Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Nambudiri

Nambudiri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ieditrandomarticles has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is no where near Simple English. This text is very complex and at points does not make any sense (at least to me) Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 02:16, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aaron Farrell

Aaron Farrell (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

202.36.254.250 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable cricketer for a non-notable cricket team. The only source regarding this person is already cited. 202.36.254.250 (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Comment: Note to administrators: This was originally added to the Bottom of the page instead of the Top of the page. I have just moved it up. Thanks :) Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC) This request is due to close on 23:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oy, pri luzhku

Oy, pri luzhku (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable song, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSONG and GNG,

Should also point out there are articles at de.wikipedia, fr.wikipedia, lv.wikipedia, no.wikipedia, ru.wikipedia and uk.wikipedia which were all created by the creator (and as we know there's next to none moderation on the lesser known sites compared to here and enwiki), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Looks like a "revenge" after my "undo" of his strange "deletion". And nothing more. Nowhere in other language project any user proposed such "approach" to this article. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Wrong. Your undo brought my attention to the article and then made me wonder whether this song was notable or not which is why I went searching and then nominated the article for deletion when I found out it wasn't.

"Nowhere in other language project any user proposed such "approach" to this article" - Again that's because those projects are less-moderated / more lax than here and or the English Wikipedia. Had you created this at the English Wikipedia it would've gone the same way, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• • German, French, and Russian projects are less-moderated? Well, try to do the same within one of those three projects, and we will see your results. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
  • This is a traditional folk song, both in Russia and Ukraine, in both languages (first published in 19 century). How may you dare to speak of its importance or notability, having no experience with that stuff? --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

    I'll save you the bother of searching my edits; Some projects don't have an AFD procedure at all (some have an importance tag and that's it) and those that do have an AFD procedure I've been reverted on (still have no idea why) - I will happily tell you my record with AFD/CSD on those projects is exceptionally poor because of the aforementioned reasons above. My record here and on the English Wikipedia on the other hand is great.

    Editors don't need experience in a topic to determine whether it's notable or not. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Here are only three of its prominent performers: 1, 2, 3. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

    Singers singing a song doesn't automatically make it notable, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

    • There are enough of sources for the song and its history (including its performance in that movie; 1). And what might make a traditional folk song notable (moreover, automatically), in your opinion? --Tamtam90 (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

      I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability so I'll stop replying and will allow others to judge too, Have a great day, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Atta Ullah Khan

Atta Ullah Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has a claim of notability but I can't find this name anywhere so I don't know if it's accurate. TagUser (talk) 22:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I can't find any evidence that this is the name of the person who shot Malala Yousafzai. Even though this name is mentioned on her article here. TagUser (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete short article, doesn't have any references and non-notable. Raayaan9911 11:08, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Reconquest of Lalish

Reconquest of Lalish (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is Created by a blocked or banned user Iranian112 (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete Support per nom. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of wars involving Bohtan Emirate

List of wars involving Bohtan Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no references to support all these random battles which could easily be made-up. The page is poorly made Iranian112 (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

John's Lair

John's Lair (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable TagUser (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non notable. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 11:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SMG4 Movie: Meggy’s Destiny

SMG4 Movie: Meggy’s Destiny (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The author was blocked yesterday, and their articles related SMG4 unfortunately are not suitable for Wikipedia. This article relies on only one source, it's a little insulting to them since there's so much text here, however it might as well be copied from Fandom.com. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I just checked page about the same subject on Fandom.com, turns out much of the next including "The movie starts off with..." is copied! Could've tagged this with speedy deletion for copyvio instead. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete fails GNG - article's only source is Fandom. Ternera (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SMG4 Movie: 10 Year Anniversary Special

SMG4 Movie: 10 Year Anniversary Special (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources/non notable subject. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Araz Budagov

Araz Budagov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yousiphh has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable person. Most references lack links and are hard to analyze. And also Azerbaijani Wikipedia is up for deletion because of lack of notability. Yousiphh (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: Not listed properly in RfD extended time and posted in Rfd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enfcer (talk • contribs) 12:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC) 12:36,2 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Behzad Qasemi

Behzad Qasemi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --IWI (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete: per nominator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 22:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• Soft keep It seems to have some independent coverage Onyeeze2024 (talk) 00:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  I dont think there is such thing as a soft keep. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Cactusisme: I think you're right. Maybe Onyeeze2024 meant "weak keep." -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Templates using ParserFunctions

Category:Templates using ParserFunctions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

173.167.103.171 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There's really no point in having a category to include all templates that use ParserFunctions. This category was deleted on English Wikipedia in 2008: [1] 173.167.103.171 (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete we already have m:ParserFunctions on meta-Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jaysuavemusic

Jaysuavemusic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete fails WP:GNG-Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 11:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sara Torres (MissChia)

Sara Torres (MissChia) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fabiano Moraes

Fabiano Moraes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think they fail GNG, lack of in-depth coverage --IWI (talk) 13:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Afghanistan–Pakistan border conflicts

Afghanistan–Pakistan border conflicts (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Small article, with references; contested quick-deletion. There is an Enwp article en:Afghanistan–Pakistan border conflicts, but it also seems to have quality issues. Since this is a contested quick-deletion, I propose to go through the regular deletion process instead. So, comments welcome... Eptalon (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep - that is what i am leaning toward.--One reason (but with a somewhat difficult idea about why), to keep the article is that we (and En-wiki), also have article "Afghanistan–Pakistan clashes (2024–present)"; That article is (arguable, and 'largely' a) subset of article "Afghanistan–Pakistan border conflicts".--Note: i usually never improve articles that are having talks about Delete; FWIW, I expect to do c. nothing with this article, until this discussion about "Afghanistan–Pakistan border conflicts", is resolved.--AfD is not meant for improving articles.--A quick closing by administrator, is in order! 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:2CFE:5DFF:BF2E:7EE3 (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - The other article Afghanistan–Pakistan clashes (2024–present) has more details than this one, and thus it doesn't make sense to keep this article unless it's being expanded into previous conflicts. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 23:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

  "My" article (with infobox) has a scope of years,
  1949–50
  1960–61
  1973–92
  2007–present.--"Your" article deals only with year 2024 and this year (and some future years): Apples and oranges (and i will not work on this article while Delete talk is ongoing).--Come to think of it: "your" article can be merged into this one; The other way around is not possible (cuz of the range of years). 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:2CFE:5DFF:BF2E:7EE3 (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:8355:B9EA:2CFE:5DFF:BF2E:7EE3

This request is due to close on 07:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lara McAllen

Lara McAllen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Photochromic ink

Photochromic ink (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of wars involving Soran Emirate

List of wars involving Soran Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no references to support all these random battles which could easily be made-up. The page is poorly made Iranian112 (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tropical Storm Peter

Tropical Storm Peter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, no impacts on land A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @A1Cafel: I think this is the same storm as in Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Tropical Storm Peter (2003), but this article should be deleted instead of redirected because it could confused with Tropical Storm Peter in 2021. 173.167.103.171 (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• Disambiguate as there seem to be multiple tropical storms named Peter.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• Dabify and remove the hatnote to this article in 2003_Atlantic_hurricane_season. We can make a new redirect that includes the year and links to 2003_Atlantic_hurricane_season#Tropical_Storm_Peter. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chicken jockey (2nd nomination)

Chicken jockey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated rubbish TagUser (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Written like an essay Justjourney (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

  ...and no sources. Justjourney (talk) 04:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete: go with proposer. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete per A4 MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete : AI slop --Tili.cili (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete --Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 11:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - Delete per nominator Onyeeze2024 (talk) 23:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete per comments above - this page has also been deleted 5 other times this month. Ternera (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:55, 30 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

IndusGuru Network Partners LLP

IndusGuru Network Partners LLP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:NCORP - no good sources with significant coverage of the company, just some puff churnalism, database type pages and passing mentions. Ravensfire (talk) 01:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:49, 30 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Monetenfuchs

Monetenfuchs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable company. Ternera (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Article seems promotional, searching up the company returns nothing but their personal blog. – Angerxiety^! 17:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete: Spam, deleted 9 times per https://spamcheck.toolforge.org/by-domain?q=monetenfuchs.de. --Achim55 (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete : I found nothing concrete on Google search. Onyeeze2024 (talk) 00:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:12, 29 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hank Pym (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

Hank Pym (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated the below pages for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated articles, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 10:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hank Pym (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Barry Allen (DC Extended Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Justin Hammer (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Pepper Potts (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Heimdall (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Carl Lucas (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Aslan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Nick Fury (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Mjolnir (comics) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Agent Carter (movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Frank Castle (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Maria Hill (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Sharon Carter (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Erik Selvig (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Ultron (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Howard Stark (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Wilson Fisk (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Vincent D'Onofrio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Carol Danvers (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Steve Rogers (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Nebula (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Groot (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Peggy Carter (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Ramonda (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

The RFD tag has been added to each and every page and both IP creators have been notified, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 13:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Steven1991 (talk) 12:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Agree with Nominator --Unclethepoter (talk) 13:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Onyeachonam Goodluck Chikwesiri

Onyeachonam Goodluck Chikwesiri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

92.90.252.230 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Mainly en:WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. Fails WP:N. 92.90.252.230 (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep- There are independent sources to meet notability. Onyeeze2024 (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC) 23:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Medieval history of Pakistan

Medieval history of Pakistan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CelesteQuill has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The Terminology "Pakistan" did not exist before 14 August 1947. This article pushes a nationalist view by trying to link Pakistan to medieval history, which is misleading. History should be presented based on facts, not modern political narratives. CelesteQuill (talk) 04:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete"Pakistan" as a term was first coined in 20th century and came into official usage after 1947. It wasn't used in Medieval era.— Preceding unsigned comment added by CelesteQuill (talk • contribs) 04:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Agree with the nominator, this is an attempt to introduce a nationalistic order that didn't exist before 1947. Shakib ul hassan talk! 08:48, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete per nominator rationale. NXcrypto Chatting 07:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete per nominatior. Raayaan9911 20:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete The proposer’s reasoning is valid. I agree with the option of deletion in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)23:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of Ror dynasties and states

List of Ror dynasties and states (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Durjan Singh Jadon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Original research, fail GNG and non reliable sources. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 10:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete per hoax (see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Ror dynasty) MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete The proposer is right. I agree with the option of deletion in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete The page is Hoax--Unclethepoter (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete: I would likely to agree with nominator, who admissibly noticed this for opinionated Conflict of Interest WP:COI 2409:40D6:E7:2291:CDE8:3CAF:ADE7:CA3D (talk)

This request is due to close on 01:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)23:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Katoch

Katoch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Durjan Singh Jadon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: this article stands on only single source with less information and created by an abusing person. You can see this user. This user abusing other users openly on most of the his edits. See these edits [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and one more abuse [17] edits by this ip abusing other people. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep This article has potential, especially since the topic is notable and already covered on the main English Wikipedia: [18]. If the page is being repeatedly targeted, you might want to consider requesting protection at WP:ANI to help prevent further disruptions. Shakib ul hassan talk! 18:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Strong delete: Sources are unreliable first sources is community's own website and second source is self-published (written and published by Rana Muhammad Sarwar Khan). Bensebgli ^(Talk) 03:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)23:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Durjan Singh Jadon

Chamar Koli

Chamar Koli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Durjan Singh Jadon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: original research, non notable sources not mention anything about Chamar Koli Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 10:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per non-notable, fail WP:GNG and Fringe theories. It was created by disruptive IP now blocked.[19] Bensebgli ^(Talk) 23:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nominators before search found nothing mentioning the subjectsOnyeeze2024 (talk) 00:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)23:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Barry Barnett

Barry Barnett (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2001:861:3F40:AEC0:85D1:8E68:9F23:432E has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable lawyer. There is literally no notability and the current page was spammed on Simple Wikipedia after rejection on the English Wikipedia, see en:Draft:Barry Barnett. A few mentions or quotes in the media are usually not enough to meet WP:N. 2001:861:3F40:AEC0:85D1:8E68:9F23:432E (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC) 23:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Deleted page

Template:Deleted page (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Enfcer has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This template makes no sense. If I am understanding this correctly. We would delete a page and then re-create the page with this template to let people know the page was deleted. Either way, not sure it fits most QD reasons, bringing this here for consensus. Enfcer (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nom. Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nom. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 22:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Per Nominator--Unclethepoter (talk) 13:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete pointless.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:58, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pyoras

Pyoras (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable, possibly a copyright violation? MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Siempre en las Nubes

Siempre en las Nubes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hamed Abbasi

Hamed Abbasi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: all sources directly state that they are promotional, except for one link which is a dead link MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep – The article on Hamed Abbasi is supported by multiple independent and non-trivial sources, including The Tribune India, Outlook India, DNA India, and The Telegraph India. These sources go beyond mere directory listings or brief mentions, providing substantial coverage about his career both in the arts and in industrial leadership. While some of these may be branded content, they still demonstrate a level of attention and coverage that satisfies WP:GNG (General Notability Guideline).

