You have been blocked from changing Wikipedia for 31 hours for unable to agree with other editors. If you do not agree with this block, please reply on your talk page by adding {{unblock|reason}}, replacing reason with why you think the block is wrong. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply.
. You have repeatedly insisted on replacing the Life of Pablo page despite editors telling you it was not notable as a separate page. You have taken no notice, and never addressed the basic issue of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Request reason(s):
This has got to be one of the most absurd blocks ever. You clearly didn't fully see what happened so let me run through it. I made a new article called The Life of Pablo about said album. The user Auntof6 reverted it saying that my article didn't prove its notability. This went back and forth a couple times in a mini edit war style. I then made a version of the article with referencing. Auntof6 said this on his own talkpage: "Thanks for the additions. The part about debuting at number one on the Billboard chart shows notability. Now it just needs some categories. Let me know if you'd like help figuring out what categories to use." That was on 17th August. So this issue was resolved a day before this block. So please enlighten me about how I've "taken no notice" when I evidently had a discussion with him regarding the article, and please also explain how I've "never addressed the basic issue of notability" when my version of the article has been said to prove notability by the guy who originally reverted it. Also, I saw that you changed the perfectly notable version of the article back to a redirect to Kanye West which was reverted back to my version by Auntof6. This means he disagrees with your decision. This block is completely unfair and invalid. Wackslas (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
I have taken a look at the article history, and agree that the original block was unwarranted. You may also find {{inuse}} useful in your future editing. ChenzwTalk09:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked at your edits on My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. Please, please, please do not remove links just because they are red. Those are usually pages that should be created. When they are red it can encourage people to create the article. Plus when the article is created it is already linked to other pages so we don't have an Orphan. I'm going to revert your edits to get things back to normal. Plus your addition of background is complex. If you have any questions, please let me know. And I'm really sorry to undo your work. --Tbennert (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
