From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fr33kman.
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Fr33kman, where you can send messages and comments to Fr33kman.
1. Be polite to everyone conversing here. 2. Assume good faith! I don't make changes here in bad faith, ever! 3. I'm a nice guy, so talk to me rather than lecture me. 4. Post ALL new messages to me BELOW all the other messages and NOT at the top of the page (same for ALL user's talk pages) 5. Don't use my talk page for social chats with me. Email me instead!
Please review the deletion process because the page is about a famous human rights activist and writer, and I have included many links that prove this matter.
Since I was here.. The Wikidata was pointed to the wrong article. I fixed that. I also moved the page the Derna, Libya and cleaned up the inbound links. None were to the river, but there was one to place in Romania. The main page should need to be either the most common name or a disambig page, but Ill leave that as a redirect for now. Pure Evil (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate, but I have been in the position here already for a spell (as well as others) and have no interest in doing it again. There are only rare times it could be useful but I just toss those up for others (to often ignore.. but oh well, I did my part) Pure Evil (talk) 23:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I've missed a few, but I've usually gone back and signed them although I might have missed a couple. Getting back into the swing of things :) fr33kman09:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, remember to remove the in progress template and the tags around it. That was one of the reasons the count was out of synch earlier. Thanks! -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant is this: [1] as Ferien did, which only restored the revisions up to 08:25, 19 August 2023 and left out the vandalism (which seems to be all from one person under different IPs) and the reversions of this vandalism. Kk.urban (talk) 16:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appeared to have covered it, if you hovered your cursor over the history button you could click on it. That is what I did. :) fr33kman16:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at WP:AN. Message added 11:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The article was being edited when you suddenly deleted it. The citations are from Google scholar making it WP:GNG and already has had an entry on other Wikis going back years. I don't know what you're doing. Serener (talk) 23:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I put in citations as required and these are third party citations besides 2 from the founder itself. I ensured to keep out promotional stuff and had numerous citations arguing the opposite. How do you suddenly delete a fully cited article without discussion? It's beyond me.--Serener (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can add hundreds of citations without explaining HOW it is notable. Citations from the founder are not neutral and not reliable. What notable alumni has there been, what MAJOR awards has the school received. What has been written abut it in newspapers, journals, books, TV programmes etc... fr33kmanfr33kman00:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It really should be pointed out that Serener has been a contributor to the En. wiki article you point out is a well written article about a notable school (the school that is the subject of this article under construction). Their contributions to that article go back to 2019 with no administrative actions and only a welcome message on their talk page. Not coming across as a trouble maker. Pure Evil (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Never claimed they were a trouble maker, only that the article as it was made on this wiki did not meet A4. That's why I pointed it out to them and how to change it to fit our needs. fr33kman01:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which they said they were doing ("The article was being edited ") when you deleted it only 5 minutes after its creation (23:49, October 5, 2023 from 23:44, October 5, 2023). Just saying, you could have given them a little more time to address the issues. especially as it does seem they were not given the opportunity for a wait template between it being tagged, them being alerted to the issue and your deletion of the article. Pure Evil (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was no QD tag placed, I simply deleted it. There was no {{in progress}} template and the entire aricle was 90% about the founder and her life with no mention of anything claiming notability. If they were a major author of the enwiki article they could have brought it over in a much better format than the disorganised mess it was in. When I create an article I don't do it in bits and pieces, I keep working and pressing preview until I'm 90% happy with it. Then I save it. If an in progress template was placed this could all have been avoided. fr33kman02:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you bothered looking at the sources, you'd see there is much more than the subject itself and the majority were secondary sources, mostly critical of the subject but from an academic perspective. Instead of messaging me or raising objections on the talk page or reading through the sources, you got trigger-happy and just deleted all that hardwork. It must be more fun hitting the deletion button than making an effort to bring up any legit objections -none of which there were if anyone bothered to check. No wonder Wikipedia has the reputation it does.--Serener (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've compared it to the enwiki version and there seems to be no difference. I'm not an expert with wiki markup language so I'd ask someone else if I were you; perhaps eptalon, Vermont, or Auntof6. Or else ask someone from another project like dungodung etc... Good luck. :) fr33kman00:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page in your user space was using the box template with two depreciated parameters. This caused the template to place the page in an error category and to not display the information at all. Being it is the page of an active user, rather than just fixing the issue, I informed you of what was causing both proplegs on your page as well as what was needed to be done to correct the error and display problem. Pure Evil (talk) 01:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, now it makes more sense. I'll look into it. It's odd though how nobody had told me about it until now. I've had the same basic pages since 2008. Thx fr33kman01:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm still not seeing what the problem is. Am I miss using the {{box}} template somewhere? Because I'm not seeing it. Can you please point out the exact problem? fr33kman01:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
┌─────────────────────────────────┘ Ok, I've got it now. Thanks for pointing it out. Old brain just wasn't seeing what you meant. I've deleted the page now. fr33kman02:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I left a !vote on the AFD after I went through the sources and did some other digging. Biggest (not at all) shock was that the page was created on EN as well, multiple times, and always deleted as a G5 [2] with the creator being part of the Amansharma111 sock farm. I had also tagged Ujjawal Trivedi here as G11 (which you deleted and thank you!), but got to wondering and to no surprise, it's been created multiple times on EN and deleted as G5 as created by a sock of Amansharma111 - [3]. Think it's worth having a CU check if the two accounts here are related, plus any other accounts or just not worry about it? Ravensfire (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 21:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
I'm wondering, do you see any improvement in this change? [4] It seems to have just made the text more complex, but maybe there's some corrections I'm missing? Kk.urban (talk) 23:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's no justification to delete this for "A4: The page is about a person, group, company, product or website, and does not claim notability". There was an RFD for it, so can't you delete it for that reason? Kk.urban (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I hope you are well. I have created a page name "Ario Nahavandi"
and I used Language check Ai to make sure the context is in "Simple English" Format, but you have deleted the page.
Another thing that was mentioned was notability, which I can understand as I carefully followed the "General notability guidelines" page to address the context and biography.
Do you mind to tell me which part should to be edit or fixed then I can do it to get the page published?
