Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFD)
Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

[change source]
Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

[change source]
Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

[change source]
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

[change source]
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

[change source]

Modern Catholic antisemitism (disambiguation)

[change source]
Modern Catholic antisemitism (disambiguation) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rsk6400 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A redirect should not be called "disambiguation". Rsk6400 (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hola Fidel

[change source]
Hola Fidel (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other please check I am not wrong Ksy 08:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 08:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


India proper

[change source]
India proper (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Should be re direct with Hindustan page Other please check on this Ksy 08:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: India proper is a historical term, which is different from "Hindustan" it was used in british era to refer to Indian Empire without Burma and ceylon, Baluchistan.
I will be adding more into the article 2409:4080:EEBE:CC9B:E83E:FA44:3B36:CA5C (talk) 11:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i have made more chances and expanded the article a bit, Hindustan article itself is a disambugation. 2405:201:200F:7157:3DDD:5DEF:8B1D:2113 (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Picture_of_India_Geographical_Historical/KEw5AQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22india+proper%22&pg=PA46&printsec=frontcover
source mentions India proper as synomous to Hindustan proper not to Hindustan....!! 2405:201:200F:7157:3DDD:5DEF:8B1D:2113 (talk) 11:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 08:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The Adamita Family

[change source]
The Adamita Family (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
The Lacy Family (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

2601:644:8184:F2F0:947A:B508:2101:97EA has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Both of these pages are unencyclopedic trivia. 2601:644:8184:F2F0:947A:B508:2101:97EA (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 08:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rutlege

[change source]
Rutlege (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

207.62.246.71 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article seems to be a hoax. 207.62.246.71 (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]
  •  Delete I would have A6d it just because of Rutlege is presumed to be related to [1]John Baldwin, Not related to John Baldwin, the founder of Baldwin City, KS. Their relation is due to sightings near Baldwin City, Kansas being common for both entities.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rollemberg Ivan

[change source]
Rollemberg Ivan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not A4 eligible, but also the subject of the article does not seem to meet any notability requirements whatsoever. Of the sources, they are all promotional in nature. Griff (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 02:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Samuel Cate Prescott

[change source]
Samuel Cate Prescott (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a disambiguation page - We don't have an article for Samuel Cate Prescott and the Samuel Prescott that's linked there makes no mention of the "Cate" middle name so seems a pointless disambiguation, As far as I'm aware there's no applicable QD hence this RFD but if anyone wants to speedy delete I'd have no objections, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 01:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 01:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chawar Dynasty

[change source]
Chawar Dynasty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

207.62.246.71 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Should be deleted per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chawar Dynasty. 207.62.246.71 (talk) 00:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 00:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Raja Chawarsen

[change source]
Raja Chawarsen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

207.62.246.71 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Should be deleted per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chawar Dynasty. See also Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Chawar Dynasty. 207.62.246.71 (talk) 00:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 00:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chieftain of Zelian

[change source]
Chieftain of Zelian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source Iranian112 (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Siege of Diyarbakir (1514)

[change source]
Siege of Diyarbakir (1514) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source Iranian112 (talk) 10:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]
  • Comment Deleting on the base of sources not attached might be a little unfair for this Historical page. I would rather advise to improve the article as it is of informative nature. Best regards,--Pot 08:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Massacre of Ganja(1606)

[change source]
Massacre of Ganja(1606) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No source Iranian112 (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Eurphrates-Tigris Expedition

[change source]
Eurphrates-Tigris Expedition (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No source,This is just propaganda Iranian112 (talk) 10:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Massacre of Ganja

[change source]
Massacre of Ganja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source Iranian112 (talk) 10:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sack of Tabriz

[change source]
Sack of Tabriz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:Poor resources are used,This page is just propagandaIranian112 (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Poor resources are used,This page is just propaganda


Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman

[change source]
Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No source,This is just propaganda Iranian112 (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Massacre of Salmas

[change source]
Massacre of Salmas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source Iranian112 (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:36, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Sinjar (1516)

[change source]
Battle of Sinjar (1516) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:No sources,This is quite honestly just propaganda usedIranian112 (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC) 10:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battle of Qahrawa

[change source]
Battle of Qahrawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:Without sources, this is a stub article Iranian112 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 15:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC) 23:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of battles involving Kurds

[change source]
List of battles involving Kurds (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Setergh has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is insanely biased to the Kurds, practically only showing their victories when this is clearly not the case. There's also no references to support all these random battles which could easily be made-up. The page is poorly made (with some weird errors and grammar problems), along with including massacres for whatever reason?? This seems like some insane Kurd nationalism not used for good purposes in the slightest. This page deserves no place anywhere. Setergh (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 18:10, 3 March 2025 (UTC) 23:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


International Association of Top Professionals

[change source]
International Association of Top Professionals (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

24.130.150.141 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable organization. No significant coverage. 24.130.150.141 (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 19:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Maurice Mobetie

[change source]
Maurice Mobetie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is Like a CV for subject with No Notability to Proof Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 09:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 09:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ghlagatin (blogger)

[change source]
Ghlagatin (blogger) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other Check if I am not wrong Ksy 09:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 09:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sameer Shah

[change source]
Sameer Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Just Promotion of subject Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 09:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.[reply]

Discussion

[change source]
Not Allowed to remove the RFD tag by yourself, Only the admin has right to remove the tag until the decision is made Ksy 12:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~~ Top Gun X 4 (talk) 15:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sorry my bad! Top Gun X 4 (talk) 15:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lets discuss regarding the issues. Top Gun X 4 (talk) 15:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will begin, The Citations Added, Other Links added for clarification, No mistake of spellings, Perfect Grammar, Perfectly Managed and aligned, Designed perfectly, easy English, no slang languages or violation of anyone's personal spaces or discrimination of anyone's personality. Top Gun X 4 (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Stubborn Fat

[change source]
Stubborn Fat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

192.83.149.205 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: ChatGPT article made to advertise mitolyn (see 2 external links). I originally nominated this for QD but the QD tag was moved by another editor, and I believe the policy says that QD cannot be used if not everyone agrees. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 23:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


HMS Sword Dance

[change source]
HMS Sword Dance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability and most of content is just copy paste from Eng wiki Other please check if I am not wrong. Ksy 05:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chambial (caste)

[change source]
Chambial (caste) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Glane23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not supported. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline>. Much of the article is unsourced, and many facts are not supported by the references cited as sources. Reads more like a political manifesto than a historical article. Language does not appear to be standard, simple English. Glane23 (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 13:41, 2 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sushant Sinha

[change source]
Sushant Sinha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Translation of the sources suggest that they are either routine coverage or are not significant. No significant coverage elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 00:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The End Weeknd

[change source]
The End Weeknd (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 17:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kamibekami

[change source]
Kamibekami (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Just a Promotion of subject with no Notability Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 12:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 12:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Toula Gordillo

[change source]
Toula Gordillo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Promotional content Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 12:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 12:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Pahari-Pothwari people

[change source]
Pahari-Pothwari people (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

WarriorBlood1 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There no Ethnic group named Pahari-Pothwari while it is just a variety if Lanhnda (Western) punjabi langauge group. The pahari-pothwari speakers share culture with Punjabi or other nearby ethnic groups. WarriorBlood1 (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 12:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Stephanie Cirami

[change source]
Stephanie Cirami (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 15:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 15:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Boris the Rocket

[change source]
Boris the Rocket (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability enough? BigKrow (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 22:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Salihu Dembos

[change source]
Salihu Dembos (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional for the subject Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 19:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 19:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

[change source]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Quick deleted under G4 and G5, all pages covering a "Zero Defend Security" cybersecurity company should be tagged with QD. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Defend Security (company)

[change source]
Zero Defend Security (company) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un reliable Links and huge Advertisement of Company Other Please check If i am not wrong Ksy 11:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. See also Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Harsh Kumar (voice actor). G11d it.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Kumar Voice Actor

[change source]
Harsh Kumar Voice Actor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Ternera (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 20:52, 5 March 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hudhaifah Goga

[change source]
Hudhaifah Goga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no Notability Found Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 19:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]
  • Hudhaifah Goga is a verry notable person who is a monarch or King of his own books which are read around the world and is registered in many countries political systems and recognized in organizations like CIA FBI Interpol NATO United Nations EU etc and there are many fans who act like his Majesty because of his popularity and just to feel athoritive and cool I guess and not forgetting his accolade of being the peace in palistine that we have today the savior after 100 of years so even though his like rockefeller and rothschild running the foundations of politics without exposing all the work howmuch more notable do you want him to go with his Queens like Queen Emma Watson and Queen Kate Beckinsale etc they are viral Queens next to the King hudhaifah Goga and to us they all celebrities together so if you can't tell a notable celebrity Queen with out king hudhaifah Goga thats a notable celebrity King even without all the notable works and orders mentioned on the page so please don't delete I'm sure you can understand how much fame there is in this name Hudhaifah Goga and importance to politics and the world Thank you
Please don't delete more accolades to come in future as needed by politics and our celebrity Queens G786330 (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hudhaifah Goga has a kids encyclopedia page referanced to his name so when he was young he was notable enough for encyclopedia which is a given because of of being from the Imperial family and a future monarch of the political world now with all these accolades with the political world and celebrities that's on the article how does he become less notable instead of more notable? Please don't delete someone who's already an encyclopedia personal it's just easier to edit his encyclopedia on wekipedia otherwise we have to go into other encyclopedias to edit and add more to his name this will be so much easier please G786330 (talk) 21:47, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definitely not notable. This whole article seems like borderline vandalism. 2601:644:8184:F2F0:1805:E17C:9F3B:75BA (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    But did you do your research and ask around why would everything be on kids encyclopedia if it's doesn't reach encyclopedia requirements I don't think you know how to even research such fame can you even phone wekipedia leave alone a celebrity or presidents unless you a bot and I don't know what criteria wekipedia uses but I saw articles in simple English with no references at all but they stay this article has references and celebraties and political world occurances and it's exposing how the world works instead of all these conspiracy theories that are all lies why don't you go do your research you are an encyclopedia after all if you don't want to trust other encyclopedias instead of reading with disbelief at howmuch fun celebrities and monarchs have in the world and the true political motive of peace love and unity G786330 (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 19:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Da Silva

[change source]
Seth Da Silva (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person; lack of reliable sources BZPN (talk) 17:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]


This request is due to close on 17:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Planate Management Group

[change source]
Planate Management Group (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 20:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 20:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Padmakar Nandekar

[change source]
Padmakar Nandekar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability, Self Published Press releases and Just Promotion of subject Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 20:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 20:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Always Right: The Beginning

[change source]
Always Right: The Beginning (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Just a Promotion of Subject, Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 20:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

This request is due to close on 20:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create

[change source]
Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

24.130.150.141 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is just a direct copy from enwiki and I don't think it should exist, but WP:QD#A3 only applies to articles. 24.130.150.141 (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]
  •  Delete If we're going to import Wikipedia:-space pages from the English Wikipedia it should at least be useful. This is more a humorous page that doesn't help editors. At the very least I can concede with making this a soft redirect but then again, is this a useful title to begin with?— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Not seeing a consensus to delete, whether the article should be merged into another article should be discussed at a more appropriate place now that this RfD has ended.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Nalos (1947)

[change source]
Battle of Nalos (1947) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article has no source and is a stub. Iranian112 (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]
 Keep The request is not proper and the article looks notable to me and we can expand the article and add sources in it, easy right? And we can leave it as that. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼) 07:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adelaideslement8723: Please explain what you think is not proper about this request. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 The nominators request above states "Artile has no sources and is a stub." That is not a proper request for deletion. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼) 05:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Adelaideslement8723: I guess I was looking for why you think that isn't proper. There aren't really any restrictions on the reasons people have for proposing deletion. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you can check About Battle of Nalos in wikipedia there was sources it was not fake this iranian guy may be he wants deleted because just it was kurdish victory this article there was sources 130.193.245.80 (talk) 08:05, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I put other sources In this document I have put it proves how the war was fought 130.193.245.80 (talk) 08:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete There's enough sources that shows the battle did exist, but there's no significant coverage in any of the source, just a couple of lines. Does this warrant a stand-alone article, I question that. It's most appropriate in an article with a larger scope, but not enough for a stand-alone. Ravensfire (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


[change source]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=10105371"