Talk:Resultant force
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Resultant force article. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Good?
[change source]Is all information correct? If yes, then please add the information to the English article because I could not understand at all when I looked at the English article.— This unsigned comment was added by User:Qwertyxp2000 (talk • changes) on 07:30, 23 July 2014.
- If the article here is more understandable than the same article at the English Wikipedia, then we're doing something right. But this is a stub and hopefully will still grow into an article. As it is now, there is only one statement in the article, followed by an example. Is the statement correct? Yes, according to the source citation—which, in fact, is the proof the statement is correct. With the added benefit of other reliable edits, there may be more to copy to the enwiki article at some point. But thank you for the good suggestion Rus793 (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)