Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion[change source]
- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion[change source]
If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user[change source]
Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions[change source]
- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions[change source]
Template:Uw3[change source]
- Template:Uw3 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Already have this template Cactus spiky ouch 23:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Speedy keepNeutral this template is used in the other level-3 warning templates and deleting it would break those. —76.212.74.243 (talk) 23:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update: just checked Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Uw3. We actually only have two templates (Template:Uw-unsourced3 and Template:Uw-unsourced3) using this one, so we might be able to delete Uw3. On the other hand, enwiki uses their Uw3 template for almost every level-3 warning template. —76.212.74.243 (talk) 23:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Wally Gator[change source]
- Template:Wally Gator (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This unused navigational template has only one blue link in the body, so it can't do its job of navigation. Auntof6 (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Spanish Senate constituencies[change source]
- Template:Spanish Senate constituencies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This navigational template has no blue links in the body, so it can't do its job of navigation. Auntof6 (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category[change source]
- Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating the two unused templates and their doc pages, listed below. They are intended to be used as category headers for categories that contain Olympics-related sidebar templates, but we don't seem to have any of those.
The templates are not transcluded anywhere, but they may appear to be used because their doc pages link to each other as related templates.
- Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category
- Template:YYYY Summer Olympics events sidebars category/doc
- Template:YYYY Winter Olympics events sidebars category
- Template:YYYY Winter Olympics events sidebars category/doc
Auntof6 (talk) 20:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini[change source]
- Alexander Jackson Maier-Dlamini (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
192.83.149.205 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article seems to be mostly promotional, although there is some information about controversies, so it doesn't qualify for quick deletion as advertising. I can't find enough coverage in independent reliable sources for notability. Also, some of the references don't exist, or at least the links are broken and I can't find them. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: IP address that issued warning edit-protected, not allowing the article to be adjusted or to address the IP’s concerns. It’s fine as it is, needs citation cleanup. International news, professional acting, published works make notability. Intrying78 (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees[change source]
- Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating the UEFA Euro referees templates listed below for deletion, because they are unused navigational boxes with too few blue links in the body to do any navigation. (Each has either zero links or only one.) These templates were created between June and September 2023.
These templates are not transcluded anywhere, meaning that they aren't used as nav boxes. They are linked only by Template:UEFA European Championship templates. It looks like they are linked in other places but that is only because that template is transcluded by other templates.
- Template:1964 European Nations' Cup referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1968 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1972 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1976 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1984 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1988 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1992 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 1996 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 2012 referees
- Template:UEFA Euro 2016 referees
Auntof6 (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Wiki (software)[change source]
- Wiki (software) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has nothing to do with the title and is clearly some sort of school essay. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 16:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Yin Bo Rann[change source]
- Yin Bo Rann (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- pl keep this new article admin. 175.100.6.5 (talk) 09:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- why?--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- please explain Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- ..to provides accessible info about his achievements and contributions. admin Cactus🌵 <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- but it is not notable? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- in present it's not worldwide but notable in country side. dear admin Cactus🌵 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- if it is not notable worldwide, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Please read WP:GNG Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- can be have an article on simple wikipedia with the short bio. dear admin Cactus🌵 <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am not an admin, so I do not know. Let the closing administrator decide. Thanks. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cactus🌵 will be admin in future. 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thats kind of you. :) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- D wish u dear new Admin Cactus🌵 2024 and soon 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Let's see what other editors think of this article. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- if this article was deleted how can we chat later? dear Cactus🌵 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- click the 'spiky' button. it would bring you to my talk page. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Noted, Thanks for response and always support. Admin :D <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- (:D) see you soon. Good luck editing and if you want to create an account!!
- Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- my acc will name carrot ^.^ 555 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- admin Cactus🌵 i'll Carrot 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice name Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is made by block evasion (Special:CentralAuth/Yin_Boran), see Yin Boran. MathXplore (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Bruh Cactus spiky ouch 23:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Its fine Cactus spiky ouch 23:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Bruh Cactus spiky ouch 23:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is made by block evasion (Special:CentralAuth/Yin_Boran), see Yin Boran. MathXplore (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice name Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Noted, Thanks for response and always support. Admin :D <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- click the 'spiky' button. it would bring you to my talk page. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- if this article was deleted how can we chat later? dear Cactus🌵 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Let's see what other editors think of this article. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- D wish u dear new Admin Cactus🌵 2024 and soon 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thats kind of you. :) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cactus🌵 will be admin in future. 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am not an admin, so I do not know. Let the closing administrator decide. Thanks. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think the notability guidelines require a subject's notability to be worldwide. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- can be have an article on simple wikipedia with the short bio. dear admin Cactus🌵 <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- if it is not notable worldwide, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Please read WP:GNG Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- in present it's not worldwide but notable in country side. dear admin Cactus🌵 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- but it is not notable? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- ..to provides accessible info about his achievements and contributions. admin Cactus🌵 <3 175.100.6.5 (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- please explain Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- why?--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete When your only claims to notability is a farm in a notability-dispute and a silver play button, you really aren't notable.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete blatantly promotional article with no reliable sources and questionable notability. Ternera (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete Not relevant User.shanie6 (talk) 22:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
EmiTQM[change source]
Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the notability standard for musicians. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Hello! I appreciate your review of EmiTQM's page and understand your concern about notability. However, I believe EmiTQM meets the criteria for notability for musicians and notable individuals, especially considering his young age and the impact he has already achieved. I would like to present additional evidence to support this claim:
- Impact on digital platforms at a young age: EmiTQM's debut single, "Igual y me Pensaste," has gained significant success on platforms like Spotify and has been featured as the second song on a major radio station's Top 10 playlist in the northern region of Mexico. It's important to note that EmiTQM is achieving this at just 17 years old, demonstrating exceptional talent and potential.
- Media coverage: EmiTQM has received attention from various media outlets, not only recently for his music but also on a national level for his achievements as a fencer. I've attached a link to an article about his third-place win at the Mexican National Olympiad. (I understand this is not music-related, but it shows he has had media presence.) https://notired34parral.com/?p=17587
- Industry recognition: EmiTQM has received praise from music industry professionals, and I've attached a review of his first song as evidence. These professionals have recognized his talent and potential despite his young age.
- Future potential: Despite his short career, EmiTQM has shown exceptional talent as a singer, songwriter, and producer, especially considering his age. His ability to create moving music and connect with audiences on an emotional level suggests a promising future in the music industry. It's unfair to compare him to artists with longer careers at this early stage.
- I kindly request your reconsideration of this page. Thank you. 2806:2F0:3460:675:612A:A729:EAA4:FBEE (talk) 00:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I checked his debut single and... 1,945 plays on Spotify? You can hardly call that "Impact on digital platforms". Definitely fails notability as a musician. Longestview (talk) 05:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Wikipedia is not a place to help new artists gain traction in their career. Ternera (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Ternera,
- I understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, but rather a repository of information on public figures and their achievements. It's unfair to compare someone with a longer career to someone just starting out.
- While EmiTQM is a new artist, I believe his trajectory and achievements thus far warrant documentation on Wikipedia. He has already garnered significant attention on social media and streaming platforms, demonstrating a genuine public interest. Additionally, he has received media coverage from various outlets, indicating a growing recognition within the music industry. His athletic achievements, such as winning a bronze medal in fencing at the National Olympiad, further highlight his potential as a public figure.