I took a look at the deleted page and it seems to me that you would need to have more references that support his notability. Right now there aren't enough sources that are independent, well-known, (i.e.:major national or international) , have a neutral point of view and have no conflict of interest. Well known national newspaper would be a good start. Well known magazines like Rolling Stone would also help establish his notability. If he was to be signed to a well-known record label this would make him notable on its own. I hope this helps, fr33kman18:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, I will try to gather more recourses. Could you please tell me how i can return the page back to edit the references? it has been deleted, or should i just create a new page? thanks Alanwhite12 (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 22:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Hi fr33kman, I hope you're well, Regarding Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Kendra Lust; WP:ITSNOTABLE isn't a valid for keeping and whilst the subject does have articles on other projects it was deemed on EN (whom are very stringent) that she wasn't notable and as such was deleted there,
Also Eptalon hasn't provided any evidence of any notability - Pure Evil gave a valid reason for deletion and it's the Keepers job to counteract deletion claims with a valid reason to keep with proof which imho was not done,
Looking at it in a neutral way PureEvil's comment held the most weight and he provided more than just "Delete - Not notable" which is what Eptalon's !vote basically is,
Would you maybe reconsider your closure please ?, If not I'll head over to DRV but thought I'd ask first, Have a pleasant weekend fr33kman :),
Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk23:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I did my own research and did not rely on Eptalon's alone. The consensus was 50:50 for "reasons" so I did a tie-break and did the research myself and decided to keep. Please do take it to DRV if you feel otherwise. Thx :) fr33kman23:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay brilliant, Could I further ask what research or what sources made you go with !keep?, I'm simply trying to better understand the reasoning behind it as you may have seen or found things I haven't or you may be aware of certain policies that I'm not, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk23:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, apart from passing NACTOR which can be used to contribute to GNG there was the number of products that have been created using her persona such as a journal, posters, and other such material is not created for nobodies; the fact that ChatGPT knows who she is; articles in reliable sources that mention her[5],[6],Rolling Stone etc...; Being in The UK Sun; Many articles in Sportskeeda; Being charged by the US SEC[7] (that is in the news); and the sheer number of videos she's in, amongst other stuff that are on loads of other websites, and that's she's on other Wikipedia's, led me to believe she meets GNG. It's a straw that broke the camel's back scenario. There is just too much mention of her for her not to be notable. Hope this helps! :) fr33kman01:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Many thanks for providing sources and for your analysis on this, I can now understand your closure and I actually partially agree with it, As she's not on EN I don't fully agree with it but you make some valid points and you have done due diligence in researching this and leaving your feedback which I appreciate a lot,
Done. Thank you for using my talk page as it pings my phone so I know that there is something I must do. It's often the fastest way of contacting me. Cheer! :) fr33kman21:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman, Hello, I'm Aviram7 and I request for rollback features, because I have rollback right on metawiki, enwiki, hiwiki, Currently I working on different wiki to reduce spam and vandalism also,sometimes make difficulties to revert on simple wiki from Swviewer,if you feel comfort about my request, so please grant me rollback right for temporary first. Kind regards AviramNoSurprisesPlease12:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please ask for rollback on the RfP page. It looks though like you are a new user here. We only normally give rollback to established users. fr33kman14:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman, Thanks for reply ; Yep! I was joined simple english wiki last 2 year ago, but I don't active here before, but I currently active in reverting vandalism on this wiki,if I make a second time request on RfP, but i don't think any admin accept my request if i made . AviramNoSurprisesPlease18:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not. Why don't you keep reverting vandalism with undo and wait for a couple of months. After such time, ask me again and I'll b happy to grant rollback to you. fr33kman18:06, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've reconsidered and your use of the undo button is causing you extra time and effort. Therefore, I have granted you rollback. Thanks fr33kman12:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman, Hello, I really thankful to you, and also thanks for granting me for rollback , I'm always trying to given postive contributions on simple wiki. but I was maded a request on RfP in past, sorry for about that and thanks a lot for that. Kind regards AviramNoSurprisesPlease13:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the dumbest thing I've seen. People are edit warring over a pointless fact that Steven Crowder drinks dog semen. The source links back to a Reddit page with an obviously photoshopped Youtube screenshot. 174.71.244.91 (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's frequent Vandalism in page 1984, the IP looks like an american hater since most of names he's removing are Americans ; So either block that IP, or maybe protect the page...
This user was blocked by English Wikipedia admin Secretlondon for he is a ja sockpuutery of Genshin Impact Vandalism users (check-user confirmed),
He is active in Simple English Wikipedia!
You can have a look at this user's Central Auth Infomation [8] if you don't trust me. I know it's hard to believe but we have checked this user and results support it!
Fr33kman, Korail7409 recently has been the main target of Genshin LTA. This LTA made so many impersonation accounts or similar user name accounts of Korail7409, this is evident mis-block. This 37.235 is also frequent Genshin LTA IP. LR0725 (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did this guy make any "one strike"? WP:ONESTRIKE says user blocked indefinitely can be just blocked in Simple English Wikipedia only by one rule-breaking, but I think Korail7409 did not commit any rule breaking here... LR0725 (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A user blocked on another project can be blocked here with or without the onstrike. I found this edit to be unhelpful and the fact that they were blocked on enwiki for sockpupperty made me decide to block. Is there a specific reason you feel they should not be blocked? I'm willing to review. fr33kman16:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Surely. Korail7409 is jawiki extendedconfirmed user, and attacked by that Genshin LTA for long time. You can see that in many sock accounts' edits in many wikimedia projects. Maybe like history of User talk:Korail7409? Korail7409 is just a LTA victim. LR0725 (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide a measure that could help determine whether an academic is notable, particularly in a non-Anglophone country with a different media ecosystem? I've heard people talk about some index related to how often people cite them. Kk.urban (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a case-by-case basis. I've read what enwiki has to say about the subject and I suppose that could be used as a guideline. fr33kman17:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 13:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
I have addressed your comments on the "Made You Look" nomination at PGA. I was hoping you could revisit and consider supporting.--NØ22:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The devil does not come so fast when we think about him, as you come fast on the page. :-) Dear @Fr33kman I created Logan Keith Williams page two times. First time you delete it immediately, I could only see QD A4. Second time I created talk page first and mentioned that in my opinion how this subject is notable, you deleted also talk page with page. It is my request, please restore page, talk page and initiate an RfD. If community votes for delete. I myself nominate this for delete. Thanks. J.FlanaG (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but the subject is not notable. You must show why and how the person deserves a page on Wikipedia. I read the page and determined that it was not notable. Sorry if this upsets you, it's not personal. :) fr33kman21:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After reviewing the page I've decided to undelete it and send it to RfD. You did state why the subject should be considered notable so I'm happy to undelete it. Good luck! :) fr33kman21:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has requested deletion of Testing rfd, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. fr33kman07:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
just wanted to let you know that I closed it as a keep.So when you have a little time, can you cross-check for accuracy? - If you add/change something, try keeping the language simple... - Cheers. Eptalon (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw you close it. I'll get on it tonight. Thanks! BTW: did you suppress that Imgpflip page? If so I'll recreate the article under proterction. Thx! fr33kman20:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just checked you did it. Thanks buddy, I'll recreate it as a stub and leave it protected. It had some vile vandalism to go with the oversight stuff. Where people get their ideas from I'll never know! Thanks dude! :) fr33kman20:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 22:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Hello, I’d like to report a concerning user User:柏尾菓子. SHE WAS BLOCKED by en admin JBW DUE TO VANDALISM IN GENSHIN AND BAD EDITING! Here is the CA
[9]
This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
09:17, 2 November 2023 JBW talk contribs blocked 柏尾菓子 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopaedia)
(Non-administrator observation) I recommend ignoring this request. The user who made the request is globally locked. User:柏尾菓子 is an admin and bureaucrat on Japanese Wikipedia and their block on enwiki seems to be a mistake. Their only edits on enwiki were to tell others to stop discussing Japanese Wikipedia business on enwiki. Kk.urban (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2 added points: the RfD say Apache Wave was QD'd as A7. A3, maybe? there is no A7 after all. (the other was a3 or G7, I said A7 by mistake.. my bad) And you never actually deleted the page. Pure Evil (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Each version of Wikipedia chooses their own logo. The Simple English Wikipedia has chosen the one you see and has had it for almost 17 years. We like it. You are free to start another discussion on WP:ST to see if people want to update it, but we'll likely keep it. Hope this helps! fr33kman12:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey i was not asking about the official Wikipedia logos, i was asking about local article related logos such as Logo of Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades that's available on En wiki which you can see here; but it can't be uploaded here, though, i learned about it from your second answer. Thanks Faraz Sualeh (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
About once a year, I ask the community whether or not we want to allow the local uploading of images here. So far it's a 3-0 lose. I can ask again shortly. Best I can do. If you can see a picture on the Arabic wikipedia but can't use it here, it is because it must be uploaded locally on the Arabic wikipedia and not on commons. fr33kman17:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The main reason you can only see your logo on arwiki is that nether commons nor simplewiki allows the use of copyrighted images (ie: non-free images). fr33kman17:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'd flagged that one as "some or all" being untrue as it was apparently created by a sock of en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Oatsandcream. They've created the same page on enwiki in the past and it's been deleted.
