Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Ozhan Akcakaya

Ozhan Akcakaya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional in tone. Awards are not mentioned in the sources and given by sources whose reliability is questionable. No significant, reliable coverage elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jay Feldman

Jay Feldman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Sources are not independent (as clearly written at the end of source 5: This article was written in cooperation with Dr. Jay Feldman), otherwise I found no significant coverage of this subject. Awards don't really make a case for notability either. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alone (Marshmello song)

Alone (Marshmello song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un-encyclopedic tone, non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Comment: I spent 20 minutes on the page, please do not delete it. I can fix it, just tell me what I need to change. 2601:80:C67F:73D0:1593:D13B:CCF2:EB11 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Not Notable Music Article, Unencyclopedic tone, How Users Created Their New Article like this! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non- Notable --Ksy 20:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oceanic International Yoga School Goa

Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is non-notable. the Link mentioned in Reference for only Yoga not about Yoga School GOA. Ksy 19:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: The nominator of this discussion wishes to withdraw their nomination. I am commenting on their behalf, as they have requested me to do so (1). Symonds Gerother (talk)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paolo Petrocelli

Paolo Petrocelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ethn23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's probably a spam interwiki. Deleted also on itwiki and enwiki. This page is exactly the page that was cancelled on enwiki. Read also, if you want, this RdF of itwiki. Ethn23 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi, we currently have Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives and this template. This one is a bit hard to maintain, while the other one is much easier. I think we can simply use Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives on the archive page for navigation. If deleted, I think it will be best if we move the the other list of archive to this title. BRP ^ever 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Reb3l

Reb3l (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable and fails WP:GNG. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 01:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Asteralee

I hope this message finds you well.

My name is Isuru Chamara, and I am the electronic music producer known as REB3L.I understand that Wikipedia has strict notability guidelines, and I have been working diligently to ensure that my page meets those standards. I have made several revisions to the page to improve its tone, structure, and content, and I believe it now provides a more accurate and neutral representation of my career.

I have also been actively seeking more independent sources to strengthen the page's notability, and I am confident that I will be able to provide further evidence of significant coverage in the near future.

I kindly request that you take a look at the revised page and consider my efforts to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to maintaining a neutral and informative page that adheres to Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you

Isuru Chamara Ichamara (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Unreferenced, References Selection are that not references, How users created their articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  i refereneced website Ichamara (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara, You don't referenced website, Please improve your article during discussion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 04:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional, Unreferenced BLP.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  yes i changed the promotional tone and added more references. Ichamara (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara, FusionSub Voted you Delete because you don't improve your articles during discussion, Your article Is Not Notable. your article will deleted in 7 Days when Request is Closed, thank you Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  What do u mean by not notable? Ichamara (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ichamara Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people) for more information. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  His music is in famous techno spotify playlist in Sri Lanka . so pepoles looking for him in google sometimes. He is famous or popular in a small circle. Here is the definition of popular in oxford dictionary (liked or admired by many people or by a particular person or group). Ichamara (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wahhabi Attacks on Najaf (1802-1805)

Wahhabi Attacks on Najaf (1802-1805) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have done a re-search and could not find any reality on this. Other please check if I am not wrong, Ksy 17:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable Conflicts, How they created their article like this, It's not notable Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 05:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Trump Unyielding

Trump Unyielding (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not-notable book. The sources don't appear independent of the subject. Depextual (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

• KEEP The book passes Wikipedia:Notability (books) Specifically Rule 1. I find PML Daily Notable and I also Verified and found that the eBook is still on the amazon bestseller list Editeur16 (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Soap on a Rope

Soap on a Rope (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Encyclopedic content on Wikipedia is expected to have a neutral and formal tone. Terms like "absolute knee-slapper" and references to sensitive topics such as "Prison rape" used for humor are inappropriate and do not align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on tone and sensitivity. Such language could make the article feel biased or trivializing rather than factual. Symonds Gerother (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The article is sourced and I have removed the offending text. The capitalization should be changed, however. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The Article is notable.--Ksy 18:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NBC June 04, 2002 Schedule Lineup

NBC June 04, 2002 Schedule Lineup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: like a directory, not relevant for Wikipedia Depextual (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete WP:NOT.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aladdin and Jasmine

Aladdin and Jasmine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No need to have a single article covering two characters, and poor grammar Depextual (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom - We don't have articles for just 2 characters..... Would be better as separate articles, not enough content to separate, thanks, --–Davey2010^Talk 19:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Agreed with nominator.--Ksy 21:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ram Mani Pandey

Ram Mani Pandey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Some Self Published Articles Ksy 18:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable Article, how users created their new articles like this. Delete article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 06:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oladipupo Tijani

Oladipupo Tijani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is just Like a CV with ton of advertisement of Oladipupo seem like editor has close relation with subject with Zero Notability Ksy 18:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

User:Mjrhoades

User:Mjrhoades (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DaneGeld has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: User is using their userpage as a CV, possibly in preparation to write an article about themselves. Not covered by QD so sending to RFD. DaneGeld (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello DaneGeld,

As you probably realize, I am very new to creating a Wiki article. This one was my first attempt to test the waters as it were.

Can you tell me what "Not covered by QD" refers to? Any suggestions?

I do have a full CV on my web site so that is not the intention of my Wiki... however, I am sure I am now yet aware of the flavor of it.

Does this mean my user is deleted or just the page I was working on?

Thanks for your help,

Michael Mjrhoades (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mjrhoades. QD is an abbreviated name for one of our processes for removing things from the site, it refers to "Quick Deletion". Items can only be deleted in this way, if they fall into certain categories, such as not being written in English, if they are written again after being deleted, and so on.

Because this article doesn't fit into those categories, I put it here so that others can make a decision on what they think. Your userpage hasn't been deleted yet, but it will be for other members of the site to vote on, based on what you have on your user page. You however, as a user, will not be deleted because of this.

I hope you will continue to edit here - it can be a little disheartening for someone to see their work being voted on to possibly be removed. Please don't take it personally! Regards to you, Christian DaneGeld (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete G11 as an advert. --–Davey2010^Talk 18:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

User has since blanked the majority of their page so I'd have no objections to their userpage just being blanked. –Davey2010^Talk 21:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Quick Delete Per Davey2010. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sigma male

Sigma male (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Neutral - En-wiki has an article.--Merging into other article, is an idea.--'Nuke' is also an idea, so that one does not have to waste time, evaluating the sources. (Our sources seem to 'not have a good ring' , for now.) 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

  A couple of questions:

  • What is the significance of enwiki having an article?
  • What article do you think this could be merged to?

  -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

  • I added a 'new, first sentence/line', in the article.--I expect to 'sink in', cirka zero more 'effort' into the article (or the Delete discussion).--For now, I am neutral if the article has got to go.--Will the article get 'enough improvements' before this discussion is over? Not likely.--If this post is regarded as somewhat helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:301:DC0D:355B:BD48:51CF:E14A (talk) 22:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA

•  Comment: - "To become a sigma male you need to help 10 people in a maximum of 1 hour", the article says.--Time to have a closer look at 'the [[Nuclear football]'/ Nuclear Football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2020:32B:F22A:BC9D:9EA2:D8C1:9CBA (talk • contribs)
•  Delete. Notable but not encyclopedic in its current form.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep I have changed the article. I did not have the motivation to continue adding more information so if others would like to contribute that is greatly appreciated. I vote keep due to its rise and use within today's culture. – Angerxiety^! 14:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Joseph Williams (singer)

Joseph Williams (singer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article is about Joseph Williams but all the sources are about Sam Williams. There's no proof that Joseph is notable. Depextual (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Notable Article --Scollball92 (talk) 08:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC) user has been globally locked --Lymantria (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete LTA target --Lymantria (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mk Timothy

Mk Timothy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. The article has some refs, but all of them are basically interview masquerading as article, WP:PRIMARY. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Also note that the article has been deleted multiple times from enwiki for various reasons. And the article creator is a sock (see their enwiki contribution). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bhikitia

Bhikitia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable per WP:GNG & WP:ORG. First source used in the article is MENAFN, which is paid news, rest other bengali sources aren’t reliable itself, like random news sites created by random people. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 04:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tombstone (character)

Tombstone (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article has been created from Ban User Ksy 20:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - regardless of who created this, it doesn't meet GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Warkany syndrome

Warkany syndrome (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May have been copied from another website. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: @Asteralee Not they just copied another website, It's an AI Generated Article, You can detect AI Using AI Detector like ZeroGPT or GPT Zero Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete AI Generated and Unreferenced Articles, How users create their articles like this! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete LLM generated, can we just write it in guideline that we can't use AIs/LLMs?- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ahmad J. Naous

Ahmad J. Naous (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and NPROF. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ^ever 17:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shaik AllaBakashu

Shaik AllaBakashu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: These sources all seem to be paid coverage. They are all promotional, and so the subject does not seem to be notable enough for an article here. I also searched on Google and Google News, but found minimal coverage. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep This article should remain on Wikipedia because Shaik AllaBakashu is a notable figure in the Telugu film industry, recognized for his dual contributions as an actor and producer under SAB Creations. His prominent roles in films like Kaveri (2024 movie) and Manoharam, along with his impact on regional cinema and upcoming projects, establish his cultural significance and enduring influence in Indian entertainment [1].

This request is due to close on 15:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vijay Naidu

Vijay Naidu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The sources all appear to be paid coverage, and are promotional. The subject is likely not notable enough for an article here. I have searched Google News and there are some more results, but they are also promotional. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete no significant coverage that is not promotional in nature Yelromcc (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep The article on Vijay Naidu should be retained due to his significant impact as a fintech entrepreneur and network marketing leader in India, recognized through multiple awards like "Entrepreneur of the Year - Fintech." His company, True Vision Training and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., has reached over 100,000 individuals, providing financial literacy and mentorship in underserved communities, which meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for impactful business figures[2].--Symonds Gerother (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep The subject is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuskrey (talk • contribs) 19:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep it looks better article and notable, We don't delete article i voted keep Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dr. Joseph Goodman

Dr. Joseph Goodman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sounds like an advertisement and barely any independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-notable dentist. The sources are all promotional or not independent. Depextual (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lukeny Moço

Lukeny Moço (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated for A4 but has a claim: 'award for best artist in the musical style Kizomba, the Angolan musical genre'. Which by itself isn't enough to make the subject notable. That means this page needs to meet WP:GNG which is unlikely. BRP ^ever 10:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I promise to improve this article, I will cite more reliable sources and organize the article even more Godior lê saint (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Fails WP:GNG. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 14:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

  Hi, I couldn't understand, what do you mean by failure to delete? Marty Friedman Newton (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Dali

Battle of Dali (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "The article is not notable, the term "battle of Dali" seems to be an invented term, it barely cites WP:RS sources, none of the sources exclusively call it a "Pakistani victory" Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portraits Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Jassar Bridge

Battle of Jassar Bridge (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion:"The article is not notable, the term "battle of jassar bridge" seems to be an invented term, it barely cites neutral and WP:RS sources, none of the sources exclusively call it a "Pakistani victory"Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Kishangarh Fort

Capture of Kishangarh Fort (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portrays Mr.Hanes (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Indo-Pakistani war of 1965

Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portrays Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kadhalan

Kadhalan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I dig a quite digging but could not found any notability Ksy 16:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Operation Kahuta

Operation Kahuta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough notability for page Ksy 21:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Fixies

The Fixies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable tv programme, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NTV and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 15:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nominator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuskrey (talk • contribs) 21:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

How many birds and animals in the world

How many birds and animals in the world (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

172.56.195.181 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is not encyclopedic. 172.56.195.181 (talk) 12:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Very un-encyclopedic name and text. --2601:402:4400:3A90:58B8:D3A:4B3:CA51 (talk) 23:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gbolabo Awelewa

Gbolabo Awelewa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable cyber security person, sources in article are short analysis of him basically saying things, Cannot find any indepth sources online, No evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG.

Article is also up for deletion at enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gbolabo Awelewa) –Davey2010^Talk 15:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete non-notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete cross-wiki spam. Lymantria (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nomination. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 16:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yousef Abu Jalboush

Yousef Abu Jalboush (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article had created by sockpuppet users, Same Reason for Al-Hussein SC (Irbid) Fails G5 Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 12:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. Member of Jordanian national team meets NSPORTS. I think the page can be easily fixed.--BRP ^ever 13:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Fixable. --2601:402:4400:3A90:58B8:D3A:4B3:CA51 (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep - Speedy Keep as another blind nomination by this editor. BEBOLD and SOFIXIT apply. –Davey2010^Talk 01:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kamaria

Kamaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ^ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep:@BRPever No sir/ma’am there is no need for the deletion of this page. All the sources I’ve put in are reliable and I’ve also cross checked all the sources that I’ve put in the article, on ground level. They are all a 110% correct. Also the content is written with NPOV as all the things I’ve written is either facts(with backed sources) or an assumption which is almost close to correct. Nlkyair012 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Non-Profit Industrial Complex

Non-Profit Industrial Complex (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Graywalls has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:RS and WP:OR violation. WP:GNG The article is entirely sourced to numerous articles to main Wikipedia not to simply rewrite them in simple English, but using several articles to put together a new concept. Since Wikipedia is not a WP:RS, it can not be used as the foundation for building a new article. Aside from that, it's just a list of ref spams Graywalls (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom Yelromcc (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Comment The creator is globally blocked, and prior to even creating this article, blocked on en.wiki for socking. The other major contributor is a throwaway account with no other contribution. Overall trash article. Graywalls (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Template:1925-26 NHL season by team

Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a group of navigation templates that each have either zero or only one relevant blue link. With so few relevant links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.

Templates included in this request:

• Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2000 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2002 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2004 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2006 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2010 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2015 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:2016 NFL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:NCAA football season navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:NFL team season lists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Notes to closing admin:

• None of these templates appear to have any subpages.
• All of these templates are transcluded on at least one page.

-- Auntof6 (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom Yelromcc (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete the NHL and NCAA ones but Keep the NFL ones as there are 5 blue links on all of them. Remember the headers are valid navigation targets also in a navbox. That being said I feel like we have had discussions in the past that said as long as we have one bluelink in a navbox they are good to go. I can't be bothered to go look for it though thus this comment. -Djsasso (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  The purpose of the NFL templates is to navigate between pages related to different teams. The other blue links are not helpful for that. That's why I said relevant blue links. Blue links in a navbox's headers are often not helpful for its main purpose. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shreya Jain

Shreya Jain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

NXcrypto has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable actress. Fails WP:NACTOR. च҉न҉्҉द҉्҉र҉ ҉व҉र҉्҉ध҉न҉ Chatting 17:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep, She did two lead roles in notable in TV shows. Camilear (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kefas Brand

Kefas Brand (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can’t find many in depth sources online. I believe he fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Davey2010 would you mind assisting and Reviewing on this nomination for deletion of this article Idrisskunle (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

::I would say there's some notability because they're a CEO of a fairly-notable record company[3][4] but I'll let others chime in first, I should also mention the nominator has also nominated the the English Wikipedia article for deletion too. –Davey2010^Talk 13:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

• I was investigating a sock and found this simplewiki article. If I am not wrong, article was created by a sock. Anyway, Delete the article. Lacks independent coverage, fails GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as according to enwiki this was created by a sock farm anyway, Majority of sources are paid advertisements, My comment above regarding notability was also incorrect as unbeknown to me Medium is a blog site so doesn't count towards notability. Fails NACTOR and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 13:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Davey2010 I have been researching about the News refrences on the Articles referenced in the Article and I’ve come to realize they are not blogs but are articles written in mainstream Ugandan media. The articles used are not blogs but newspapers and independent online media with editorial oversight. There's no reason to believe that the sources are A not independent (they have by-lined authors who are journalists) so I don’t think it is a paid promotion. You can kindly search about them online to clarify news papers like “Red paper, Capital Fm, Kampala Dispatch, Kampala Sun, Kampala Dispatch, Scoop Kampala, News Ghana, among others which have referenced the Topic. probably you could look more into and come to a discion. Thank you @Idrisskunle Idrisskunle (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Praven Kenneth

Praven Kenneth (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable media entrepreneur, Majority of sources in the article are either 2-bit mentions or about his company being a sponsor of the Olympics (imho his company is more notable than he is), No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 15:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep the initial search shows reliable sources per link.--Ksy 18:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

  You've just shown exactly what I said above...... 2-bit mentions and more coverage on his company than him.... Please add which sources you believe count towards notability here and which sources are IN-DEPTH and substantial, Thanks–Davey2010^Talk 18:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Non Notable subject. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

LGA 1700

LGA 1700 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too complex and unreferenced. Rathfelder (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Crude humour

Crude humour (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: doesnt merit an article. Rathfelder (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete Article doesnot fulfill Wikipedia's notability citreia. Quite ambiguous!--Ksy 21:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Deletion is not cleanup. "Crude humour" does apply to quite a few situations – and therefore, is ambiguous? – but this doesn't show any failure of notability criteria. The definition is pretty clear. Now we just need to expand on history and particularly notable examples. --Ferien (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep because it exists on enwiki (albeit under a different name) and because "doesnt merit an article" isn't a valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010^Talk 01:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  Its an unreferenced one liner. Better as a dictionary definition. Rathfelder (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  And ?, It's clearly a notable topic so why not be bold and fix it?.... –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip

Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does this merit a separate article? Rathfelder (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Other major wikis have an article on this topic, so I'd argue that it does indeed merit an article.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. G5 only applies if the article was primarily contributed by the banned/blocked user. In this case, Davey2010 had made significant, nontrivial changes to the page days before it was RfDd.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Al-Hussein SC (Irbid)

Al-Hussein SC (Irbid) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There is Article that made by Blocked/Banned Users. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 16:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete under QDG5 Yelromcc (talk) 16:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• delete G5, sock. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep because I have significantly improved it since its creation and because it's on enwiki (en:Al-Hussein SC (Irbid) so it's clearly a notable club .... –Davey2010^Talk 01:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Unused category following recent improvements Peterdownunder (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Category:Fictional television

Category:Fictional television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: What is this category gone for? Is it a category for, like, fictional televisions? Like the one with a big screen in the living room? Apparently not! QuantumFoam66 (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Just a drive by comment - I'm assuming this is supposed to be fictional television shows and is supposed to be similar to en:Category:Fictional television shows? --–Davey2010^Talk 19:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  It probably should be, although currently it just looks like a category for things relating to both fiction and television, not specifically fictional television programmes.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  I agree it did look like a dumping ground tbh, I wanted to ask before keeping in case I was wrong so thanks for reply it's much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  The point is the category's name alone doesn't make good use of English. Besides, a category specifically for things relating to both fiction and television would not be defining. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 13:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep - I've gone ahead and move this category to en:Category:Fictional television shows and have populated it with four articles, I've also removed the articles DC Studios, Hector the Bulldog and Marvel Studios from the old category and have also moved Category:Looney Tunes characters from the old cat to Category:Fictional characters[5], Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  I also apologise if I wasn't supposed to do this while the RFD was still ongoing but it just made sense to do the work now whilst I had the individual articles loaded up as the articles that were at EN I had to search here one by one which takes time and effort so wanted to put that time and effort to good use, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 15:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 19:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Fish bites

Fish bites (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This pages is Non Notable, Not Notable McDonald's food Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 07:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: @Raayaan9911: The article was already at QD. You didn't need to list it here until the QD was addressed. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Auntof6 why, I think is delayed Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Raayaan9911: It was at QD less than one day when you created this RfD. Sometimes it takes a few days, or even a little longer. Don't be in a hurry for things like this. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Auntof6 Okay, If takes longer i Create My requests, I don't hurry again Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  This process takes longer than quick deletion, so it is better to wait for an admin to handle the QD request in the future. Ternera (talk) 15:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ternera, Why takes longer than quick deletion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  Because requests take 7 days to close here. Ternera (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  I need wait for administrator to quick deleting articles. If I found articles but other than quick deletion (RfD) i create request to delete page? Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete as perfect A4 candidate, I don't know why Auntof6 declined the A4 QD given it's been deleted per A4 twice before but anyway it's a non notable food item off of a restaurant menu, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 12:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  I would like to point out that Auntof6 did not decline the QD, but rather Raayaan9911 replaced the QD with an RfD. Depextual (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  They added a category in between my QD and the RFD so I would take that as a decline otherwise why would you add a category to an article you're going to delete?, That being said I appreciate on a technical basis no they didn't decline it and that I guess they could've just been waiting for someone else to decide but then if you had a 100% feeling it was going you wouldn't categorise it.... –Davey2010^Talk 13:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  I don't consider my adding a category to be a decline. I think was working on uncategorized pages at the time, regardless of what else was going on with the article. The category would be needed if the article ends up being kept, so why not go ahead and add it? If I wanted to decline the QD, I would remove the QD template. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  To be fair that's a very fair point you would remove it, You've never been shy in removing CSD tags, Just felt it was a decline at that time but anyway I've struck that sentence, Apologies for the bad faith on my part, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  Not bad faith, just a misunderstanding. :) -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 7:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notablePeterdownunder (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Sarah Schoengood

Sarah Schoengood (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable political candidate. She lost in the Democratic primary election with 5,524 votes (10.0%), per https://ballotpedia.org/Sarah_Schoengood Depextual (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• delete - non notable political candidate. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notablePeterdownunder (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Nikolai Kurbatov

Nikolai Kurbatov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I should start this RfD by noting that this article is without doubt about the Wikipedia user Nikolai Kurbatov, who is an active editor here and on many other Wikimedia projects.

TLDR: Not notable, not enough significant coverage, the sources that are in the article do not establish the subject's notability, or are not reliable.

Extended argument

The subject of this article is not notable. Looking up "Nikolai Kurbatov" on Google yields mostly user-generated sites such as Instagram, IMDb, YouTube, etc., with no significant, independent, and reliable coverage that would demonstrate why the subject is notable. Excluding those sites still does not yield any significant coverage. Looking up his Russian name (Николай Курбатов), I still could not find any significant coverage about the subject. Taking a look at the article itself, it suffers from a lack of good citations. There are several awards listed in the first paragraph but only one is given a citation. According to Google Translate, the citation is for a "letter of gratitude". Sources 2 and 3 are used to cite the claim entered the Europe Book of Records as the mentally disabled person with the largest number of awards. What exactly is the "Europe Book of Records"? Is it the one linked by http://europebookofrecords.com/? I couldn't find anything about this supposed record book, so if it exists I doubt that it is a notable record database. In addition, this is a very specific record category. I don't think that this category lends enough distinctiveness for notability. Sources 4 and 5 are used to cite the claim highest rated movie trailer. Highest rated according to what? According to Google Translate, source 5 says The record was set on August 8, when the video collected more than 12 thousand views. I'm sorry, but 12,000 views is not close to being notable, nor is it a record. Source 4 says His video has gained more than 12 thousand views and about 400 likes on YouTube - it is the highest-rated trailer of Russian production. Unfortunately dislikes have been hidden by YouTube so it's not possible to tell how many dislikes it received. I also doubt the claim "highest-rated trailer of Russian production". Source 7 has a link to what appears to be this video, but it has since been made private. Source 6-10 are a bit excessive to cite the claims "video with the most likes without dislikes on YouTube", "video with the most views without dislikes on YouTube". Source 6 says At the same time, none of the thousands of Internet users gave it a dislike. This is not really that impressive. Before dislikes were you could find a number of videos with thousands of likes and no dislikes, these were usually videos with less than 100,000 views from smaller communities. Source 7 says about another video viewed by almost 18 thousand users without a single dislike, thanks to which its author entered the Russian Book of Records for the second time. This is also not notable. Both videos have since been taken down. Source 8 says "the most liked video without any dislikes" (uploaded in March 2014). So far, none of these sources give any proof for the claims, not even a screenshot. Sources 9 and 10 are interviews, which disqualifies them from being independent from the subject. Now, for the Wikipedia-related claims. There are eleven sources for the claim "the largest number of publications in Wikipedia by one author from Russia". This record is likely the best out of the others for establishing notability. For some reason, source 11-22 all say something similar to this: Nikolay Kurbatov said that he writes his articles from scratch. He writes them in Russian, Italian, English, German, French and many other European languages. In addition, he knows Haitian, Creole and other languages ​​that are unusual for us. You may notice the pattern that some of these records are local or specific, and that coverage about him centers mostly about his records, not a lot about the subject himself. For these reasons, I conclude that the subject is not notable.

It is also worth noting that this article was deleted several times in the past twelve years on the English Wikipedia: en:Nikolai_Kurbatov, and that User:Nikolai Kurbatov is asking one of the deleting admins to restore the page: en:Special:Permalink/1255351778#Nikolai_Kurbatov just a few days before the Simple English Wikipedia article was created. The article was also created and deleted several times on the Russian Wikipedia: ru:Курбатов, Николай Иванович.

@Nikolai Kurbatov: If you are involved in creating this article, then my advice is don't. Please do not write or ask for Wikipedia articles about yourself, as that's a conflict of interest. An article about yourself is not always a good thing for many reasons. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. I am russian (this is not notable nationality) + disabled person. I think that the free and selfless daily work of disabled people should not be valued. Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Nikolai Kurbatov Never did I say that the article should be deleted because the subject is Russian or disabled. There are many other ways that the community can show appreciation for your work. A Wikipedia article could be one of them, but in this case, the article doesn't have enough grounds for notability. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 04:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  I'm not accusing you. I think that the article should be deleted because i am a russian disabled person, otherwise i would have voted to keep it. Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 04:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: This user has canvassed at least two other users to get them to vote "delete" on this RfD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per nikolai. Articles about russians should not be on Wikipedia. 46.146.37.25 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you! Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

• Delete, typical PR/advertising that they stubbornly want to place. Nikolai Kurbatov is trying to confuse the community by calling for voting to delete an article and mentioning his nationality. In Ruwiki, the article was created by a serial spammer. Here is can be same, I recommend check IP's 5.166.174.141, 5.166.167.125, 46.146.20.209 and 46.146.37.25 (is it could be one person). Кронас (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for support! Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 13:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per all above. Yelromcc (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. content alreay exists Peterdownunder (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Filibuster in the United States Senate

Filibuster in the United States Senate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: content does not match the title. Rathfelder (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: "Filibuster" can be the best suggested page name.--Ksy 17:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Move to Filibuster (without a redirect) and tag as a stub. If this isn't an acceptable option, then  Delete. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 15:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Category:Women in music

Category:Women in music (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This wiki doesn't categorize by gender without a specific reason. I don't think there is a good reason to separate people in music by gender. Auntof6 (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete G5, it was created by the same LTA who re-created the same set of categories (see Category:Women in Latin music). User was still blocked under different IPs at the time of the creation, see Special:Contribs/24.46.160.70 and Special:Contribs/2600:4808:9C70:6600:C8DF:FF24:3FE0:84D6, just to name two. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  Relative discussion at: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Category:Women in Latin music; the cat is from the same banned LTA user. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

• Quick Delete C1 and (as Indigo has brought up) G5.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  C1 doesn't apply because the category hasn't been empty for 4 days -- it hasn't even existed for 4 days yet. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per mom Yelromcc (talk) 19:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete G5 per Dream and Fusion. –Davey2010^Talk 23:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Per Davey2010. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete G5 Per Asteralee and Davey2010 Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 01:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 16:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Janmejay Sahu

Janmejay Sahu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per mom Yelromcc (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Farhana Afrin Ayshe

Farhana Afrin Ayshe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Speedy delete per nom, non notable, zero WP:SIGCOV. see also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhana Afrin Ayshe. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Jadidi Alireza

Jadidi Alireza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough in depth sources. Fails WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hello, I think this article is useful and its sources will be deepened over time and with the participation of other people. My suggestion is to remove the delete tag from this article, so that with the participation of other people, this article will be more content and with more resources. Thank you. Ali76567gf (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete this person isn't notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per nom and Lee - Cannot find any evidence of any notability either, Fails NMUSIC and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 13:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

• Quick Delete G11, G5, G4. He has 4 Spotify monthly listeners, I am not kidding. There is nothing to discuss here. I am 100% sure I have already commented on another deletion discussion of this article, because I clearly remember his YouTube and Spotify profiles. I believe that the LTA who keeps re-creating his Wikipedia article is not the singer himself, because, if I am not mistaken, the LTA created other articles for other unknown artists as well. The real singer has probably no idea about this. I wish the real singer all the best, and if he's reading this by any chance, please don't give up! But the article must go. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  Found the previous discussion: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Alireza-Jadidi. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  QD request declined – the last RfD was closed as a quick delete, which doesn't count as a G4. It would be best for us to wait 2 more days for this RfD to be closed. --Ferien (talk) 15:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

  Yeah fwiw I too strongly object to this being speedy deleted purely because there's only 2 more days of RFD discussion left - doesn't seem worthwhile imho –Davey2010^Talk 15:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 14:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete I did a re-search found person is non notable.--Ksy 19:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Bizarro Spar

Bizarro Spar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources here, no article on enwiki. Claim of having a charted song is highly questionable given the lack of sources, lack of specific information and nothing on enwiki. Speedy decllined, AFD created. Ravensfire (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Sources, How users created articles like this, I voted delete Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 22:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete No Sources which make article notable--Ksy 08:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 16:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

TMY Empire

TMY Empire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lymantria has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam or at least not notable. Sources are promotional advertorials full of superlatives. Lymantria (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Bryan Miller

Bryan Miller (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, I couldn't find any significant coverage of the subject. Source 2 is not about the same Bryan Miller. Others are just passing mentions. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Delete as per nominator NO- notability Found--Ksy 19:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 16:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Vaidam Health

Vaidam Health (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Also enwiki deleted their article due to lack of notability (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidam Health), Fails NCORP and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 17:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Quickly deleted (A6) by Fr33kman. 2620:6E:6000:2900:9051:DD3B:6B0B:8F5B (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Panda And Duck

Panda And Duck (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Quick WP:BEFORE, couldn't find anything. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete, Page are Fake and No information in Google Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 20:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Hoax. 2601:402:4400:3A90:1A65:8685:647F:29F3 (talk) 20:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Hoax - Tagged as such as an IP keeps making Jesus Adrian SLU and SLU related articles all of which are made up. –Davey2010^Talk 01:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Notable Australian politician Peterdownunder (talk) 10:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

David Pocock

David Pocock (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unreferenced sentence about a living person. No explanation of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete This might be a troll Article and nonsense. 2604:3D09:AF84:5900:8960:20F4:78B7:D7C (talk) 01:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete - I'm sure I've seen a "David Pocock" pop up as a fake name in an article. Either way delete for either being a hoax or vandalism. –Davey2010^Talk 01:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not established Peterdownunder (talk) 10:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Darul Uloom Ahle Sunnat Qasimia Madrasa

Darul Uloom Ahle Sunnat Qasimia Madrasa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no claim of notability, and no references. Rathfelder (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: need sources to fulfill WP:Notability criteria. Or else delete per nom.--Ksy 21:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Fails WP:GNG/w:WP:NORG with a complete lack of reliable independent sources on the article or elsewhere and, therefore, w:WP:NSCHOOL. --Ferien (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Quickly deleted by BRPever as advertising. 131.109.225.17 (talk) 18:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Pamela N. Furr

Pamela N. Furr (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. The sources are basically all paid coverage. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. fr33kman 17:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Adultphilia

Adultphilia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Long, complicated, unreferenced and tendentious. Rathfelder (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete is what i am leaning toard.--"Long, complicated, unreferenced and tendentious", 'says it all'. 2001:2020:317:B4E4:A9FC:C6B:E25:8EAD (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think its just complicated I could understand what I was reading, and there's a reference links where this person get this from. Name what it says it came from urban dictionary and references where it came from (Psychological institutes) proving those individuals had problem with this kind of ,,sexuality to adults". i think its just need More simpler explanation and doesn't need to be deleted. Also Social media was also a big move because how content creators brain washed the kids giving them explicit content. Its interesting and new article and thanks to it im gonna be more aware as adult and parent. Saltycat996 (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Clearly AI-written so a bad foundation to start any constructive article off. Blow it up. --Ferien (talk) 21:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think Doing research with ai isnt prohibited? i dont mind it gave quite nice links and explanation what i could understand, its just little bit to complciated. Someone needs to simplfy this i guess. Saltycat996 (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  Using AI isn't specifically prohibited by our content policies – at least, not yet – however as I mentioned, simply asking it like this is not a great base for the article to start off. AI, imo, can play a role in aiding content creation, using it to search sources online for instance, as opposed to replacing editors entirely. This article is not formed like an encyclopedia article usually is here, and does not follow our Manual of Style. Overall, I feel it would be significantly more effort to create an article out of this than to simply restart, and I don't believe that this term, "adultphilia", is used often in sources. --Ferien (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete seems like AI generated.NXcrypto Chatting 18:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete This article was AI Generated Content and Unreferenced that i detected it Using AI Detector, How they created articles like this, I think is generated without reference by ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Copilot or Anything Else!, If they interested AI, Just ask a ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Copilot Or Anything Else Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 14:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete formatting shows that it was written by a LLM/AI.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. fr33kman 17:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Fabio Mancini

Fabio Mancini (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks many substantial reliable sources. Likely doesn't meet WP:GNG either. BRP ^ever 18:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The deletion log on the Italian Wikipedia (it:Fabio Mancini (modello)) speaks for itself. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 22:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

  It was also nominated for deletion twice on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabio Mancini (2nd nomination)), notice how most "Keep"s are from users who made few or no other edits outside that topic. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 22:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

  The article being deleted on another Wikipedia is not a reason to delete it here. We don't know what was in the other article. It might not have had anything showing notability, but the article here might show it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep as the subject is notable enough and is one of Armani's long-standing models. He has been recognized as Vogue Hommes' "Best Fitness Models," Out magazine's "50 Hottest Male Models of All Time," and others. He does have reliable independent sources; please recheck, like The Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Vogue France, Out, Vanity Fair, and others. Maybe it needs more reliable sources, but I believe deletion is not the best way here. Wikiwordssmith (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep - As above, the article has good number of references of all type, no need to forget about that. The subject has famous magazines recognitions. --CooksAnna (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom and Dream Indigo - It's been deleted twice once on Enwiki and a staggering 5 times on ItalyWiki so that tells me everything I need to know - nonetheless done a BEFORE search and didn't find anything substantial, Fails NPEOPLE and GNG. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Comment You are wrong here, Davey2010. I don't know if you know how to check or not, but the article was deleted once on EnWiki. And I would only say this in defense of this article that it might lack substantial reliable sources, but I would not use the word "many" for it. Because many of the sources are reliable. Just like Wikiwordssmith mentioned, you are not looking on the bright side here. The L'Officiel magazine source or Out magazine are not reliable? His book was recently published by Rizzoli Libri, and they have it on their official website; it looks notable enough and a reliable source to me. He has a few less reliable sources, so my recommendation would be to remove those sources or put an improvement tag on the article. --CooksAnna (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

It was indeed deleted only once so I've amended that, Releasing a book and being named in a trivial list as "50 Hottest Male Models of All Time" doesn't automatically mean they're notable, The English Wikipedia deemed this as non notable because of lack of INDEPTH coverage which I also agree with.

Lastly please don't make comments such as you are not looking on the bright side here as that could be deemed a personal attack and something you could be blocked for - I'm entitled to my opinion which you're more than welcome to disagree with but making those sorts of comments does you no favours and it doesn't help in this discussion, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 13:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep:Dear @Davey2010 @Dream Indigo @BRPever can I ask how can is possible he have other 14 different pages in many languages and he cannot have an English one? Wiki France Fabio_Mancini_(mannequin) , Wiki German:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini , Wiki Greece: https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Φάμπιο_Μαντσίνι, Wiki Japan: ファビオ・マンチーニ , Wiki Arab: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/فابيو_مانشيني ,Wiki Spanish: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini , Wiki Portugal:https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini , Wiki Korea: https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/파비오_만치니other 6/7 languages if you search on all the pages. The question now is: if he is famous in all over the world, recognised worldwide ( the other 14 wiki pages describes perfectly ) WHAT IS THE PROBLEM??????????? 2409:40F2:2098:41E5:251C:B318:4D2A:3A10 (talk) 07:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  You'll get nowhere yelling at us WHAT IS THE PROBLEM???????????, please read this if you don't know why I said "yelling", thank you. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 08:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  I'LL TELL YOU THE PROBLEM; The other Wikipedias don't have any standards and or there's not enough editors to check articles whereas here and the English Wikipedia we patrol new changes/pages every day so new articles are picked up 10x quicker, Once you create an article on a non-English Wikipedia it stays without being checked or even noticed. –Davey2010^Talk 13:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  ‘’Keep’’ @Dream Indigo @Davey2010 : FROM WIKIPEDIA: Wikipedia is a free content online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers, known as Wikipedians, through open collaboration and the wiki software MediaWiki.

  To be verifiable; if no reliable (he do have a lot!!!!!!) in every language - , independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. ‘’Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice.’’ Can you please explain us of this famous top model is everywhere ONLINE in GOOGLE why he cant be on wiki English? A guy Who make the history of fashion, this is literally with NO sense. I think i will write to Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger for yours Indecent behaviour. 2409:40F2:2098:41E5:14FF:2FD4:1A54:6A1D (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  Please read en:WP:Notability and en:WP:INDEPTH, Good luck with that - I look forward to reading what Jim has to say about us upholding core policies here and not letting Simple be overrun with spam :). Whilst you're at it go read en:WP:BLUDGEON. –Davey2010^Talk 14:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you for explaining Davey and me what Wikipedia is, we didn't know it. I still vote delete, thank you. And the thousands of pictures aren't what makes somebody notable. Fame ≠ Notability. Hope this helps. Good luck with that email to the Wikipedia Gods. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 15:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Dream Indigo I think it's safe to say Jimmy and the WMF have far more important issues to deal with than us :), I think we'd be at the bottom of that very long list of problems :) –Davey2010^Talk 15:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete clear delete, no reliable sources cover the subject. --IWI (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

  550.000 picture of him in google cane from NO reliable sources? So all the people who reconize him are crazy?? Can you explain? Fabio Mancini

  https://g.co/kgs/BtHnvrS

  2409:40F2:2098:41E5:14FF:2FD4:1A54:6A1D (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete - As IWI mentions, this is a clear delete. There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources, to give any notability to the subject of this article. It fails both NPEOPLE and the General Notability Guidelines. Needs to go. DaneGeld (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  Same for you, this is not enough? 550.000 images and articles are not reliable? I think you should be and more easy to open wiki to all to give more good info and not only write what u want! Open your eyes Fabio Mancini

  https://g.co/kgs/BtHnvrS

  2409:40F2:2098:41E5:14FF:2FD4:1A54:6A1D (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

  No, it's not enough for me. Sorry. @Davey2010: @Dream Indigo:, this might interest you... Funnily enough, this "550,000" images thing, was also bought up on the English Wikipedia when the article was nominated (and subsequently removed). What is so important to this, and the other IP (on the same range, I might add), that they want this article on here? Are they annoyed it was removed from the English Wikipedia? I have other ideas, but to avoid prejudicing myself, I won't add those on here. Remembering the civility guidelines, I'll stay quiet now. DaneGeld (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

• Open your eyes, thank you: Fabio Mancini

https://g.co/kgs/BtHnvrS

2409:40F2:2098:41E5:14FF:2FD4:1A54:6A1D (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: Moved comment down. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 20:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Oceanic International Yoga School

Oceanic International Yoga School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable organization, no significant coverage from reliable independent sources. The sources for the awards are bogus or unreliable. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Old Allman

Old Allman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Badly put-together mish-mash of en:Old High German and en:Lombardic Language that tries to present itself as a language. As far as I know, there hasn't been a proposed common ancestor for the Allemanic languages, that is, Upper German varieties spoken around Southwestern Germany, as opposed to the other Upper German varieties spoken in Austria and Bavaria. Indeed, they all can be traced back to Old High German, but I haven't found any reliable sources for a more immediate ancestor of the Allemanic languages. The spelling Allman seems to be some sort of overetymologizing. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Nasirnagar Ashutosh Pilot High School

Nasirnagar Ashutosh Pilot High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, The school also has 3 articles; the first article contains no sources and is in a draft state, the second article does have sources however these are all LOCALCOVERAGE, The third article contains no sources and barely any content for that matter, I've not found anything better online, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Rohanpur A. B. Government High School

Rohanpur A. B. Government High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, There is an article on another Wikipedia here however the sources are "Top Ten Schools in the district" or "Banglapedia", I've found nothing better online, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG, –Davey2010^Talk 20:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Maria Cristina National High School

Maria Cristina National High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 19:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Daotian Middle School

Daotian Middle School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Sources in article are directories, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 19:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment - no en-wiki article, if anyone were to ask.--DEL seems fine. 2001:2020:313:BD7C:4102:DB48:FE31:B64C (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  @2001:2020:313:BD7C:4102:DB48:FE31:B64C, Fwiw for any article I nominate I always check enwiki first, Some schools were on enwiki which is why I've not nominated them :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

• Delete - Personally speaking, I'd put this through for quick deletion under A4, as a service which does not claim notability. It's a school. There are lots of them, and this one's only claim is that it was burned down, and rebuilt. Not notable at all. DaneGeld (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  @DaneGeld Unfortunately A4 is only reserved for people, groups, companies, products, services or websites - I'm not sure a school would come under a company. Unfortunately I've had a few A4's declined because they're not related to the A4 criteria hence coming here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Davey2010 - I don't think of it as a company, but as a service. Schools are services provided by authorities, to support education. Anyhow, I'm not going to QD it, because I asked admins to check to see if it had been QD'd before, and they said to leave the RFD up. It's been on here a year, and another week isn't going to hurt! Thank you - DaneGeld (talk) 22:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

  @DaneGeld Oh good point I didn't think of it like that, Okay no worries I was going to say I had no objections to you speedying it but just seen your ANI post so I won't lol, Anyway take care, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Humans from Lloyd In Space

Humans from Lloyd In Space (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Some list of characters from something. Clearly not relevant. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not encyclopedia material. Ternera (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Nottingham cheese week

Nottingham cheese week (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

131.109.227.10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. But interestingly there was an event in Nottingham involving cheese. 131.109.227.10 (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not seeing any sources online to support this claim. Ternera (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Hasan Abdal

Battle of Hasan Abdal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a battle of 1917, in the context of World War I. Originally this was nominated for quick deletion, but no reason was provided. What I see from the page history is that some work was done on it. Without too much search, I find an en:Battle of Hasan Abdal (1813), but obviously that's a century earlier. The article itself has sources, and was created/edited by a user several times. So, dear community, shoul we keep or delete this one? Eptalon (talk) 21:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-notable, only books reference? Delete then Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 10:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete the whole article is entirely based on a single source however the source itself doesn't mention something called "Battle of Hasan Abdal" --Mr.Hanes (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Simon Duffy

Simon Duffy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article might be considered for deletion if Simon Duffy does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians, as not all of his work has substantial independent coverage from reliable sources. Without in-depth, independent sources detailing his impact or influence beyond chart listings and collaborations, the article may lack the verifiability and significant coverage needed to establish notability. Symonds Gerother (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: en:Simon Duffy is about another person...--Eptalon (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Template:Latest NASCAR Xfinity

Template:Latest NASCAR Xfinity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template related to racecar drivers. Enwiki doesn't have one with this name, but they have a similar one, en:Template:Latest NASCAR Busch. However, the enwiki one is used, but ours is not. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980

Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating three unused sports-related navigational boxes because they each have too few blue links in the body to do the job of a navigational box.

Templates included in this request:

• Template:Greece squad UEFA Euro 1980 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Italy football squad 1920 Summer Olympics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Latvia squad UEFA Euro 2004 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Note that the templates for UEFA Euro are linked to, but they have no transclusions and are therefore unused. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. BRP ^ever 11:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots

Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating 5 unused navbox templates that each have either no blue links in the body, or only one blue link in the body. Without more blue links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.

The templates included in this request are:

• Template:Campaignbox 1929 Palestine riots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Campaignbox Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Hudson Valley Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Kerala Film Critics Award for Best Debut Actor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Template:Konsta songs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Note about Template:Hudson Valley Radio: This template has links, but no transclusions. It has links because this template and others for radio stations in the New York Metropolitan Area all link to each other. You can see that at the bottom of this template, where there are blue and red links to other radio station templates. Auntof6 (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests