Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2024/June/Notdone

NOT DONE:

Discussion moved to the 2nd request

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:Cactusisme

Cactusisme (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I am an active anti-vandalism counter and I frequently check recent changes. I mainly use twinkle/undo. I would like to request rollback so that I could revert vandalism faster. I am familiar with all the rules/regulations of rollback. Thank you.--Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator, and I have no power to assign or revoke permissions from your account, but I would like to note that this user is a sockpuppet of a sockpuppeter who has engaged in sockpuppetry at least 7 times, possibly as recently as today. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the sockpuppetry was on the English Wikipedia. You may want to see the list of confirmed sockpuppets, their talk page, or the sockpuppet investigations. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that, I have learned from my mistakes. It has been almost a month since the incident. Now I only use this brand-new account. The others have not been active for more than a month. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have committed sockpuppetry in the past 12 days (if not sooner) and uses the other accounts in the past 11 days (if not sooner). @Cactusisme Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I was only appealing my ban Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your most recent edit I would clearly not appealing any block:[1] @Cactusisme

Also appealing a ban is using an alternative account... Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And if you think I have used any other accounts, please feel free to check. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no way of checking, and besides, I doubt this would qualify for checkuser. There's a swath of space between "I'm going to use a tool to reveal private information to check" and "I am not willing to give you more stuff that could potentially be used to cause damage".@Cactusisme Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please free feel to check my other accounts on this Wikipedia/EN wiki to see if they have made a edit Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could have made a new account...but thats not the point. Again, I can't actually do anything here, but I personally would not even consider granting this until there has been at least 1 month without further sockpuppetry. @Cactusisme Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I will remove it. Sorry for wasting your time. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 00:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Me Da Wikipedian, please leave it to administrators to make comments on these types of requests. Administrators do already keep editors' past history in mind before granting rollback and patroller, as well as reviewing current activity to fully assess whether it's appropriate to grant the right to the editor. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 21:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I was told already. @Ferien Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.