Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

123FormBuilder

123FormBuilder (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Was going to copyedit and stubify this...and then I realized there weren't any sources to justify stubifying it. Everything here is either primary and published by this company, or a clearly-paid press release. Doesn't seem to be notable. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 05:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ansel, California

Ansel, California (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

192.83.149.205 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Topos show a long siding on the railroad with no buildings, doesn't seem to be a community. Deleted on enwiki for this reason: en:Special:Redirect/logid/113534816. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Old Corral, California

Old Corral, California (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

192.83.149.205 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable location; satellite images show only a small store and a few scattered residences. No evidence this is a recognized place, thus failing en:WP:GEOLAND; sourced only to GNIS, which does not establish notability. No secondary coverage found at all. Another low-effort stub mass-created by the same retired user in 2009, based only on GNIS entries, which do not prove notability. Deleted on enwiki for this reason: en:Special:Redirect/logid/156249057. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Exotic

Category:Exotic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The scope of this category is poorly defined. The hat note says "Animals that are rare and hard to find," but the "hard to find" part is subjective. The category name doesn't even specify animals. I think a better way to indicate rare animals is by using the appropriate categories under Category:Species by conservation status. Auntof6 (talk) 09:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete "Exotic" is too generic of a category name and will (no doubt) lead to confusion when placing stuff in categories.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete I want it deleted--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: I am the author of this category--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

• Not a useful category. Rathfelder (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pink Grasshopper

Pink Grasshopper (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is written as though the "pink grasshopper" is a specific species, but it is not. It is a color variation. Not only that, but the color is found in more than one species, not just Pseudochorthippus parallelus as implied by the lead. The 4th reference in the article even refers to a different species, Chorthippus parallelus. I don't think we need a separate article about a color variation that occurs in multiple species. Auntof6 (talk) 08:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete I want it deleted--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 12:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Cactusisme: articles can only be quickly deleted if they meet quick deletion criteria. --Ferien (talk) 01:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

  G7? I am author Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zozo kahramana

Zozo kahramana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable? Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 04:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bandar Tun Razak

Bandar Tun Razak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources and non-notable place. Ternera (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

It appears to be a substantial settlement and a constituency. Article needs improving not deleting.Rathfelder (talk) 22:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Charlie Strapp and Froggy Ball Saves The Chicken (1987 Short Films)

Charlie Strapp and Froggy Ball Saves The Chicken (1987 Short Films) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Questionable notability. Ternera (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Countries at the UEFA European Championship

Template:Countries at the UEFA European Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating some unused navigational box templates because they each have too few blue links in the body of the template to do the job of navigation.

• Template:Countries at the UEFA European Championship: one blue link
• Template:Flags of Russia: one blue link
• Template:Former Solomon Islands constituencies: no blue links
• Template:UEFA European Championship Young Player of the Tournament: one blue link

-- Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat

Template:Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating an unused template and its subpages, listed below. This template is intended as a setup template for categories related to expatriate sportspeople. However, we don't have any such categories, so these templates are not needed here.

• Template:Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat
• Template:Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat/sortname
• Template:Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat/doc

-- Auntof6 (talk) 10:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Latest preview software release/Debian

Template:Latest preview software release/Debian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a number of unused templates for latest preview or stable software releases.

I believe that each of these is unused for one of the following reasons:

• We don't have an article about the software.
• We have an article, but the article doesn't display release info.
• We have an article that displays release info, but it either hardcodes the info or gets it from Wikidata.

To see the list of templates included in this RfD, click on "expand" below.

-- Auntof6 (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The templates haven't been updated for a while and the use of these templates seem to have stopped in favour of setting this at the infobox param level rather than setting it to transclude a subpage and having it be done there.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Comment from nominator: These are the software release templates that aren't used, but there are others that are used (see Category:Latest preview software release templates and Category:Latest stable software release templates). If people feel all of them should be eliminated, I suppose we could do that, although for what it's worth, enwiki still uses some. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Amanda Kasmira Cryer

Amanda Kasmira Cryer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 07:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:People from the Gold Coast, Queensland by occupation

