Jump to content

User talk:Chenzw/Archives/Aug 2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/Aug_2009.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.


Hi, I've started a discussion on how we can prevent these creations. I know you had some concern of false positives. I want to see if there is a way around this. Please comment if you can. [1] Best! NonvocalScream (talk) 00:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I blocked 202.89.187.64 after you gave him a final warning (didn't see his talk page until after I'd already hit the Block button). I didn't bother reversing the block because, really, it was a worthless IP editor anyway (nothing but vandalism), but I overwrote your final warning with a block message. Just giving you a heads up and a bit of an apology. ;) EVula // talk // // 04:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got it. It doesn't really matter. Chenzw  Talk  04:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand the regex all that well. The one you suggested looks a bit complicated and I am not sure exactly if to add all of it. Could you add it yourself... I don't want to make a mistake. Thanks, NonvocalScream (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. On a side note, if you compare the regex on AN and on the blacklist, the change from the plus "+" sign to the question mark "?" was intentional as it was a mistake. Chenzw  Talk  06:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News: Issue Eleven

[change source]
The Simple News
The Simple News
Issue Eleven
3rd August 2009

Announcements

User Articles
In his fourth article, Pmlinediter talks about Oversight, DYK and more

Administrator News
Swine Flu update

As of Sunday 3th August 2009 188,139 cases of Swine Flu have been confirmed. 1265 people have now died from it.


QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, a user will be interviewed by a member of the Simple News team. This idea was started by Kennedy. Interviews are generally taking by a member of the Simple News Team - to date this has included Bluegoblin7, Kennedy, Pmlinediter, Shappy and Yotcmdr.

This weeks interview is with Barras.

Click here for Barras' interview!


The Commander's Choice

The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. This time Pmlinediter is selecting the articles. Here is this edition's list:


The News in Brief

Main Stories:


Click here for the Sports stories!

Pmlineditor 10:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

[change source]

I failed. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 03:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:) Chenzw  Talk  03:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need a tool that will display UTC time... I got so frusterated last night because I could not remember my GMT offset to caculate UTC. :) Thank you for fixing that. NonvocalScream (talk) 14:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is one in the gadgets in your preferences. Barras || talk 14:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Try FoxClocks for Firefox. I configure it to sit as a toolbar in my browser displaying the major timezones... very handy. Chenzw  Talk  14:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you call this up, down, or split, please? It's overdue Purplebackpack89 (talk) 04:06, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative action

[change source]

Greetings,

I've noticed that you undid one of my administrative actions here at user request. Please consider redoing my action, I do not wish it undone. Thank you, NonvocalScream (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the OS policy, it states that oversight is done for "Removal of potentially libellous information either: a) on the advice of Wikimedia Foundation counsel or b) when the subject has specifically asked for the information to be removed from the history, the case is clear, and there is no editorial reason to keep the revision.". In this case, BG7 did not appear to ask for it to be removed, so a reversion (in theory) would do. I would not undo my restoration as BG7 specifically asked me to, so it would be best for another uninvolved admin to review this. Chenzw  Talk  15:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did not oversight.
  • Deletion is different from oversight.
  • We don't undo administrative actions without discussion.

Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I have mixed up deletion and oversight. I will redelete the revisions, along with an explanatory note on his talk page. Chenzw  Talk  15:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reconsideration. In this way, we deny the vandals the attention they so crave. Very best, NonvocalScream (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]