- I believe that documenting EmiTQM's journey on Wikipedia, while adhering to the platform's guidelines of verifiability and neutrality, would contribute to a more comprehensive and inclusive record of emerging artists. It would also provide valuable information to those interested in learning more about this promising young talent. Magzznews (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
RanDada Farm[change source]
- RanDada Farm (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notable? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Comment: all the Ips, except creator, have only one edit which is this. --Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete - Advertising. Longestview (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I feel like there is promotional content.--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- keep 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think that, this article is a great place to learn about cattle farming. It's should be have a article on wiki with simple English and short sentence. 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is for having information, not teaching? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know sir, just cmt. It's just my thinking 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Its fine, lets see what the admin thinks. Thanks for your time Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Cactus🌵, I creator this article, should be keep it to increase higher communicate clearly and strongly with people who like cattle or animal pet. 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- okay Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks dear Cactus🌵 🤍❤ 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- okay Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Cactus🌵, I creator this article, should be keep it to increase higher communicate clearly and strongly with people who like cattle or animal pet. 27.109.114.13 (talk) 02:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Its fine, lets see what the admin thinks. Thanks for your time Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know sir, just cmt. It's just my thinking 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is for having information, not teaching? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think that, this article is a great place to learn about cattle farming. It's should be have a article on wiki with simple English and short sentence. 119.13.56.8 (talk) 02:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Should be keep this article admin it’s good for information and can edit for more in future. 😀😀 36.37.152.186 (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Would you mind explaining you opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep?: บทความนี้เป็นข้อมูลสั้นๆ เก็บไว้แก้ไขทีหลังครับ 117.20.117.103 (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please write in English. Would you mind explaining your opinion, thanks! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete Doesn't seem notable and even if it somehow is the page is 200% promotional.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- How do all these Ips know about this page though? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Judging by the similar formatting I'm willing to say it's either IP-hopping or meatpuppetry.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- How do all these Ips know about this page though? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I find it suspicious that so many IPs are showing up to request that the article be kept. Ternera (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete doesn't seem notable enough to have an article and also seems promotional. Ternera (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Tristan van der Vlis[change source]
- Tristan van der Vlis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Originally nominated as 'A4-not notable', this is about a 24-year old, who committed the en:Alphen aan den Rijn shopping mall shooting, in 2011. After shooting a few people, the perpetrator committed suicide. Personally, I think that committing a crime does not confer notability. As always, if we had the article about the shooting (we currenlry don't) we might consider keeping this in some form. As it needs discussion, I am bringing it here. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - not inherited notability, we should be careful not to give great prominence to perpetrators of crimes. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nominator and Lee Vilenski; people like this are not notable at all and, if I am being honest, they deserve to be forgotten. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 08:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete article has no reliable sources to show how this person is notable. Ternera (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Bobon Santoso[change source]
- Bobon Santoso (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Is this data less valid, even though he is a YouTuber with 16 million subscribers? if not notability is fine, I'm just expressing my opinion
This request is due to close on 03:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
HD 269112[change source]
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:WP:NASTRO --Ferien (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- On reviewing this further, I've realised there are many more of these articles than I initially expected (79 in total for those counting) and that more explanation should probably be added to this nomination statement. All of the above articles are articles that 1) are mass-created by the now-blocked IP, 47.186.42.50, 2) have no corresponding enwiki article (exc HD 269700 where it is a redirect) and 3) have very few online sources available making these clear failures of w:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete fails w:WP:NASTRO and I don't think all of these stars are important enough to warrant their own articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ternera (talk • contribs) 21:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. Wiki-notability has largely not been shown. 2001:2020:345:A57A:CCB8:F39D:CE66:9C82 (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC) / 2001:2020:345:A57A:CCB8:F39D:CE66:9C82 (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete all. Nearly all of these have a single source from something along the lines of "list of", "catelog of", etc. None of these show notability per gng or nastro. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 05:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete We are not the complete guide to all the planets, stars and moons. We are Wikipedia.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 05:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete as not really notable. The fact that the only sources we can find are lists/catalogs is because this is only notable for a list/catalog of space objects. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete certainly fails w:WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I cant see that articles like this are helpful. Rathfelder (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom and everyone above - fails w:WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Shouldn’t This be Quick Deleted for Little or no Meaning? Milanjan10 (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Niels Vernooy[change source]
- Niels Vernooy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is questionable at best. Ternera (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 15:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Montez Ford[change source]
- Montez Ford (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article has no reliable sources and notability is questionable. Ternera (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Might fail WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Jalal Dhafer Alloush[change source]