Fair enough if you've checked it out, but this user has also been misrepresenting sources at the Humor Risk article here. They seem to enjoy embellishing stories about lost media. Belbury (talk) 15:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I would like to undergo an unblocking process on simple English. I will not specify my identity right away. All I will say is that you are the user who undertook my blocking, and before I start, I would like to have your consent. Cheers! Oh you guessed it (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you have access to your talkpage then you can ask for an unblock there. Showing up here with a sockpuppet doesn't look good btw. fr33kman18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then just start editing with the account you have now. If you want to reveal your past account you can but it may end up with you being blocked straight away depending on which account it was. You can email me the name if you wish but I can't promise it still wouldn't be blocked. If you are after a fresh start just keep the current account and start editing. fr33kman18:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there @Fr33kman I really don’t understand what you mean by the page I created does not claim notability. If I may ask what makes this page non notable? After been retrieving sources from Google news and you still says this page doesn’t meet notability. I really don’t get you. Please if you want somethings to be changed just undelete it so I can change it thanks. Gudwise (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your page does not show what the person has done to be considered as notable (famous) enough to have an article here. What major national/international awards have they been awarded. How many citations in major newspapers, magazines do they have etc. Please read WP:GNG for more information. fr33kman03:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So do you mean News Ghana[10] is not a reliable/independent source ? Do you mean MENAFN is not a reliable/independent source and what about GhanaWeb[11] too?
I actually did quite a bit more research on this one than normal. I can't find reliable sources. Those are sources that are available on the Internet, are cited in other reliable sources like other websites (who are themselves RS) and well-known national or international newspapers, journals and magazine. Being mentioned on the national or international news helps establish RS and N. CNN, Al-Jazeera, The Times of India etc., are all reliable sources as long as the subject is the main topic of the piece and not just mentioned as a 2 second side-line. I am, at the moment, researching a page that would list the major RS of India, Pakistan and South-East Asia asI don't think we have good enough coverage for this area of the world. fr33kman13:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You only have 42 edits on this project and have only been active since 04/12/2023. Keep editing and work on reverting vandalism and I'll be happy to grant rollback after a month of activity. Welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia and Happy Editing! :) fr33kman19:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The man disappears for the better part from a decade, and just reappears out of no where. And yet, no text, no email. Nothing. I feel disrespected. lol jk. But seriously though. We need to catch up old friend. Either add me on facebook, X, or email me and let’s catch up, bro. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp03:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I do know I tend to be more strict on these than many editors, but I thought the recent ones were pretty clear cut. For example, in María Josepha Sophia de Iturbide, every sentence is an exact word-for-word copy paste from EnWP. Not a word was changed. They editor just copied sentences and left others out. Short is not simpler, right? No attribution. What they didn't copy was references, making the article worse than the En version. Would you reconsider the QDs? Or, should I take them to RfD? I'd prefer not to clog up the Discussed Deletion queue any more than it is. Thanks, --Gotanda (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When I reviewed them I thought that your reasoning was that they were an exact word-for-word copy of a copy of sentences. Then I saw that they had been changed a little and felt that perhaps your thinking was that there was no attribution. Copyright law permits an exact word-for-word copy without attribution of one or two sentences without falling foul of the law. I added the attribution and declined the QDs. Since you've explained what your thinking was more clearly I am happy to delete them. FYI, When I see articles created like these were, where fixing them would be quick and easy, I prefer to just quickly fix them them rather than delete them but I support your right to ask for a QD instead. Cheers! :) fr33kman01:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser. Message added 03:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello @Fr33kman i am writing this message for a checkuser Request against @Cyber.Eyes.2005 i have created a article today Pradeep Kumaar Yadav and this editor placed a QD template with a reason of blocked user this is not fare. and then a check his account and i found that he is already blocked in English Wikipedia due to horrible Sock Puppetry [[12]] i want your help sir please help me you dont think so why any editor edits pages continuously 10-12 hours daily. i think he is doing all this for Wikipedia Rights of Rollback please consider my request i beg to you. 203.115.91.125 (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You sir it will really helpful but sir @Cyber.Eyes.2005 Still unblocked. i am sure these are socks of @Cyber.Eyes.2005 because after his/her edits suddenly actives and revert all my changes that i have done against him. think about this matter why any random person will arrive and reverts all changes that i have done against him. and with his past records its clear that he may be using multiple accounts also this time again. because in English Wikipedia he is blocked because of horrible sock puppetry. 203.115.91.125 (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Respected editor @Fr33kman i am here to bring your attention on @Dotdashmeredith I think he is doing sock puppetry on Simple English Wikipedia. I have seen he is Doing disruptive edits here and placing Random deletation tags on articles. He Creates a article Poybo Media which is created by a Sock on English Wikipedia[13] he is also Blocked on Wikidata[14] and Cr.wikipedia.org[15] . I Dont think he is here for a good reason. After reviewing his Editing style i am conformed he is here for recreating the deleted and blocked article from English Wikipedia. please Check this User and revert his all bad changes from Wikipedia, i tried to reverts his changes but he always doing Undo so i request you to see this matter Thanks in advance Simonsmichel (talk) 07:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are clearly targeting my work, and are sockpuppeting with multiple accounts to delete my QD nominations. I have already dealt with my past sockpuppeting with the administrators, and we have resolved that I will only use this account to make constructive edits. dotdashmeredith(talk)07:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I marked a number of articles for QD that I strongly believe do not meet notability.
A brand new user, under an IP came and reverted all my QD nominations without reason. I warned them on their talk page, but they did not stop. Then they QD nominated articles I created without reason.
The IP user stopped, and then a new Simonsmichel began repeating the same. Simonsmichel faked a global rollbacker role, likely to appear more authentic. This succession is evident of a sockpuppet.
Simonsmichel began threatening on multiple Wikipedia threads.
Fr33kman, just take a glance at the articles I nominated for deletion. They clearly make sense.
Because you are targeting specific people (mostly people who have been blocked on enwiki for socking)... Seems like you are attacking them? RiggedMint18:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no sir i am not targeting them i am not very much experienced like you and other senior editors. i just compare their editing style, way of editing and supporting each other and Recreating same article which is already deleted because of Sock Puppetry and now when @Fr33kman unblocked @Cyber.Eyes.2005 after few minuets @Dotdashmeredith came and request for unblock. and a brand new account Requests for de-checkusership/Fr33kman raised voice against him. is this normal according to you @RiggedMint sir. Simonsmichel (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems pretty normal because both were blocked pretty much at the same time, They don't have the same IP, they even have different CU cases back in enwiki. RiggedMint19:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not related to any one of those users mentioned. @Simonsmichel is a sockpuppet, after their VPN IP reverted my QD nominatinos without reason, Simonsmichel began to do the same (faking their global rollback role). The articles I nominated do not meet QD. Then Simonsmichel began to threaten me, and reported me on multiple Wikipedia threads for no reason. dotdashmeredith(talk)19:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman, would you mind a quick CU check on Simonmichel to see if they are a Amansharma111 sock. Their Simanchal Panda page has all of the hallmarks of an A111 article - over-the-top promotional tone, lots of unsourced awards, junk "world record" from pay-for-play award groups. I think there's a fair number of sleepers out there, unfortunately, as they like to do a new account every other article or so. I'd be glad to put all of this in the RFCU entry if you'd prefer. Ravensfire (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article Bangkok Post, has been deleted.--Not sure who started the article, but I simplified it.--If you or anyone else can take a second look at that very short article, or stub, then fine.--Please consider having it republished, as it was at the point when the name of the sports editor was removed from the infobox.--By the way, I did not Q.C. the full address in the infobox. Thanks, ~~~~ 2001:2020:347:C043:B5A3:7C88:31C5:75D7 (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Respected Editor @Fr33kmanOperator873 i am forced to text you here a user a user in Simple English Wikipedia doing mass Quick Delete tags on Indian Wikipedia Articles frequently @Dotdashmeredith[16] here i mentioned his username i have raised voice against him but no once cares about this user @Dotdashmeredith already blocked on English Wikipedia because on Sock Puppetry [17] also blocked on cr.wikipedia.org[18] and Also blocked on Wikidata[19] and now doing mass delete on Simple English Wikipedia[20]. He is also Doing Paid edits according to me, He creates Poybo Media on Simple English Wikipedia and this article is also creates on English Wikipedia but now article is deleted on English Wikipedia Because of Sock Puppetry. You can check the references [21] And He tried to create Same article on Every Wikipedia [22] Justin Jin [23] . Two Articles Justin Jin and Poybo Media he tried to create every time. i beg to you thats why i am messaging you on Meta-Wikipedia because no one hereing me on Simple English Wikipedia. i am trusting you and respect you thats why i am here in your talk page please do the needful. Bathew Mads Fomo (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
I see that you have been active without responding to the Commission. Do you intend to respond? If you do not respond promptly, the Commission will decide the case against you without your input. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fr33kman, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing,
–Davey2010Talk15:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 03:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Hi Fr33kman. Hope you are doing well. I am from EN wiki [24]. This message is regarding the User:SaneFlint who is blocked for abusivly using multiple accounts(socking) in EN wiki, here is the link to the Sockpuppet investigation. SaneFlint has created the article Pir Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi on EN Wiki, which is currently in the AfD: [25]. I'd like to clarify that User:SaneFlint assumed User:Rathura Jemican was me here on Simple Wiki: [26], even though I don't have any other accounts. This is my first edit on Simple Wiki. You can check my global contributions, I am a new page reviewer in En wiki and have been only editing there majorly. After SaneFlint's ban on EN Wiki, they seem to have shifted here to create similar articles that were deleted on the EN wiki. I discovered their activity here while checking where this image was being used. Feel free to disregard this message if Simple Wiki policies differ from those on EN Wiki or if SaneFlint hasn't violated any guidelines here. Cheers. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Fr33kman i noticed that you deleted the page J Merlin. I think this artist has the potential to be notable. I always come across something new about this artist including information from news. He is verified on social media, music platforms and has a knowledge panel. Is there any possibility you can reconsider J Merlin? Maybe you can the deletion of the page and I will gather extra information that you think is required Christoffheaney (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, hope your new year is going well so far. Currently on flood so don't want to be adjusting any blocks that might not be seen in RC. Do you think it would be a good idea to have a {{UsernameBlocked}} for Amazemedia? (Amazemedia sounds a bit like a company name) --Ferien (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 06:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 13:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Please reopen this RfD. It had not been open for a week yet, so hadn't got the chance to get all the potential comments, but even if it had been, RfDs with no comments are treated as WP:SOFTDELETEs. --Ferien (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 20:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi! I noticed your block of them was only for a week. They've been globally locked (not by me) at this point, having continued their cross-wiki socking (namely with Tester85) and spam after multipleagreements not to. There's basically no chance they get unblocked, and I'm wondering if you'd be okay if we change the local block to indefinite for procedural purposes. I.e., if they appeal in the future we can treat Dotdashcomma as the "master" and they'd appeal that account's block, as opposed to the block of one of the many socks. Best, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 03:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi :) I noticed my recent newly created article was deleted as I was working on it. Subject is very much notable and I was working on it maybe you can undelete it? I will add resources it will be easier to confirm its notability. Subject was part of Sindh Khilafat Movement and Reshi Rumal Tehrik known as Silk Letter Conspiracy ): SaneFlint (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My advice to you (like it is to everyone) is make it easier on the admins by firstly not publishing an article until it is in a fit state to be on the project by making sure it is at least 50%-75% finished and has a) reliable sources and b) makes an actual claim of notability. This means telling us WHY he subject deserves a page in an encyclopedia. I've created lots of articles myself and have never had one deleted because I follow this advice and don't press "Publish" until it is finished or almost finished. I will undelete this article for you but I expect to see a claim of notability and some citations from reliable secondary or tertiary sources TODAY. Thx, :) fr33kman20:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Fr33kman - you may have received one or more email messages from the deranged stalker that has afflicted this and other projects for many years. (The account I just reported at Meta, spoofing your name, had email enabled; whenever that is the case, he's sending threats.) I encourage you to forward anything you get to Wikimedia Legal. We're working on something to put a permanent end to this. Thanks - Antandrus (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you delete the article if you knew that there was a discussion about its permanence on Wikipedia? In addition, you deleted sources. I ask that you restore it again. Your action is arbitrary. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Dhruv_Sharma 190.219.223.166 (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored it. I did not violate policy, as an admin I can decide to use quick deletion if it fits. I decided it was deletable under QDA4. fr33kman21:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You use Category:PageName in the search box and then press publish. You then add the cat name to pages you want to add to the cat. Hope this helps, if not ask Rathfelder :) fr33kman18:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fr33kman, Can you grant Rollback rights on my alternative account because I have already rollback right on enwiki, Sometimes I edit from our alternate account to revert vandalism, If you feel confortable, so, please grant me this permission:) Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)09:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fr33kman, Thanku for reply, I known you granted already rollbacker rights on my main account but I say can you add rollback flag on alternate account ;please see here; if you adding rollback flag on my alternate account, so, I'll feel very happy :) Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)03:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please restore this article. Your reason for deletion on the last one was already invalid, as no RfD had occurred, but deleting it again with no reason once it had already been restored – either not reading the history or choosing to ignore other admins' actions – is worse. --Ferien (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't really the issue - it was deleted numerous times for other issues, and you chose to delete it twice despite it having reasonable content in these latest revisions. Nevertheless, I appreciate you restoring it. --Ferien (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 It was requested 3x by another user. I posted it here because this editor deleted the page. There are quite a lot of requests on WP:AN in which page protection has been requested and no admin has taken action. Again, please look at things before you post. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!03:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: If you think requests on the admins' noticeboard aren't getting action, consider that fewer admins will see a request on a talk page so it might be even less likely to get action. There may be a reason no action is taken on requests -- you can always ask. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd appreciate it if you could refrain from deleting articles when other admins have already declined QDs, as you have done on Mortoza Polash just now and at #Skibidi Toilet and #Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Hacktivist Vanguard above. As an admin, you are supposed to be checking the history before deleting the article. This is not optional and is mentioned specifically in the QD template. This has already been mentioned to you multiple times on this talk page alone but despite this, it seems you still are either not checking the history or purposefully overriding other admins' actions without explanation – neither is acceptable. I'm going to assume good faith that you just aren't checking the history, but if that is the case, you should be reviewing QD requests closer in future. --Ferien (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. I suggest that the Simple English Wikipedia articles for Generation X, Millennial, Generation Z, and Generation Alpha follow the same guidelines as those from the main English site. Admins there have concluded with only allowing official government citations and certain key institutions such as Pew Research to filter out disruptive editing and vandalism, and to provide a factual reading experience. Much of the edits in these Simple Wikipedia articles have dubious citations, with bad-faith statements (examples include edits stating that Pew ends Gen X at 1979; both citations in the Generation Alpha page state 2013 as the start date, yet editors falsely edit the sentence to state 2012; and the false statement that there are many governmental sources that have 1996-2011 as the Gen Z date range, when this isn't the case). There are multiple citations that come from irrelevant sources (which will allow editors to put any date range they choose, thus pointing out the bias problem). I have already made edits to remove these, but I believe that it is important to inform to you about this and to allow you to make the decision. I assert that Simple Wikipedia should follow the same guidelines as the main site in order to avoid it becoming chaotic pop-culture articles with bias/disruptive editing and to rid of these editing wars. 2601:940:C180:3DB0:7D8E:995E:B869:AE05 (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
↑Linden, M.; Maercker, A. "Embitterment. Societal, psychological, and clinical perspectives". Springer. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
↑Linden, M.; Baumann, K.; Lieberei, B.; Lorenz, C.; Rotter, M. (2011). "Treatment of posttraumatic embitterment disorder with cognitive behaviour therapy based on wisdom psychology and hedonia strategies". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 80 (4): 199–205. doi:10.1159/000321580. PMID21494061. S2CID24773913.
↑Linden, M.; Rutkowsky, K. (2013-01-29). Hurting memories and beneficial forgetting. Posttraumatic stress disorders, biographical developments, and social conflicts. Elsevier. ISBN978-0-12-398393-0.
↑Znoj, H.J.; Abegglen, S.; Buchkremer, U.; Linden, M. "The embittered mind: Dimensions of embitterment and validation of the concept". Journal of Individual Differences. 37 (4): 213–222. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000208.
I am not sure what or who you are talking about? I delete over 50 pages a day, I don't remember the name of them all. Please explain. Thx fr33kman18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
You weren’t kidding. 30 min in and I only tagged 1/4 of them. I tagged as G6 and referenced this conversation. I’ll resume tagging when some are cleared out. Need to also see what is under their sock account. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!08:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: Yes, I understand that this is that conversation. I also understand that it's frustrating to have an indeffed user's pages in maintenance categories. However, we can live with that while we do the proper procedures. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is really no difference between blanking or deleting them. Blanking them will allow them to come back and re-pollute everything especially with the malformed templates they were making and I’m still fixing some of them they brought over incorrectly and messed up. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 I can do that. Can I include any pages under their sock account if I find anywhere that are also in line with the issues or do I need to make two discussions because it’s two different user names? Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!08:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 Also I still feel the QD is justified as all of those are just copied from enwp with no simplification on them. Others are translated (by editors own admission) using google translate and something they marked as MT translated. So I’m not sure they should really go to RfD to be honest. That’s why a lot of them have red link templates and red link cats on them. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!09:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: The QD option for non-simplified pages applies to article space, not user space. People are allowed to have non-simplified stuff in their user space so they can work on it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: Yes. User space pages don't turn into articles when a user gets indeffed. I know it's frustrating, but we don't bypass requirements just because a user is indeffed (or banned). -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 Apologies as I was going directly off of your words People are allowed to have non-simplified stuff in their user space so they can work on it. but if they are indeffed/banned, they can no longer work on them. But anyways, so we aren’t filling up this page, I’ll put them all to RfD tomorrow from a pc. Thanks for explaining. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!09:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, with what you said on User talk:SportsOlympic#Unblock request, I probably agree. I noticed it has got stricter over the years. Wikipedia talk:Blocks and bans#Amendment to ONESTRIKE was made as over time, the rule had also changed more from banned users into just indef users. The block itself was probably one of the poorest blocks I've seen in terms of justification and I wasn't a fan at the time, but that's a matter for another day :) Usually we are a bit more generous than onestrike anyway. --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, rule creep can be a problem. The thing with one strike was that it was designed to protect the project not punish people who people didn't get along with fr33kman18:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello I am new here. as I have started to collaborate with the Sindh Adabi Board which is affiliated with the local government to save the Sindhi literature. I hope it would be ok to for me to collborate with them. I am also economics and history student with masters degree.
so I got the question here.
how do article publishing and article undeleting process works here? it seems many sindhi literature subjects are getting vanished due to the poor press or writers support.
Basically subjects must meet WP:GNG, include unbiased references, be of neutral points of view and be able to pass peer review if needed. Conflicts of interest must also be avoided which means people who work for an organisation should avoid writing articles about or concerning that organisation. Articles must be written in simple English using words contained in WP:BE850 and WP:BE1500 and be written in a way that the average student in US grades 6-9 can read and understand. Our mission is to offer articles that exist on the normal English Wikipedia but in simpler English. Feel free to ask members of the community for help on WP:ST. If you need the aid of an admin you can ask for help on WP:AN. If a member of the community contacts you with comments about your work assume that they are trying to help you and are not criticising you. If I can help please ask for help. Good luck and happy editing. fr33kman15:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I get it ː)
I won't write about any org. but my focus will be to preserve the Sindhi literature based on a neutral point of view.