Category:People from the Gold Coast, Queensland by occupation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: With the number of different occupations, even if we did fill this up, I don't see a point in having a whole category "by occupation" for this city. Cleanup as part of User:Ferien/TBA/P3. --Ferien (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:People from Alice Springs by occupation

Category:People from Alice Springs by occupation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: With the number of different occupations, even if we did fill this up, I don't see a point in having a whole category "by occupation" for this city. Cleanup as part of User:Ferien/TBA/P3. --Ferien (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Magic Kingdom

Template:Magic Kingdom (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: All of these templates are unused. While two of these templates do have blue links, I do not think that the number of blue links is large enough for these templates to be useful were the templates to be used.MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Operation Terror

Operation Terror (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Longestview has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:MOVIE. No reliable source offers significant coverage. LV^✉✎ 03:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• KEEP: Notable Movie. Written by Notable Person. Has appropriate references and longer than many other pages. LordBirdWord (talk)
• Page length does not matter in deletion discussions. There is no minimum or maximum length that qualifies an article for inclusion. Additionally, your claim of "appropriate references" does not match notability guidelines. Per WP:MOVIE:

A movie's entry in the The Internet Movie Database, or similar databases, can provide valuable information including links to reviews, articles, and media references. A page in the database does not by itself show the movie's notability, however.

The only sources listed in the article are the previously mentioned IMDb and Amazon Prime Video, which also counts as a database for the purposes of notability. I could not find any sources that would count as proof of notability. LV^✉✎ 00:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Uw3

Template:Uw3 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Already have this template Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 23:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Speedy keep Neutral this template is used in the other level-3 warning templates and deleting it would break those. —76.212.74.243 (talk) 23:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Update: just checked Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Uw3. We actually only have two templates (Template:Uw-unsourced3 and Template:Uw-unsourced3) using this one, so we might be able to delete Uw3. On the other hand, enwiki uses their Uw3 template for almost every level-3 warning template. —76.212.74.243 (talk) 23:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

• This is most similar to {{Uw-disruption}} but I think this could exist alongside our other templates sort of as a base for level 3 warnings. Leaning keep. --Ferien2 (talk) 08:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
• This Template's Sole Purpose is to serve wikipedia only and warn vandals. deleting it will not serve any purpose as far as i know. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep for the same reason we have Template:Userbox. This template is clearly used in the creation of level 3 warning templates.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep because (in addition to that above), I could imagine uses for it on it's own, when no template is really applicable but the changes are in fact causing disruption. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Wally Gator

Template:Wally Gator (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This unused navigational template has only one blue link in the body, so it can't do its job of navigation. Auntof6 (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. The IP that created this template had a history of copying over templates without creating instances of said templates. I recommend also deleting these templates, made by the same IP: Template:DC Comics animated TV series, Template:Huckleberry Hound, Template:Magic Kingdom, Template:Top Cat, Template:Quick Draw McGraw, and Template:Magilla Gorilla. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  @MrMeAndMrMe: You're welcome to make a separate RFD for those. Note, though, that some of those have multiple blue links and one is used. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Spanish Senate constituencies

Template:Spanish Senate constituencies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This navigational template has no blue links in the body, so it can't do its job of navigation. Auntof6 (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category

Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating the two unused templates and their doc pages, listed below. They are intended to be used as category headers for categories that contain Olympics-related sidebar templates, but we don't seem to have any of those.

The templates are not transcluded anywhere, but they may appear to be used because their doc pages link to each other as related templates.

• Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category
• Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category/doc
• Template:YYYY Winter Olympics events sidebars category
• Template:YYYY Winter Olympics events sidebars category/doc

Auntof6 (talk) 20:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini

Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

192.83.149.205 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article seems to be mostly promotional, although there is some information about controversies, so it doesn't qualify for quick deletion as advertising. I can't find enough coverage in independent reliable sources for notability. Also, some of the references don't exist, or at least the links are broken and I can't find them. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: IP address that issued warning edit-protected, not allowing the article to be adjusted or to address the IP’s concerns. It’s fine as it is, needs citation cleanup. International news, professional acting, published works make notability. Intrying78 (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: Moved comment, this comment is one of their first edits in this project. MathXplore (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: CU requested, Special:Diff/9625983. MathXplore (talk) 00:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: User blocked quickly due to violent talk page and RFD actions, locked via LWCU. MathXplore (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Can I clarify what is LWCU, thanks Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 04:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

