User talk:Chenzw/Archives/Feb 2015
|
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chenzw/Archives/Feb_2015. |
 |
| This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw. |
|
|
The Signpost: 04 February 2015
[change source]- News and notes: No men beyond this point: the proposal to create a no-men space on Wikipedia
- Op-ed: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- In the media: Gamergate and Muhammad controversies continue
- Traffic report: The American Heartland
- Featured content: It's raining men!
- Arbitration report: Slamming shut the GamerGate
- WikiProject report: Dicing with death – on Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Security issue fixed; VisualEditor changes
- Gallery: Langston Hughes
Why do you revert?
[change source]I believe I've met you on zh.wikipedia.org. When I want to make positive contribution to Windows XP, I've got the most negative response. But why you revert to my passed efforts on simple.Wikipedia.org? I wish I could make things better or even perfect, but why people on wiki always set blocks to me no matter what kind of languages I use?
- I didn't revert any changes made by you. Chenzw Talk 12:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
你不过是另一个我见过的屎！ — This unsigned comment was added by 95.129.41.111 (talk • changes) on 12:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC).
让我来看看你能不能屏掉全世界的IP地址，如果你能够做到，我一定会佩服你的。不过我还是先祝愿你新年闹心，万事碰壁。— This unsigned comment was added by 198.178.117.200 (talk • changes) on 12:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC).
Recent blocks
[change source]I saw that you blocked a bunch of IPs. I suspect User:199.19.95.59 might be in the same category, so I mention here in case you want to look. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed, I must have missed it just now... thanks! Chenzw Talk 13:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2015
[change source]- From the editors: We want to know what you think!
- News and notes: One editor faces likely ban for work on Wikipedia; another awarded $1 million
- In the media: Is Wikipedia eating itself?
- Traffic report: Bowled over
- WikiProject report: Brand new WikiProjects profiled
- Featured content: A grizzly bear, Operation Mascot, Freedom Planet & Liberty Island, cosmic dust clouds, a cricket five-wicket list, more fine art, & a terrible, terrible opera...
- Gallery: Feel the love
Hello
[change source]Hello Chenzw! Happy Chinese New Year! :D Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi sorry for the late reply. Thank you very much! Here's also wishing you a great year ahead! Chenzw Talk 07:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2015
[change source]- Editorial: Recent retirements typify problem of admin attrition
- In the media: Students' use and perception of Wikipedia
- Special report: Revision scoring as a service
- Traffic report: February is for lovers
- Gallery: Darwin Day
- Featured content: A load of bull-sized breakfast behind the restaurant, Koi feeding, a moray eel, Spaghetti Nebula and other fishy, fishy fish
- Arbitration report: We've built the nuclear reactor; now what colour should we paint the bikeshed?
Disputed tag in the article
[change source]Hi. I'm Political Cricketer. You recently added the disputed tag in the article named List of highest-grossing Tollywood (Telugu) movies. I watched and read the talk page of it. But there is no disputed content, instead, there is a clarification about the collections of the film named Eega. I hope you will go through it once and remove the tag. Thank you. PK talk 17:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I added the tag due to the numerous unsourced changes made to the article. I reverted some of the anon edits, but was still unsure of the correct version, hence the tag. Since you have gone through it and found no problems with the data, I will remove the tag. Chenzw Talk 00:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. PK talk 16:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
[change source]- News and notes: Did WMF "participate" in nefarious activity?
- Op-ed: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- In the media: WikiGnomes and Bigfoot
- Gallery: Far from home
- Traffic report: Fifty Shades of... self-denial?
- Featured content: The Moon, Mars, Venus, and Saturn, in no particular order. Also, Kaiser Kong.
- Recent research: Gender bias, SOPA blackout, and a student assignment that backfired
- WikiProject report: Be prepared... Scouts in the spotlight
- Blog: Join the Wikimedia strategy consultation
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
[change source]- News and notes: Did WMF "participate" in nefarious activity?
- Op-ed: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- In the media: WikiGnomes and Bigfoot
- Traffic report: Fifty Shades of... self-denial?
- Featured content: The Moon, Mars, Venus, and Saturn, in no particular order. Also, Kaiser Kong.
- Recent research: Gender bias, SOPA blackout, and a student assignment that backfired
- Gallery: Far from home
- WikiProject report: Be prepared... Scouts in the spotlight
- Blog: Join the Wikimedia strategy consultation