I have last question. how do we request for articles undeletion if they're deleted due to not enough attention from writers from various areas
Hola, @Fr33kman, I come from the English Wikipedia. I'm not sure how to request page protection but a lot of IP addresses keep removing the deletion notice at Acharya Satish Awasthi. I think this should be protected from being edited by new users because it keeps getting removed. I have warned them. Cleo Cooper (talk) 03:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can I please have flood flag for one hour so I can add "establishments" categories for all the counties in US states? This needs to be done for New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, although I can probably get through 2-3 states in one hour today. Ferien gave me flood flag for this yesterday, see Special:UserRights/Kk.urban. Kk.urban (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused by the way you handled this page. As far as I am aware, any meaningful version of the history should not be deleted. If the page was vandalized, it would be better to restore the page and revert to the best version. Deleting the page and just importing context removes attribution for all the people who ever contributed to the page. BRP ever15:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was unable to restore the reference as it triggered the spam filter so the only way to recreate the page was to remove the reference. I think the spam filter may have been placed after the original page was made as not even admins can bypass it. fr33kman15:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While you're at it, can you fix the filter preventing me from fixing the invisble comment at List of countries and dependencies by population density Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"The text you wanted to publish was blocked by the spam filter. This is probably caused by a link to a forbidden external site. The following text is what triggered our spam filter: indiastat.com"
indiastat.com is on the spam blacklist so it can't be used as a source or reference. I am not willing to remove it from the list. You'll need another source instead. fr33kman19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It may have been added before the blacklist was added to. I'm not willing to remove it from the list so I'd recommend finding a better source. fr33kman10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I managed to find a combination of 2 and fix the article. But why does the blacklist prevent you from editing an article already with that source, not just prevent you from adding it. And why is it even on the blacklist to begin with Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Probably what's happened is the original article was written before the blacklist was written to. When you tried to save it afterwards it caught the spam. Just a guess mind you. fr33kman13:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that's probably why. What I am asking is why doesn't the blacklist prevent adding a link to the site, not just editing a page with that as a link Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia probably rewrites the whole page and triggers the filter. The fast answer is I'm guessing. You might want to ask @Eptalon: or @Djsasso: as they know more about the technical side of editing. fr33kman15:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 14:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, can you take a look at this user page? I already deleted it for QD G11 2 times, and I would like to have secondary opinions. Thank you for your attention. MathXplore (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Fr33kman, Just wanted to say thank you for spotting Talk:Human rights in Ethiopia wasn't empty - I left a few of his creations which weren't empty but somehow this ended up being CSD'd - not sure how but nonetheless thank you for spotting and declining :), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk17:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have a new CU request related to a page that you recently deleted. Please take a look when you have enough time. Thank you for your assistance and attention. MathXplore (talk) 00:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 10:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 10:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Fr33kman, for Reform UK which is obviously the page that you protected earlier today, can you please restore my reverted edit espacially the fact that that I added the Leader, the two Deputy Leaders and the Chairman. Thank you. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 11:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 01:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I have a CU request related to a page that you recently deleted. 2 users including me have presented evidence. Please have a look here. MathXplore (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the Kansai International Airport article I want to make a DYK on it saying the airport actually spans through 3 different cities, but is this a boring fact? Tsugarulet's talk! :)03:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! In case it might interest you - one thinks that "this wikipedia" should not be promoting quick tests regarding rabies ("Rabies antigen").--Looks also like ChenzwBot is cruising for meds: simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rabies_vaccine&diff=9686873&oldid=9686872
"Anyone" can roll out a quick-test for anything.--Quick-tests regarding cancer or regarding rabies, we should probably not touch even with a ten-foot pole.--Those should not be redirects, in my view. 2001:2020:315:C17E:2CAD:4160:514F:4AE2 (talk) 04:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:30D:FE3D:E52A:EDB4:B6D6:79E[reply]
I think that swep should contain everything notable. These tests that's becoming cheap, available, and people are using them then that's a) a notable actual physical product, b) that a significant portion of people are using them commonplaces. The ideas in the article need to be expressed in a NPOV manner and should cite good resources that show quality work. I think we're not here as a medical advisor, we merely present the raw data and let the reader do their own analysis. If we manage that we've done our job. fr33kman04:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 23:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 05:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 05:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 00:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 00:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 22:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 07:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
...for volunteering to help with the cleanup on that RfD, also I suspect it won't pass. I just wanted to mention, in case you didn't know, that it's fairly easy to delete a list of pages using AWB. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 12:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 03:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
It was words like veda and mantra which were not explained. I'll undelete it and put it in your user space for you to fix before moving it to main space if you wish.
Actually, the article was not completed. Okay. put it in my user space. I'll improve the article there.
@Fr33kman: I wish to request for the undeletion of the page Eloho Oyegwa so that I can improve on it to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The page was previously deleted due to a lack of reliable sources, but I have since gathered additional sources that provide substantial coverage of the subject. Below are the references I have compiled:
Hello Fr33kman,
I just closed your RfB. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to close it as successful, as 6/9 votes is too far away from the 85% stipulated by the guideline. As a comparison, when Ferien was elected two years ago, he had 18/19 votes in support. Even if I add my support, we are too far away (7/10 votes in support). Sorry. Eptalon (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for closing it. I knew it would fail after Ferien voted negative. As I said I'd not be upset either way. The community has changed a lot since 2014. Not for the better in my opinion. fr33kman14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 09:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, please note that all involved editors here are globally locked (the first global lock was placed by user:Vermont). Thank you for your responses. MathXplore (talk) 21:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, a user that you interacted with at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/VmVmVmV is making an unblock request, and they also want CU involvement in the unblock procedure. Please read the blocking reason carefully, and please feel free to ask any questions to me. Please note that the user is not logged in enwiki, so we cannot request SPI action over there. I look forward to hearing from you. MathXplore (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think they wanted to prove their innocence, but since the user is now globally locked, there is no need of further action. Thank you for your responses and sorry for the disturbance. MathXplore (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is almost four years from now, anything could happen and we're not a crystal ball. If you have notable candidates and reliable sources then go ahead and recreate it and I'll take a look. fr33kman01:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you quote the rules that would allow you to create the page? We dont even know for sure who will be definitely runniñg yet. fr33kman04:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 03:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Fr33kman, I would like to discuss about a page that was deleted before i think accidentally,i refear Ardi Pulaj he is notable newsanchor and journalist in Albania, and of course i will add necessary info-s as references in future if possible,Thanks in advance . Benny8907 (talk) 12:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Is there a template on simplewiki to insert into a user's talk page informing them about the requirement to add sources to information? We have something like this in plwiki (pl:Szablon:Kom), but I can't find it here. Thank you and have a nice day! BZPN (talk) 09:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BZPN is {{Uw-unsourced1}} what you are looking for? Also a reminder that not everything needs to be sourced. Preferably, they should be, but there are some exceptions like common knowledge, widely accepted facts and so on. In many cases, it is also easier to add the source by borrowing it from enwiki than removing the content.--BRP ever15:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BRPever, Yes, that's what I meant, thank you! I meant to use such a template in a situation where the user creates a new article/new changes without providing any sources. Moreover, not all sources from enwiki are always of good quality (after all, weak sources are also used there). WP:Verifiability says: Verifiability is the key to becoming a reliable resource, so editors should cite credible sources so that their edits can be easily verified. Information like 2+2=4 is very rare. Requiring as many good quality sources as possible is not a bad thing, because the more sources, the easier it is for the reader to verify the information. Regards, BZPN (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) My view has always been that we should have reliable resources on every article, even though I don't know of any policy/guideline that says that. If there is indeed no policy or guideline, we can't tell people it's a requirement, especially if there's no policy/guideline saying to have any sources at all.
As for using substandard sources, that's trickier. IMDB is one tricky one, because some of that content is vetted and some isn't. I wouldn't want to be the person checking that references using IMDB were citing only the vetted parts. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For IMDB, I usually only trust the writers credit as that's known to be verified for American films before it gets added on IMDB. Anything else potentially is based on a user suggestion, so it's problematic to use. Decicdely NEVER to use the user ratings.
I don't remember the exact specifics, but there have been films in the past where a user edit / suggestion resulted in someone being added to the film's cast section when they weren't involved, or at best were an extra (which IMDB ppurportedly doesn't list). Release dates can be tricky because I don't know if they follow the exact same rules as we do for release dates. Film ratings from MPA can be trusted, but I'm rarely in favor of film censor board ratings being included baring something unusual about a particular rating as they are country specific. Think Midnight Cowboy for a decent example. I like IMDB as an Other website link, but as a source, there's usually better options. Ravensfire (talk) 03:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi could you please edit the main page featured article
It is in the northeastern part of the state, near the Kansas City area. It is the county seat of Douglas County. In 2010, 87,643 people lived there; though in 2019, there were an estimated 98,193 people.
Could you please change this to:
It is in the northeastern part of the state, near Kansas City. It is the county seat of Douglas County. In 2020, 94,934 people lived there.
Hello @Fr33kman From past 1 month i am observing there are many People making paid pages on simple wikipedia. People who are not having any news article and having 2-3 paid article also getting live here. And Scammers are using fake references as well with fake references. And a user @Symonds Gerother is involved in it because today i inserted qd in 5-10 non notable pages and he revereted all the changes and removed qd. So he is also involved in the group of people who are making paid pages of non notable people so deleted all the pages on which i have inserted qd and which has been remove by @Symonds Gerother and Block this user.
Probably better left at WP:AN, but the Symonds Gerother is CU blocked on enwiki and the SPI [29] suggests this could be Amansharma111, who often uses fake sources when they have created articles with previous socks. Given they've been blocked on enwiki and are using fake sources here, might be one-strike territory? Ravensfire (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ravensfire Yes you are right but he maybe sockpuppet of Amansharma111 but he is having many different IP Address which he is trying to mimic. For his paid page creating trick. Kindlt (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fr33kman. I wanted to ask if it's possible for you to review Kendall Jenner's GA nomination? There's three votes in favor of promotion, but I wanted to get some more feedback/reviews before promoting the article. Thanks :) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Fr33kman, I just thought I'd give you a courtesy notice I reverted your change to the deletion policy/interface. I added my thoughts to the simple talk discussion - any changes to deletion policy should be given at the talk page of the deletion policy page/simple talk. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I advise that you make sure that you delete the talk page of any page you quickly delete (e.g. Template talk:User fart-N). This eliminates the need to separately tag talk pages for G8 quick deletion after the fact. I believe Twinkle can help with this. Also, are you sure this deletion was correct? I assume that the page was a redirect to User talk:DrKay (if not, please let me know), and I don't think you're supposed to U2 redirects that are left behind due to the renaming of users. Or at least, that's how it works on enwiki. If it's different over here, please let me know. JJPMaster (she/they) 17:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't see the talk page was there. I've deleted it now. Yes that other deletion was correct, the user doesn't exist. fr33kman17:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How would it determine whether or not it should be deleted? There is no QD criterion to delete based on the size of an article. fr33kman21:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @BZPN: I don't feel like this would be a good idea. On the one hand, if it were too broad, it could include relatively short non-QDable articles. I checked, and the article about Biłgoraj is under 150 kB. And if it were too specific, it would probably not do much. JJPMaster (she/they) 21:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would be possible to determine if an article is sheer Vandalism. Chenzwbot does that already but does not place QD templates. Not saying that it is a good idea just that for Vandalism it might be possible. fr33kman21:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean here is inserting G2 for pages that do not contain any formatting, links, etc. This would involve inserting QD into typical test pages. BZPN (talk) 21:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BZPN You should probably have proposed this at simple talk so that more eyes can see it. Anyway, this is a really bad idea. This would not be the first bot to automatically tag pages for QD (I believe it was User:GoblinBot4 that did this first). Bots should not be used for controversial tasks (at least not without a consensus) and QDs can be contested. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page21:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fehufanga, It's just my idea, I didn't mean to implement it without discussion. I recently noticed that a lot of test pages are being created (a few letters, no formatting), and QDs are not automatically inserted into them, which could be useful. 150kb is only an approximate value :). BZPN (talk) 21:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Am wondering how to merge 2 wiki if both are similar
Like we use REDIRECT,
But what if a person has 2 same wiki same content in it .
How to merge and make it one article , not 2. AERCTANGE (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bro can you make sure few gambling sites has been promoted in simplewiki which doens't have en.wiki , also most of them are paid articles.
I wish you can help me to clear those pages , because I always belive Wikipedia for truth and wisdom, so kind peoples don't fall in such traps of those betting and casino sites.
No it should not have been deleted. I thought the request was by the author. I should have checked the history first. Thanks for checking it fr33kman18:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks again for fixing the mess the other person created it's very much appreciated, have a great day/evening, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk19:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True tbh but mistakes do happen, we're only human, you've put it all right asap and have been communicative throughout so no harm done:), Thanks –Davey2010Talk20:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for specifying! I will try to remember, but don't take offense if I use gender-neutral pronouns again. I actually did check your user page to see if you had a gender userbox, but didn't see one. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. Message added 23:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
This is my new user wright after My user globally locked and blocked. I explained a lot everywhere and now I would mention that I have a brother and he was fan of Farsad (rapper) and sometimes vote in AFD and make some edition in Farsi Wikipedia and we mostly use same PC.
Thanks for telling me that you are blocked globally on your other account. You are not allowed to make a new account and edit. Your new account is also now blocked. fr33kman11:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Fr33kman! I hope you're doing well! I was wondering if you could grant me the flood flag for a little while. I’d like to remove the shortdesc template from a few dozen articles, and I don’t want to clutter the RC. Let me know if that’s okay! Thank you and best regards, BZPN (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hello i am here to say merry christmas and a happy new year! Hope everything good happens to you in the next year also i am the same person contribuiting with car and car brands articles but my ip frequently changes but this dosent bother me as i am more comfortable being anonymous anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! 179.109.143.151 (talk) 22:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. Message added 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi! Happy Holidays! Could you take a look at this discussion and provide thoughts if you feel compelled to do so? With your background, I believe it will help myself and others in determining the best course forward for our readers. Griff (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2024 (tUTC)
Sure. I normally avoid such topics so I don't add bias but I think this time it is important to offer a professional opinion. fr33kman20:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fr33kman, I would like to respectfully request the undeletion of the article, Enrique Mendiola. His notability can be seen in Tagalog Wikipedia, Enrique Mendiola despite the gruff header (note: it is not being deleted in spite of it). Enrique Mendiola (b.1859 — d.1914) is one of the Philippines' pioneer educators and legal authors. The thoroughfare named after him, Mendiola Street has been the stage for many mass rallies for human rights; and political and labor protests. I can volunteer to work with further erudition and improve these articles — if allowed. For your consideration, please. Buszmail (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Buszmail Just an FYI the article at Tagalog Wikipedia only has 2 references; one is a personal blog, the other is okay but probably taken from the Tagalog article so imho cannot be used. I've not found anything better online either so unfortunately this is a perfect WP:A4 candidate, Also there is no article on the English Wikipedia which further proves the notability point.
As Fr33kman says you're more than welcome to go to DRV however don't be surprised if it gets closed as QD-endorsed, I'd be happy to continue this on your or my talkpage but please don't respond here, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk21:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Fr33kman. When you QD a page that has an RFD on it, would you please close the RFD? I just closed a few where you had QD'd the page, and it would have been nice of you to take care of it yourself.
Also, in cases like this, consider that if we let the RFD play out and the page gets deleted, it opens up WP:QD#G4 for possible use in the future if the page gets recreated. Thanks! -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for please erasing the misspelled names I created accidentally. I must have been just creating too much too fast. Should be careful in future page creation. Angela Kate MaureenPears17:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
After my break i would like to regain my permissions of Patroller and Rollbacker if possible and get back to editing. Thankyou. DIVINE (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the subject is notable and fulfils any problems with the former version of the article has been addressed then the best test is to make a new article using reliable sources and a neutral point of view and adhering to the biographies of living persons policy and see what happens. If there are still issues that need addressing. So basically give it a shot and see what happens. You could also create the article in your user space and ask people to review it before moving it to the main encyclopedia. Hope this help :) fr33kman20:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman, Hi there, I'm requesting for rollback right, I'll unable to recover my old account due to 2:FA protection and my old account have rollback right, so, I request to you, please remove rollback privileges from my old account and add rollback in my current account , now from I'll be use this account for vandalism fighting on simple english wiki and This account is CU Verified on english wikipedia.Happy editing --- Aαrαv200 • [@píng mє]08:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On meta there is a way to request them to remove 2fa from your account. I've had to use it before. It takes a few days but it'll get your account back as long as you have access to your email account. I'll give you the flags but I'd recommend you get back access. fr33kman16:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
one problem is that gmail linked with this account is also 2:fa protected , i tried earlier but i am not able to access gmail, so, even if two factor authorization is removed from the account, it will be difficult for me to get the account back,so please add rollback in this account.Happy editing --- Aαrαv200 • [@píng mє]16:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
hello i am the same ip user who contribuited here but i created this account to make car articles and maybe in the future articles about Airlines buses and trucks and also today i am still dont know what car article should i create i think i will make the honda element article but anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 18:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good evening Fr33kman. I wonder if you may be able to help me, please?
Earlier today, I saw the QD request for Chris Mustapha Nwakobia Jnr. I placed a "Wait" on the article, and provided reasons on the talk page, which indicated that he had notability, and that he had been covered in the Nigerian Press, on African Television (and I have since discovered, he's been interviewed on Radio about Nigerian politics), and heads one of the largest Nigerian reform forums in the country.
He was also a Presidential candidate in the 2011 Nigerian Elections. The sourcing may have been poor, but those things alone (especially the Presidential candidacy) and his other work, should give him notability in the field of politics. He is a Professor of Political Sciences.
There is also an RFD currently open, which the nominator (User:BigKrow) opened at the same time as the QD. Whether that was a mistake or not, I don't know, but I do see that the user has been told off about some of their QD requests.
Could I please ask you to consider undeleting the article, in favour of allowing it to go through a standard RFD? You didn't delete the talk page with my notes on, and I'm wondering if you saw what I'd noted when you deleted it.
@BigKrow: - Apologies for the tone of my comment. I had visited your talk page after I saw the double request on the article I mentioned above, and noted from that, that @Auntof6: had considered restricting you from making QD and RFD requests, asking you to take a step back. English is not my first language, and I occasionally word things in a manner which appears rude or curt. Being told off, as I understand it, means that you've been spoken to about something you might be doing wrong. If I've got that wrong, I apologise. DaneGeld (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, that's not the case. The article is deleted, and the entry on the article page shows you deleted it. Would you be open to restoring it, please? And thank you! DaneGeld (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'll have to reopen a new RFD on it, because after it was deleted, Rayaan closed the RFD down. I'll try and improve the article whilst the RFD is open! DaneGeld (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DaneGeld: Being told off does basically mean what you said, but it means being told in an aggressive or angry way about something you did wrong. I didn't intend to sound aggressive or angry. English has so many synonyms that it can be difficult to understand the connotation of a word. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's good to know! It proves that even if you learn a language, you still have room to learn more! English is very intricate, and I have no doubt that I need to improve. DaneGeld (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2 or 3-word-reply, will be regarded as 'more than enough'
"Beta blockers are a class of drugs that inhibit (stops the release of the hormone,) adrenalin and the neurotransmitter noradrenalin".--Is this first sentence (in article), 'maybe okay' or 'maybe not okay', in your view.--(If maybe-not-okay, then i will simply 'hand-the-matter' over to the relevant talk-page.)--Your possible reply will be highly appreciated! 2001:2020:335:AF89:D1B4:D989:8E96:76CE (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, could you kindly explain why the Davide Lo Surdo page is not online? It meets the notability criteria (museums exhibitions, statue, Rolling Stone Brasil article signed, independent sources signed, etc). I don't understand. The article was neutral. Can you kindly explain? I ask you to check it out again with attention and restore the article if possible. Thanks
Can you kindly help me to recreate it without getting it deleted again? As mentioned it meets the notability criteria (museums exhibitions, statue, Rolling Stone Brasil article signed, independent sources signed, etc. I can recreate it but i need your help to make sure it doesn’t get deleted again. Can you help? Johnmarrys (talk) 03:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey admin I need urgent help at the article you deleted I recreated it, and I also made it comply with Wikipedia guidline , but the same editor that nominated it for quick deletion nominated it again and For G4, I thought G4 was for articles that have been deleted throug article for deletion not quick deletion, this User has also tried reverting several edits I made to the article to request the retaining, thank you. Notstrange1 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
G4 only states the Recreation of a deleted page. It does not state whether or not that is by QD or RfD. The best thing to do would be to place a {{wait}} template on it and explain why on the talk page outlining the issue. fr33kman16:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Creation of content that is already deleted. It includes an identical or similar copy, with any title, of a page that was deleted, after being discussed in Requests for deletion, unless it was undeleted due to another discussion or was recreated in the user space.
Then recreate it with the wait template stating that QD is not valid as it never went through RfD and the responding admin should decline the QD request. fr33kman16:42, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Next time, hit "History", choose the most recent good revision and then save that as a new page. :) fr33kman 16:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