- Jalal Dhafer Alloush (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Mind giving a reason? @Cactusisme Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Notability issue Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why was this page deleted? What are the reasons for deleting it? When I searched for this person and indeed there are news articles talking about him and he has an audience and fame on social sites. I refuse the deletion request because I expect the deletion request from someone who hates this person and for a personal reason he requested the deletion Dheab9689 (talk) 03:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment moved to correct position. MathXplore (talk) 04:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete appears to fail WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete sources (using translation sites for non-english sources) don't seem to be enough for notability. Article creator is now sock blocked, so G5 could also be an option. Also see Jalal Alloush which is the same article by a different editor, also now sock blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 22:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete does not quite pass the notability guidelines. All what i can find are some introductions on his work, probably only notable for a single event? ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why was this page deleted? What are the reasons for deleting it? When I searched for this person and indeed there are news articles talking about him and he has an audience and fame on social sites. I refuse the deletion request because I expect the deletion request from someone who hates this person and for a personal reason he requested the deletion Dheab9689 (talk) 03:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrator note: CU requested (Special:Diff/9622695). MathXplore (talk) 04:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- it is not deleted, yet, it is a discussion. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Why was this page deleted? What are the reasons for deleting it? When I searched for this person and indeed there are news articles talking about him and he has an audience and fame on social sites. I refuse the deletion request because I expect the deletion request from someone who hates this person and for a personal reason he requested the deletion Dheab9689 (talk) 03:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Jalal Alloush[change source]
- Jalal Alloush (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete appears to fail WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 15:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate? Off a very brief skim, it looks like an advertisement, but sources do support it. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 17:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete sources (using translation sites for non-english sources) don't seem to be enough for notability. Article creator is now sock blocked, so G5 could also be an option. Also see Jalal Dhafer Alloush, which is the same article by a different now blocked sock. 22:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete - nothing in the article suggests they are notable. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable advertisement created by a sock. Not much more so say here. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToadetteEdit (talk • contribs)
This request is due to close on 08:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Lancen Gm[change source]
73.170.137.168 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The sources are not credible. I do not think this person is notable per WP:MUSIC. 73.170.137.168 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 18:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Gone Thursday[change source]
- Gone Thursday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
73.170.137.168 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The sources are not credible. I do not think this person is notable per WP:MUSIC. 73.170.137.168 (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete article looks promotional and sources are not reliable. Ternera (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep This article gives simple general information of the person and record label that is under Sony Music and The Orchard. Medelinezezie (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please note the requesting user has also been vandalizing other Wikipedia articles. Acting without an account as well. Acting aggressively only with opinion based actions and not properly researching or requesting correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medelinezezie (talk • contribs) 19:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Medelinezezie: I just nominated a few articles for deletion. That is not vandalism, it is following the rules here. And yes, if you have problems with my edits, you can make a note to an administrator at WP:AN. 73.170.137.168 (talk) 04:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You are also a vandal though? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 02:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please note the requesting user has also been vandalizing other Wikipedia articles. Acting without an account as well. Acting aggressively only with opinion based actions and not properly researching or requesting correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medelinezezie (talk • contribs) 19:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- You seem to be vandalizing a lot o Wikipedia pages as we been keeping track.
- Opinion based request are not a reason to go on every Wikipedia article and start vandalizing them. I will make note of this to the appointed administrator. Medelinezezie (talk) 19:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete looks to me it fails WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 07:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete as a musician that is not notable. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Disabled, Not Half a Human Being[change source]
- Disabled, Not Half a Human Being (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
זור987 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think that User:Dorian Gray Wild trying to promote this organization outside Israel. And this organization have no encyclopedic importance outside Israel, in contrast to its founder, Alex Fridman, and this isn't acceptable. The equivalent English Wikipedia article has been deleted with a purposed deletion because of my same reasons. זור987 (talk) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Dear Wikipedians, the discussion is about the page, not about me.
- In the English Wikipedia there is a page about Alex Fridman.
- I did not discuss the request for deletion of Disabled, Not Half a Human Being. Therefore, it was deleted.
- A request for a quick deletion has been submitted, and Fehufanga wrote: "There is no policy that prohibits users from writing articles about Israeli organizations".
- In the Simple Wikipedia, there is no page about Alex Fridman. It was also suggested to delete "Alex Fridman" in the English wikipedia, but it was declined.
- I am not a member of this association.
- The organization has raised the disability allowances of the disabled people in Israel, no matter which religion they had. It is written in the page: "Lobbying and legislation in the Israeli Knesset".
- Therefore it is recommended to keep the page. Dgw (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Although true that "There is no policy that prohibits users from writing articles about Israeli organizations" that is irrelevant. The question is whether the page is notable. As it is restricted to Israelis, I say it is not notable. All round the world there are people who are disabled. War may be one of the leading causes. As far as I know, all countries support injured people. What is strange or unusual about that? Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- We have plenty of articles about organisations bound to one country. Most activists and politicians confine their activities to their home country. That is not relevant to the question of whether they are notable. There seem to be 3 reasonably independent sources here. Fridman and the organisation he created seem to be notable. Rathfelder (talk) 19:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Although true that "There is no policy that prohibits users from writing articles about Israeli organizations" that is irrelevant. The question is whether the page is notable. As it is restricted to Israelis, I say it is not notable. All round the world there are people who are disabled. War may be one of the leading causes. As far as I know, all countries support injured people. What is strange or unusual about that? Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - it seems like no such article has been up for Deletion, at En-wiki. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Disabled,_Not_Half_a_Human_Being .--However, i can not see a clear case of the organisation being wiki-notable on simple-wiki. 2001:2020:341:D118:7D25:4D50:8B80:E9DA (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Macdonald-ross and Rathfelder for your replies.
- The organization raised the pension from NIS 2,342 ($660) to NIS 4,500 ($1,270). I added it to the page, with the relevant sources. It is also written in the page: "The organization was established in April 2016 [...] as a protest to the wear of the disability pension in Israel for more than 15 years."
- Whataboutism is not accepted in Wikipedia.Dgw (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 13:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Satkeer (Singer)[change source]
- Satkeer (Singer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Comment: I also think there is some promotional content, but not sure.--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete no sources, and written by an IP with no other edits. I would say to delete. Ternera (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete No sources, nothing in EN to support any of this, nothing to show they meet any notability standard. Ravensfire (talk) 02:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: article about a singer that doesn't have any source and is not notable. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Old Talk Notice (2nd nomination)[change source]
- Template:Old Talk Notice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Milanjan10 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unnessecary + Author’s Request, But im doing RfD to make sure if this is actually nessecary for the wiki or not Milanjan10 (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Is author wants deletion then QD--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I am pretty sure they want discussion, not immediate deletion. Also, this discussion should probably close since it already exists. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 19:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: oh, ok Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Old Talk Notice[change source]
- Template:Old Talk Notice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Template is pretty much identical to Template:Talk archive, and discourages future discussion of old topics that have been archived. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 07:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Comment: Also Per Author’s Request (aka me), But no Quick Deletion has been Performed to make sure if its Nessecary or not, See 2nd Nomination Milanjan10 (talk) 08:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete I don't see any reason for this template to exist.- FusionSub (Talk page)(Contributions) 10:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete pretty useless and maybe doing harm. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. The template is transcluded onto two pages only, and can be replaced in a reasonable amount of time. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
JULY 12, 2003 HBO SCHEDULE LINEUP (20th Century Fox Marathon of Movies)[change source]
- JULY 12, 2003 HBO SCHEDULE LINEUP (20th Century Fox Marathon of Movies) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 07:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Quick Delete, no basic claim to notability or sources that would vaguely indicate so (a4). Could also fall under G1. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 07:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete from my understanding, it does not meet any QD criteria but falls under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete IP that created it is blocked for "creating bad pages". That definitely is a bad page. Ternera (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: G5? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Cactusisme G5 Requires the person to be evading a block at the time of the articles creation to be valid, something that I can't find any proof of.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOT. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete useless; Wikipedia is not a TV guide. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 07:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Withdrawn. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[change source]
- Category:Australia FIFA Women's World Cup squad navigational boxes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Along with Category:Australia at the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, and Category:Australia at the FIFA Women's World Cup. Historically, SIWP does not gender categories, however as far as I know there is not a precident for gendered sports cats MrMeAndMrMeTalk 08:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Keep I am usually one of the main people wanting to eliminate gendered categories. However, there are exceptions for things where men and women are separated in real life. One example is acting awards where men and women are nominated separately (for example, separate awards for best actor and best actress). Other exceptions are sports-related. These categories should be exceptions because the are gender-specific by the very name "FIFA Women's World Cup". --Auntof6 (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Would you say that this applies to every sports-related category? Such as, Women Tennis Players would be a valid cat? Or only in these cases when there is a specific separate league. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 21:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Only in such cases, where the genders have separate leagues/teams/whatever. Also, by the way, the term according to WP:CATGENDER would be "female", not "women". -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. I withdraw this rfd (if that is possible) MrMeAndMrMeTalk 21:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Only in such cases, where the genders have separate leagues/teams/whatever. Also, by the way, the term according to WP:CATGENDER would be "female", not "women". -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Would you say that this applies to every sports-related category? Such as, Women Tennis Players would be a valid cat? Or only in these cases when there is a specific separate league. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 21:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep The women's world cup is a different competition than the men's world cup, so it wouldn't make sense to combine them. This is true regardless of whether female and male athletes are categorized separately in general. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 21:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 08:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Bayin Wu (artist)[change source]
- Bayin Wu (artist) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