  LWCU = Loginwiki CheckUser MathXplore (talk) 06:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• Nominating user 192.83.149.205 I have question. Why no account, and why did your account just start on 30 May 2024..? InFact2024 (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: User locked via LWCU. MathXplore (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  67.159.8.140 created this page, Jackson Maier. Might be lock evasion? Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 06:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

   Done This is an open proxy, blocked again, and a global block was requested. MathXplore (talk) 07:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

  thanks Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 07:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

• Skeptical Keep: As previously mentioned by another user perhaps this is a good article for the Wiki. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the circumstances surrounding both the creation and its deletion request are… head scratching at the least. Ywatch16 (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: User blocked/locked. MathXplore (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral: There’s so much webbing of pages around this, just catching up on the history. It’s odd and may be autobiographical.
• Neutral: There’s so much webbing of pages around this, just catching up on the history. It’s odd and may be autobiographical. Fhlturnmont (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: Moved comment, user locked. MathXplore (talk) 02:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

See en:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Stluciainformation/Archive and en:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini for more information on this crossiwki spam. Has been deleted countless of times across multiple wikis, e.g. frwiki [1] or sswiki [2] (recent sockpuppets don't appear at the SPI, because I've locked them right away). --Johannnes89 (talk) 05:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees

Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating the UEFA Euro referees templates listed below for deletion, because they are unused navigational boxes with too few blue links in the body to do any navigation. (Each has either zero links or only one.) These templates were created between June and September 2023.

These templates are not transcluded anywhere, meaning that they aren't used as nav boxes. They are linked only by Template:UEFA European Championship templates. It looks like they are linked in other places but that is only because that template is transcluded by other templates.

• Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1968 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1972 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1976 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1984 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1988 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1992 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 1996 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 2012 referees
• Template:UEFA Euro 2016 referees

Auntof6 (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wiki (software)

Wiki (software) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has nothing to do with the title and is clearly some sort of school essay. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete While wikis as a software concept are notable, it would be better to just w:WP:TNT it.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete article has nothing to do with the title. Ternera (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

EmiTQM

EmiTQM (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the notability standard for musicians. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hello! I appreciate your review of EmiTQM's page and understand your concern about notability. However, I believe EmiTQM meets the criteria for notability for musicians and notable individuals, especially considering his young age and the impact he has already achieved. I would like to present additional evidence to support this claim:

• Impact on digital platforms at a young age: EmiTQM's debut single, "Igual y me Pensaste," has gained significant success on platforms like Spotify and has been featured as the second song on a major radio station's Top 10 playlist in the northern region of Mexico. It's important to note that EmiTQM is achieving this at just 17 years old, demonstrating exceptional talent and potential.
• Media coverage: EmiTQM has received attention from various media outlets, not only recently for his music but also on a national level for his achievements as a fencer. I've attached a link to an article about his third-place win at the Mexican National Olympiad. (I understand this is not music-related, but it shows he has had media presence.) https://notired34parral.com/?p=17587
• Industry recognition: EmiTQM has received praise from music industry professionals, and I've attached a review of his first song as evidence. These professionals have recognized his talent and potential despite his young age.
• Future potential: Despite his short career, EmiTQM has shown exceptional talent as a singer, songwriter, and producer, especially considering his age. His ability to create moving music and connect with audiences on an emotional level suggests a promising future in the music industry. It's unfair to compare him to artists with longer careers at this early stage.

I kindly request your reconsideration of this page. Thank you. 2806:2F0:3460:675:612A:A729:EAA4:FBEE (talk) 00:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I checked his debut single and... 1,945 plays on Spotify? You can hardly call that "Impact on digital platforms". Definitely fails notability as a musician. Longestview (talk) 05:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Wikipedia is not a place to help new artists gain traction in their career. Ternera (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  Dear Ternera,

  I understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, but rather a repository of information on public figures and their achievements. It's unfair to compare someone with a longer career to someone just starting out.

  While EmiTQM is a new artist, I believe his trajectory and achievements thus far warrant documentation on Wikipedia. He has already garnered significant attention on social media and streaming platforms, demonstrating a genuine public interest. Additionally, he has received media coverage from various outlets, indicating a growing recognition within the music industry. His athletic achievements, such as winning a bronze medal in fencing at the National Olympiad, further highlight his potential as a public figure.

  I believe that documenting EmiTQM's journey on Wikipedia, while adhering to the platform's guidelines of verifiability and neutrality, would contribute to a more comprehensive and inclusive record of emerging artists. It would also provide valuable information to those interested in learning more about this promising young talent. Magzznews (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

RanDada Farm

RanDada Farm (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notable? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 01:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep this article, not promote can update for more after done. 36.37.233.192 (talk) 10:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
• KEEP it. Want delete to delete DO NOT make discussion with  teamwork. Article also not create by himself. I think so.
• Silent is gold. 36.37.204.152 (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: Moved comment, IPs blocked as lock evasion (Special:CentralAuth/Yin_Boran). MathXplore (talk) 07:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: all the Ips, except creator, have only one edit which is this. --Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - Advertising. Longestview (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: I feel like there is promotional content.--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
• keep 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

I think that, this article is a great place to learn about cattle farming. It's should be have a article on wiki with simple English and short sentence. 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is for having information, not teaching? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't know sir, just cmt. It's just my thinking 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Its fine, lets see what the admin thinks. Thanks for your time Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear Cactus🌵, I creator this article, should be keep it to increase higher communicate clearly and strongly with people who like cattle or animal pet. 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

okay Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks dear Cactus🌵 🤍❤ 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

• keep 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

• Should be keep this article admin it’s good for information and can edit for more in future. 😀😀 36.37.152.186 (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

your^ Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

• Keep?: บทความนี้เป็นข้อมูลสั้นๆ เก็บไว้แก้ไขทีหลังครับ 117.20.117.103 (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Please write in English. Would you mind explaining your opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Doesn't seem notable and even if it somehow is the page is 200% promotional.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  How do all these Ips know about this page though? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  Judging by the similar formatting I'm willing to say it's either IP-hopping or meatpuppetry.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  or maybe they are all part of a company to promote this farm? Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 11:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Just u thinking. Don’t kid urself i see u always delete delete delete someone u don’t know. 36.37.233.192 (talk) 10:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  what Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 11:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: I find it suspicious that so many IPs are showing up to request that the article be kept. Ternera (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  this ips rank of in countries 36.37.233.192 (talk) 10:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete doesn't seem notable enough to have an article and also seems promotional. Ternera (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  I think that, if this article is promotional guy well try upload personal img or some photos of him. But this article I seem just added text and add photo in simple wiki. I lack for community guidelines also join conversation.i have no idea. 36.37.204.152 (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  you know Ip votes are not counted right? Cactus ^{spiky ouch} 11:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Disabled, Not Half a Human Being

Disabled, Not Half a Human Being (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

זור987 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think that User:Dorian Gray Wild trying to promote this organization outside Israel. And this organization have no encyclopedic importance outside Israel, in contrast to its founder, Alex Fridman, and this isn't acceptable. The equivalent English Wikipedia article has been deleted with a purposed deletion because of my same reasons. זור987 (talk) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Dear Wikipedians, the discussion is about the page, not about me.
  

In the English Wikipedia there is a page about Alex Fridman.

I did not discuss the request for deletion of Disabled, Not Half a Human Being. Therefore, it was deleted.

A request for a quick deletion has been submitted, and Fehufanga wrote: "There is no policy that prohibits users from writing articles about Israeli organizations".

In the Simple Wikipedia, there is no page about Alex Fridman. It was also suggested to delete "Alex Fridman" in the English wikipedia, but it was declined.

I am not a member of this association.

The organization has raised the disability allowances of the disabled people in Israel, no matter which religion they had. It is written in the page: "Lobbying and legislation in the Israeli Knesset".

Therefore it is recommended to keep the page. Dgw (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Although true that "There is no policy that prohibits users from writing articles about Israeli organizations" that is irrelevant. The question is whether the page is notable. As it is restricted to Israelis, I say it is not notable. All round the world there are people who are disabled. War may be one of the leading causes. As far as I know, all countries support injured people. What is strange or unusual about that? Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

We have plenty of articles about organisations bound to one country. Most activists and politicians confine their activities to their home country. That is not relevant to the question of whether they are notable. There seem to be 3 reasonably independent sources here. Fridman and the organisation he created seem to be notable. Rathfelder (talk) 19:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

• Comment - it seems like no such article has been up for Deletion, at En-wiki. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Disabled,_Not_Half_a_Human_Being .--However, i can not see a clear case of the organisation being wiki-notable on simple-wiki. 2001:2020:341:D118:7D25:4D50:8B80:E9DA (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

  That just shows that nothing currently links to the page, which doesn't indicate whether it existed. It actually did exist. It was deleted via enwiki's prod process on 29 July 2023 at 15:07 UTC. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• Thank you Macdonald-ross and Rathfelder for your replies.
  

The organization raised the pension from NIS 2,342 ($660) to NIS 4,500 ($1,270). I added it to the page, with the relevant sources. It is also written in the page: "The organization was established in April 2016 [...] as a protest to the wear of the disability pension in Israel for more than 15 years."

Whataboutism is not accepted in Wikipedia.Dgw (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Tristan van der Vlis

Tristan van der Vlis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated as 'A4-not notable', this is about a 24-year old, who committed the en:Alphen aan den Rijn shopping mall shooting, in 2011. After shooting a few people, the perpetrator committed suicide. Personally, I think that committing a crime does not confer notability. As always, if we had the article about the shooting (we currenlry don't) we might consider keeping this in some form. As it needs discussion, I am bringing it here. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - not inherited notability, we should be careful not to give great prominence to perpetrators of crimes. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nominator and Lee Vilenski; people like this are not notable at all and, if I am being honest, they deserve to be forgotten. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 08:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete article has no reliable sources to show how this person is notable. Ternera (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Bobon Santoso

Bobon Santoso (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 03:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Is this data less valid, even though he is a YouTuber with 16 million subscribers? if not notability is fine, I'm just expressing my opinion —This unsigned comment was added by 114.10.139.107 (talk • changes) 04:45, 29 June 2024‎ (UTC) (UTC)

  The number of subscribers a YouTuber has does not have bearing on their notability. --Ferien2 (talk) 08:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, non-notable spam. Кронас (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Pretty blatantly promotional.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Niels Vernooy

Niels Vernooy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is questionable at best. Ternera (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Fails WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 03:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Consensus that these topics do not meet our notability guideline. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 05:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

HD 269112

HD 269112 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:WP:NASTRO --Ferien (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

On reviewing this further, I've realised there are many more of these articles than I initially expected (79 in total for those counting) and that more explanation should probably be added to this nomination statement. All of the above articles are articles that 1) are mass-created by the now-blocked IP, 47.186.42.50, 2) have no corresponding enwiki article (exc HD 269700 where it is a redirect) and 3) have very few online sources available making these clear failures of w:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete fails w:WP:NASTRO and I don't think all of these stars are important enough to warrant their own articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ternera (talk • contribs) 21:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. Wiki-notability has largely not been shown. 2001:2020:345:A57A:CCB8:F39D:CE66:9C82 (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC) / 2001:2020:345:A57A:CCB8:F39D:CE66:9C82 (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete all. Nearly all of these have a single source from something along the lines of "list of", "catelog of", etc. None of these show notability per gng or nastro. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete We are not the complete guide to all the planets, stars and moons. We are Wikipedia.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 05:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as not really notable. The fact that the only sources we can find are lists/catalogs is because this is only notable for a list/catalog of space objects. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete certainly fails w:WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

  I cant see that articles like this are helpful. Rathfelder (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per nom and everyone above - fails w:WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: Shouldn’t This be Quick Deleted for Little or no Meaning? Milanjan10 (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

  These sorts of articles aren't eligible for A1. Even articles just saying "X is a Y" aren't eligible for A1 because they do have some sort of meaning, even if it doesn't go into significant detail. --Ferien2 (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: Macdonald-ross A4'd one of the pages (HIP 18696) despite A4 not covering places or stars.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests