Jump to content

User talk:79.43.66.123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

79.43.66.123 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Please unblock me. I just did some edits in "Kronk's New Groove", but since I've evaded the block somebody reverted my changes and then you blocked me again. I would never let this happen again. The block is not necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and then I will just do some good contributions. I don't think my block is fair because I wanna edit Wikipedia again. If you do not unblock me, I'll just wait for the block to expire. Once I'm unblocked, I can finally revert back that change.

Decline reason:

unblock denied, no good reason-- fr33kman 16:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(I am not an administrator, and have no power to block or unblock you but...) In other words, you're essentially saying, I know I committed block evasion, and someone reverted me, but I think I was right even though everyone else is telling me I'm right. Your arguement for unblock is I want to edit and I will continue being disruptive (reverting to your prefered version) and will do so anyway when my block expires. I doubt this will be accepted. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]