136.152.209.67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet Notability standards. Please note that this was submitted to articles for creation on English Wikipedia and it was declined; see en:User talk:DawnXu777. 136.152.209.67 (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete fails WP:GNG--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Beal Crossing, Louisiana[change source]
- Beal Crossing, Louisiana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
136.152.209.67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: River crossing, not a community. Fails en:WP:GEOLAND and en:WP:GNG. Deleted on enwiki for this reason: en:Special:Redirect/logid/124952752. 136.152.209.67 (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Agree with nom, fails geoland criteria. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Beer Boys and Vodka Girls[change source]
- Beer Boys and Vodka Girls (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
136.152.209.67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This show is probably not notable enough for Wikipedia purposes. The sources don't seem too reliable, in fact they seem generally promotional. 136.152.209.67 (talk) 01:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete Out of the article's three sources, one of he websites is notable for intentionally spreading disinformation and is part of a fake news network. None of the sources claim notability, other than talking about the webcomic. Half of the article is unsourced. It was put into a draft in enwiki, and then deleted after inactivity. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete references don't support the article enough for it to have a page. Ternera (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 01:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. If someone wants to merge and needs the content, please ask at the admins' noticeboard. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
GB Sounds[change source]
Longestview has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG as a single item from a single video game. Longestview (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete This is the type of stuff you find on fan wikis, not wikipedia.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete notability issue (not notable)--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete because were not a pokemon fandom or something. Not every minor thing from a game is notable. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge as It mentions its a Pokémon exclusive, Shouldn’t we merge it with all pokemon games that Have this item along with DS Sounds? And if it isnt notable enough, shouldn’t we just Make a small subheading or put in a Easter egg subheading, if any? Milanjan10 (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge because this contains a lot of information about the item. Somebody can remove some content and modify it for Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver. Amogh Tripathi (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Redirected --Auntof6 (talk) 21:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
List of programmes broadcast by Dangal TV[change source]
- List of programmes broadcast by Dangal TV (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not much content Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Comment: Very bright also--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed it Milanjan10 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect To Dangal (TV channel)
- Moved into the proper section. Goldenbluesoul please put comments in the discussion section above the discussion footer and remember to sign your comments.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect as Dangal already has a Program List in the article. Milanjan10 (talk) 08:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, The Program list in this article is IDENTICAL to that of Dangal (TV channel). Milanjan10 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect Ignoring the fact that I just went blind due to the formatting and colour choices, I agree with Milanjan10's reasoning for redirecting the page to Dangal (TV channel).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed it Milanjan10 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: maybe change the colour scheme--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Milanjan10 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- that looks better, thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 07:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Milanjan10 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Merged, but redirected to other article instead of deleting because there are incoming links to this one. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
NA-102 Faisalabad VIII[change source]
- NA-102 Faisalabad VIII (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Merge with NA-102 Faisalabad-VIII. They seem to be the same thing. Rathfelder (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 15:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Consensus is to merge, so keep at least until that is done. I leave it to interested/knowledgeable parties (pinging @Rathfelder and Cactusisme:) to do the appropriate merge. Then I would recommend redirecting this page, but it could be deleted if people really want that because there are no meaningful incoming links. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
FNCS[change source]
Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Should merge into Fortnite Battle Royale Rathfelder (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Merge with Fortnite Battle Royale--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 04:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. RFD withdrawn after rewrite. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Bohr radius[change source]
- Bohr radius (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-simple likely AI generated un-encyclopedic content Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 12:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete definitely AI generated content. Ternera (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to say so, I am not a physicist, and haven't heard of the concept beforehand. Nevertheless, I took like half an hour to an hour of my time to reqwrite the article. No, the formulas aren't in yet, they are likely not relevant at the moment, or they can be added later. In short: I think the article is keepable now. --Eptalon (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I withdraw this nomination. @Eptalon Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep simplified and rewritten by Eptalon--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Quick keep It has been rewritten, and the nomination was withdrawn. 2607:F140:6000:802A:FDB7:C795:7706:492 (talk) 00:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages[change source]
- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests