc? (Accused of crime - thereafter closing down an enterprise one week later)
[change source]"Maxwell founded the ocean-advocacy group The TerraMar Project in 2012. The organization announced it was closing on 12 July 2019, a week after the sex trafficking charges brought by New York federal prosecutors against Epstein became public."
All the stuff is probably true, but I feel this text is not neutral. Please change the text - it would take a lot, to make the whole sentence more loaded than it is. 89.8.136.23 (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- ↑ "Ghislaine Maxwell's family begin appeal process after sex abuse verdict". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ↑ "Ghislaine Maxwell's family launch appeal after sex abuse verdict". The Independent. 30 December 2021. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ↑ "Ghislaine Maxwell's family begin appeal process after sex abuse verdict". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ↑ "Ghislaine Maxwell's family launch appeal after sex abuse verdict". The Independent. 30 December 2021. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.