The article has also been edited to maintain a neutral, encyclopedic tone and avoid promotional language, in line with WP:NPOV and WP:V. It presents verifiable information about Mr. Abbasi’s acting career since 2010 and his executive roles in the Iranian manufacturing sector, making it relevant to readers interested in Iranian public figures.

Deletion would remove a developing article that is improving in quality and supported by third-party references. Further improvements are possible, but the subject passes notability requirements as they currently stand.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.124.67.17 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional page full of blatantly obvious sponsored articles and no actually good article. I removed much of the excessive fluff and what's left isn't enough to show this is a notable person. Ravensfire (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete It looks like a promotional article written by paid users. Steven1991 (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jean Fallacara

Jean Fallacara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Fallacara MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete, that is what i am leaning toward.--Not notable.--No mention at (mainspace in) en-wiki, in case anyone asks. 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:F93F:BC9F:48B6:19F (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Subtropical Storm 01L (2023)

Subtropical Storm 01L (2023) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable per en:WP:NWXTC, did not receive significant coverage MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-notable storm, minimal impacts on land. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Redirect to 2023 Atlantic hurricane season#Unnamed subtropical storm. Although, since there are no incoming links, I'd also be OK with deleting. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

  I agree with a redirect, this is probably the best option MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

PortaldeActualidad

PortaldeActualidad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: sources do not reference portaldeactualidad, not notable topic MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete, that is what i am leaning toward.--Not notable.--No mention at en-wiki, in case anyone asks. 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:F93F:BC9F:48B6:19F (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete non notable. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 22:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete: Spam by known SEO service IP from India, see https://spamcheck.toolforge.org/by-domain?q=portaldeactualidad.com. --Achim55 (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

TheDotBlog

TheDotBlog (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notale. none of these sources have anything to do with the article MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete: Spam by known SEO service IP from India, see https://spamcheck.toolforge.org/by-domain?q=thedotblog.com. --Achim55 (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Togetic

Togetic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Steven1991 (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Male characters in animated movies

Category:Male characters in animated movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Category:Male movie characters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Category:Female characters in movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Category:Female characters in animated movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: we generally do not categorize by gender MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 22:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete --Auntof6 (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shreyas Subramanian

Shreyas Subramanian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and the criteria at en:WP:NACADEMIC. Being a principal engineer is indeed quite impressive, but is not an indication of notability. The subject's work at AWS has not been widely reported on elsewhere. The author's publications (books, research articles) have the same problem. Hiàn (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Steven1991 (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete: agree with the nominator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:38, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Heka

Heka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable. Little to no reliable coverage in independent secondary sources. Only coverage outside of first-party sources are sponsored articles or press releases. Hiàn (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Deletion is the preferable option in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 23:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete as per non-notable. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 18:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mudkip

Mudkip (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, such sources are unreliable A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Deletion is the preferable option in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lucy Fletcher

Lucy Fletcher (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Selected, but did not join does not count as notability. She is listed briefly as a biography in source one, and source two is unrelated to the article. No significant coverage per en:WP:NSPORT MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 04:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:58, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:1200s establishments by continent

Category:1200s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

• Category:1190s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Category:1210s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

· close request MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: will likely not ever have three categories, requesting deletion so that child cats can be placed in 1200s establishments, not particularly sure the guideline for this MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 02:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nikki Mudarris

Nikki Mudarris (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unsourced blp MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Fails WP:N. 2001:861:3F40:AEC0:85D1:8E68:9F23:432E (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nominator. ⭐ Adelaide Do you have to say something? 17:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Unsourced article, no article on en wiki, most of the claims for notability seem to be tied to who they've dated and notability is not inherited. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete No Notability Found on News section --Unclethepoter (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NR7 Miner

NR7 Miner (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: sources do not support article, none of the sources that I looked up mention nr7 MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dennis Lockerty

Dennis Lockerty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Waya Boy

Waya Boy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Per w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waya Boy * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

What is your reason of deleting this page? I find no explanation but the page is fine. Musassejombwe (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete: per nominator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Deletion is the preferable option in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
• Comment: from the English Wiki, editors here may be concerned about cross-wiki abuse and may find more information at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan Merrony/Archive. Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:24, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Jellycraft

Jellycraft (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, i think there is no sources in this article. Raayaan9911 16:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Does not meet our notability requirements. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
• Please leave this article inside Joy manuel schuler01, (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable and unsourced. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 09:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Tamizhaga Vaazhvurimai Katchi

Tamizhaga Vaazhvurimai Katchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable party, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 15:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete: per nominator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Olo

Olo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: one source from a journal doesn't justify its existance MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. I mistakenly put in two quotes from one (authoritative) source. I have now added a bit more material and sources. I have also listed even more sources in the talk section to help any-one wanting to expand on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdammers (talk • contribs) 16:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hitbox

Hitbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: only reference is a reddit link MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Panama squad 2018 FIFA World Cup

Template:Panama squad 2018 FIFA World Cup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unused template MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not unused, but no blue links. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Concept of equality

Concept of equality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unwikified, not notable, perhaps redirect to equality? MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 12:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Redirect agree with nominator for the redirection part.--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete There are no incoming links, so a redirect wouldn't be helpful. It's also not a term we would want used in simple language. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:58, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

List of Rors

List of Rors (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Dhaj (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Mehla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
Template:Ror clans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: likely a hoax, see the other ongoing discussion and previous discussions. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 05:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

  @MrMeAndMrMe: Do you mean that you want these additional pages included in this RFD? If so, please list them above instead of in the discussion area. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete- Per the norms however its clearly violative for the the unsubstantiated topic concession which can only expected from a inter wiki sock intervener WP:Sock

This request is due to close on 05:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Consensus to delete.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Maximilian I Joseph: Descendants and Ancestry

Maximilian I Joseph: Descendants and Ancestry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable Descendants, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• To be fair in your opinion yes, you can delete the page.Priharisid (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Okay no worries unless someone !votes keep then it'll be deleted in 7 days or so, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep or merge with Maximilian I Joseph. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 20:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  None of the names here are mentioned at en:Maximilian I Joseph of Bavaria and everything here needs to be verifiable/sourced. –Davey2010^Talk 20:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  I don't think so content on English-wiki + simple wiki must be parallel. Reliable sources/verifiability matter. This article can be improved/merged instead of deletion. Thank you. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 21:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  "I don't think so content on English-wiki + simple wiki must be parallel." - Indeed, So how does this article match with en:Maximilian I Joseph of Bavaria ? (there is no en:Maximilian I Joseph: Descendants and Ancestry article.

  "Reliable sources/verifiability matter" - Indeed I agree - Please source it then.

  "This article can be improved/merged instead of deletion" - Again there's no evidence of any notability here but of course if you've found something I haven't please share it. And more important please source the article if you're able to do so. –Davey2010^Talk 22:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Davey2010 Matched here with this article [20]. This is relevant to this article. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 22:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  That's not the English Wikipedia article, Try again. –Davey2010^Talk 22:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Davey2010 I've voted for Keep or Merge. Not for what you're asking me to do. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 22:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  You've said Keep on the basis that the content must match the English Wikipedia and that the content must be sourced ..... Yet this article does neither; it doesn't match the EN article and it isn't adequately sourced..... You're entitled to your opinion but if you wish to be contradictory and wrong then that's fine too, Happy editing buddy. –Davey2010^Talk 22:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Davey2010 Buddy you are incorrect. I didn't said anything about English Wikipedia (en:Maximilian I Joseph of Bavaria).

  Here is the source code of my comment.

  Template:(Keep or merge with [[{Maximilian I Joseph}]]. I clearly asked to merge this with already existing article on Simple-wiki not En-wiki.Bensebgli ^(Talk) 23:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  If you say so, We're not having a Round 2 of this discussion and I'm not going to spend another hour of my time repeating myself over and over and over again. Admins will close based on the weight of discussions here and the notability established / sources provided, Happy editing. –Davey2010^Talk 23:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

  Sure! Happy editing my friend. Good night. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 23:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Descendants: Sometimes I question the notability of modern-day descendants of non-reigning royal houses. This is a lot of detail that not many people will care about. Ancestry: Let $n$ be the number of great- or grand- that prefixes a parent name (father or mother). Then a human being has $2^{n}$ biological great-$^{n}$parents. The maximum value of $n$ in that article is 10, which would require listing $2^{10}=1024$ people in it. Even if we're just talking about strict patrilineage, at some point it becomes less useful to list out a subject's ancestor ten generations back. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

• Here is why I put this page:

I usually was working on it of Maximilian I Joseph but it became too big so I transferred it to the page. Priharisid (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

There are 267 people in the descendants chart.

•  Delete The ancestry can be handled with an ahnentafel template in the biography article. For the descendants, it's customary to list a person's children in a biography article, sometimes with brief notes about their spouses and children, but any later generations go in articles about the descendants. Besides that, the formatting in this article leaves much to be desired. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete --Auntof6 (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Glitch Productions

Glitch Productions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable animation studio. Ternera (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Mostly because it exists on English Wikipedia 13+ other languages, they are "Notable" because they're the creators of both The Amazing Digital Circus and Murder Drones. You just don't understand what "Notable" actually means on Wikipedia}} QuantumFoam66 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

SMG4

SMG4 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Article sources are mostly from Fandom and Google does not return coverage. Ternera (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Steven1991 (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment: Notice that the creator of this article Cepven-dysqa8-jIwsav, has created about four other articles related to both SMG4 and Glitch Productions which include Sunset Paradise, Hobo Bros., Hitbox and Luke Lerdwichagul. The first two of which have not been nominated for deletion. (Edited since April, 22, 3:42 EST}} QuantumFoam66 (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

  Notice: The creator of this hasn't stopped there; as they are continuing create even more articles related to Glitch Prod/SMG4 such as GlitchX and SMG4 Movie: Meggy’s Destiny, the second one of which has over 20,000+ bytes in size and relies entirely on a single source from Fandom.com: a site that English Wikipedia any more others would never use as a source. The creator of these articles is perhaps only creating the articles on Simple English Wikipedia instead of English Wikipedia because I think you should already know why. Many Simple Wiki articles have no sources; but even most of those without sources are typically very short and try to avoid looking a dictionary definition. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirected to Glitch Productions --Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Luke Lerdwichagul

Luke Lerdwichagul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable person. Article has no sources and Google does not turn up results from reliable sources. Ternera (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Redirect to Glitch Productions per en. Note that author removed deletion template off the article. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Steven1991 (talk) 18:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:13, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Muhammad Umar Jabbar

Muhammad Umar Jabbar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 01:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:N. 2001:861:3F40:AEC0:85D1:8E68:9F23:432E (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Auntof6 (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Robert Krzysztofik

Robert Krzysztofik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: only sources are things that Krzysztofik wrote MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 00:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Auntof6 (talk) 05:11, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Davood Bagheri (Futsal Player)

Davood Bagheri (Futsal Player) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: possibly fails sport player notability MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 00:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Template:MySpace

Template:MySpace (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Absolutiva has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: MySpace does not belong to external links section per WP:ELNO. Absolutiva (talk) 11:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - there is probably only like a handful of reasonable uses to have a link to MySpace, nowhere near enough for a template to exist. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: Closing admin, please view the what links here section - there's about 50 items that'll need the template removing from. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete per en:Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_January_15#Template:Myspace. Under-used template for an under-used website. –Davey2010^Talk 11:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep It's used in many pages and it's useful there. Removing it from all pages would be as silly as removing Instagram links from all pages. TagUser (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

  @TagUser I've removed the template from articles, Some external link sections at the English Wikipedia still had MySpace listed, so here I replaced some with "[myspace.com/x X] on [[MySpace]]" where they were relevant (subjects were singers and not just actors),

  MySpace is useless now as any link you click - it shows a blank page with a list of songs on the right hand side - when a song is clicked it just brings up a popup embedded YouTube video for the song .... so there's nothing to be gained from sending our readers there as they gain no further knowledge or information that isn't already in the respective articles here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

  Like I said above, I can see a requirement for it on a very basic level in very limited circumstances, but it's easy enough to just write in, we don't need a dedicated template for something we should probably deprecate. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Strong delete I'm not agree with the rational of TagUser. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 21:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Il Fungo (Grigna) (2nd nomination)

• Il Fungo (Grigna) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Torrione Fiorelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Frankly, I'm very disappointed at the result of the previous RfD for the article about Il Fungo and Torrione Fiorelli that resulted in them being kept. The articles are obviously generated by an LLM that either did not know how to browse the internet or is poor at doing so. This RfD includes Torrione Fiorelli because of the similarity and the exact same set of references. This RfD does not concern the notability of the subjects. If information about them exists beyond simple statistical facts, they are assumed to be notable on the English Wikipedia.

An AI-generated article whose sources are completely hallucinated by the LLM is disastrous for the wiki, as it completely violates the principle of verifiability

Let's go through each source. They are the same for both articles.

1. ISBN 978-88-365-6325-7 does not return any hits on google. this ISBN visualizer gives a result for a completely different book. There's another book that seems to have a similar title but different ISBN and publication date: Guida dei monti d'Italia - Le Grigne. The fact the ISBN and metadata are different makes it difficult for me to trust that this is the correct source.
2. ISBN 978-88-87890-72-3 gives a completely different book when googling. Conveniently it's available from the Internet Archive. What does page 95 say? Nothing about the composition of the mountain. Page 103 is a photo, of a location that is unrelated to the Torrione Fiorelli (one's in Trento, the other's in Lombardy).
3. I cannot confirm that Italian Journal of Geology is a real journal. Googling gives other journals with similar names (Italian Journal of Geosciences, Italian journal of engineering geology and environment, etc), but nothing with this exact name. It could have been translated from an Italian name, if so, the evidence for this source existing should be given.
4. This link gives a 404 and as far as the wayback machine is concerned it has always been that way.
5. This one is a real source. You can read it on IA if you want. As far as I can tell it doesn't talk about either Il Fungo or Torrione Fiorreli
6. This one too, is real, at least from the author and title. The ISBN attached to it doesn't seem to exist though. It's not possible to check the contents of the book currently.
7. This doesn't exist, the domain has never existed as far as the Wayback machine is concerned.
8. ISBN 978-88-98609-82-3 seems to be a different book according to the ISBN visualizer. No exact match for the title either.
9. ISBN 978-88-99874-21-4 doesn't seem to exist. No exact match for the title either.
10. No ISBN given, no title matches
11. This doesn't exist, the domain has never existed as far as the Wayback machine is concerned.

If you consider !voting keep for one of the articles, or both, then at least come up with better references, because all of the references currently in both articles are unusable.

TL;DR: AI-slop with AI references. Rewrite or nuke it. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Pinging the registered participants of the previous two discussions: @Zjui3r:, @Eptalon:, @FusionSub:, @Lionsonny:, @Griffinofwales:, @Jlwoodwa:— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
• Hard Delete is what i am leaning toward.--Note to closing admin: Do not give this article a Get-Out-of-Jail Card, while any of the fake sources remain in the article. 2001:2020:8341:83A0:65B3:4D43:52EF:F0F3 (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. A redirect wouldn't be helpful at this point because there are no incoming links. Anyone who disagrees is welcome to recreate the page as a redirect. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

The Nether (minecraft)

The Nether (minecraft) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Ai generated article, see version history, not notable enough to have its separate page. Suggest redirecting to Minecraft or deleting. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I think a redirect could be a good idea. Ternera (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Redirect Agree with the option of Redirect. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 02:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Deletion is more appropriate in this case. Steven1991 (talk) 15:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

  What about recreation by anonymous IPs? in future. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 16:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Bensebgli WP:SALT. If there were to be recreations in the future, an administrator could protect this page from being recreated. Justjourney (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirect to Internet meme --Auntof6 (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Dead memes

Dead memes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pretty much someones personal opinion, Found personal lists of dead memes but nothing from news sites, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 10:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Redirect to main article Memes. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 02:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Redirect to main article Memes Raayaan9911 09:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 04:56, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Tarun Chugh

Tarun Chugh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Maybe be general secretary, but no forms of notability.  Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 10:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep: I had not finished editing the page before it was nominated for deletion. I wish the nominators had reviewed the page more carefully before nominating it. The subject is the National General Secretary of the largest political party in India, has received considerable media coverage and clearly meets the notability criteria since he served as a Minister in Punjab. Therefore, i strongly vote to Keep the page.--Vikrampasari (talk) 11:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

  You can continue improving the article during the discussion. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:08, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Tarun Chugh is a notable Indian politician and National General Secretary of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), one of the major political parties in India. The article can be improved with better sourcing, but the subject meets notability guidelines for politicians.--Bonny1987 (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep He served as General Secretary of the Bharatiya Janata Party ruling party in Indian since 2013-2014. He was government minister for Punjab state from 2009 to 2011. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 02:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

  Where did you verify this was accurate? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

  Through cited sources. And subject is notable per WP:POLITICIAN. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 19:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Bensebgli Which part of POLITICIAN does this pass as it would seem they fail all 4 criterias....., Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete as fails WP:POLITICIAN (#1, #2, #3 and #4)

(#1. Their role isn't an international, national or sub-national one)

(#2. They're not a member or former member of a national, state or provincial legislature)

(#3. They've not received any significant press coverage. (sources in the article and on Google News are LOCALCOVERAGE))

(#4. and lastly #4 states and I quote "Elected officials may have an article providing they meet the main guidelines of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article"" which quite clearly isn't the case here as everything's LOCALCOVERAGE.

Fails POLITICAN, SIGCOV and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Holding a ministerial position/Vice Chairman of the Punjab Youth Development Board in the Government of Punjab meets the criteria mentioned in #1 of WP:POLITICIAN. The subject appears to have been widely covered in the news. You can easily verify this yourself and I have already added a few references in another comment below that I was able to find. The cited news outlets include both national and regional publications. Hindi daily newspapers, such as Dainik Jagran, Dainik Bhaskar, Amar Ujala, which are referenced in the article, have large readerships and circulation. Vikrampasari (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep: Subject is notable. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I agree with the proposer. Not everyone needs to have a bio created on Wikipedia. Steven1991 (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment: For the reviewers, thoughts on if this person meets the WP:GNG notability guideline? I don't think they meet WP:NPOL as noted, and there isn't enough to show that they meet w:WP:NAUTHOR, but GNG is always there as an option, have they had enough good sources with significant coverage about them? Ravensfire (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

  Either I am misunderstanding Wikipedia's guidelines, or you are. He clearly meets criterion #1 of WP:POLITICIAN. During the government of Punjab under Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal, he served as the Vice Chairman of the Punjab Youth Development Board, a statewide position equivalent to that of a Cabinet/minister, from 2009 to 2012. He held ministerial-level responsibilities, having the Minister of State rank from 2009 to 2011. Since this was a statewide office, he meets the notability criteria for politicians. The references for the same have been cited. All the information is verifiable and I have focused only on his political career, excluding his other work or controversies. If anyone wishes to cover those, feel free to add those details.

  Please note, this ministerial position the subject had held way back in 2009. He is currently serving the second term as the General Secretary of BJP, world’s largest political party in terms of number of members. This is quite an influential and top-level position in a political party.

  I have researched and found that he has been widely covered in newspapers regarding his appointments, work and the controversies and statements he has been involved in. While I'm not entirely certain if this qualifies as 'significant media coverage,' I’m providing a few references for you to review.

  You can check [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and there are many more, which is not possible to add here. WP:GNG appears to be met. He fulfilled the criteria in #1 of WP:NPOL when he held a ministerial position. Vikrampasari (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

  Party positions are not the political positions considered for NPOL - that would be high-level national and some state positions - think national legislatures or cabinet level positions besides the obvious and generally those should have stand-alone articles. See w:Minister_of_State#Minor_government_ranks. Is being the Minister of State enough to meet NPOL? That's iffy. A key point to remember is that even if they are, it's merely PRESUMPTIVE of notability, not indicative. There should be substantial coverage of that person which would meet GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Auntof6 (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Id Software

Category:Id Software (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This category used to contain ID Software's games before a category for their games was created. Now it just contains the main topic and a subcategory QuantumFoam66 (talk) 00:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests