Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Category:Child actresses in English television

Category:Child actresses in English television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Child actresses in English cinema (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Male child actors in English television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Male child actors in English cinema (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:child male actors in English television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:child male actors in English cinema (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:International english language by Film & Television actors and actresses (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:CATGENDER MathXplore (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pickaxe

Pickaxe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pickaxes aren't mentioned in the axe article, and we should have a separate article here instead of this redirect. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep They may not be mentioned, and yes, it would be better to either mention them at Axe or have a separate article. However, there are incoming links, and a pickaxe is an axe so Axe will at least give some information. They don't have to be mentioned to have the redirect. It also would have been very little effort -- even less than creating this RFD -- to just add a brief mention in the existing article. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ali Orokzai

Ali Orokzai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other Please check If I am not wrong. Ksy 12:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

World Flags

World Flags (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:D5:B5:12E3:A4BA has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think that this article is useful. You'll never be able to list every flag on a single page, and the current collection isn't limited to national flags, so I don't know what the criteria are. 2601:644:907E:A70:D5:B5:12E3:A4BA (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nazi songs

Nazi songs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Absolutiva has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article for more than 12 years. Absolutiva (talk) 06:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep, that is what i am leaning toward.--I added one source.--RfD is not for cleanup ( and there is an En-wiki article, if anyone cares). 2001:2020:305:CA83:39FC:C5E7:F9D6:BF97 (talk) 07:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, since English Wiki has more citations. Lionsonny (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Keenan Dunham

Keenan Dunham (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Political candidate that does not show notability. 2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Keka HR

Keka HR (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The sources are promotional. I can't find independent coverage for the subject, so it seems to fail WP:NCORP. 2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Matt Peters

Matt Peters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, there's a bunch of sources, but none of them seem to be independent so the subject fails WP:GNG.

"Matthew Peters is an entrepreneur and expert in SEO and PR, known as the founder and CEO of Search Manipulator, an online reputation management company."

See also: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Search Manipulator. 2601:644:907E:A70:9598:9FC5:940:A0EB (talk) 04:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:59, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Actresses in English cinema

Category:Actresses in English cinema (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Actresses in English television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Male actors in English cinema (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Male actors in English television (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:CATGENDER MathXplore (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete, in fact, I might have just taken care of these without a discussion. Move the contents to appropriate categories if needed, but be aware that these categories are for actors in the English media, whether or not the actors are English themselves. That means we can't just move the contents to something like "English movie actors" or "English television actors". (I didn't check them all, but there's at least one that isn't English.) --Auntof6 (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Liam Hennessy

Liam Hennessy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Florentyna has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non notable, co-authorship in book only mentioned as thank Florentyna (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Darius Cheskin

Darius Cheskin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability about subject Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 11:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Per nominatior Raayaan 9911 11:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:03, 19 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chris Mustapha Nwaokobia Jnr

Chris Mustapha Nwaokobia Jnr (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Human rights activist but search goes to social media only. BigKrow (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Wait - I have asked for this to be reviewed on the talk page of the article. Searches of him on the internet might only show up social media sites, but the references added to the article indicate he's received independent press coverage - including national newspapers, and Nigerian television. If he wasn't notable for his views and his work, I doubt they'd have bothered to provide that coverage of him. If the wait template I've added, and the note here don't help, then I'll deal with that when we come to it. DaneGeld (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DaneGeld: The wait template is for quick deletions. It doesn't apply to RFDs. In any case, the qd and wait templates have both been removed from the article, so we can just focus on this RFD. -- -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I put wait on both locations (the article, and here) because I wanted to note the information I'd seen in the article from the references, and ensure that the creator of the RFD and the QD request were aware. The notes from the wait were put on its talk page, and are still there. Should I leave that information there? DaneGeld (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DaneGeld: Yes, you can leave it there. However, if you want people to consider it for this RFD, it should be here, too. People aren't going to read that talk page when looking at this RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6: I've copied the notes I put on the talk page, and I am going to amend my vote. Since Wait isn't an option, I will change it to a Keep vote. It needs a lot of work, but it could be a useful article. Thanks. DaneGeld (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A web search may only go to social media, but the references on the article clearly indicate that this guy has some prominent standing within Nigeria. He has coverage in Nigerian Newspapers, and has been referenced and covered by AIT News. He has an entry in the Biographical Legacy and Research Foundation's guide, as he was a presidential candidate in Nigeria in the 2011 elections.
He obviously has some weight - and whilst the article reads more like a CV than an article, and could do with some tidying up and links to personal info, it shouldn't be deleted. If he wasn't notable enough to speak about the subject to the national press and independent television services, then I doubt they would have given him the independent media and press coverage to air his views and opinions. DaneGeld (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

WikiIndex

WikiIndex (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non Notable Topic Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 13:19, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete doesn't seem to be notable enough for an article - there is not much online about it. Ternera (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:19, 18 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vinayak Singh

Vinayak Singh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2607:F140:6000:806A:F8D4:320A:9047:B16A has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Because this person's family is rich, that makes him notable? 2607:F140:6000:806A:F8D4:320A:9047:B16A (talk) 03:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Just only advertisement of subject --Ksy 04:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Removed IMDB and a fandom wiki used as sources. Removed a source from 1980 as not relevent since this is about someone born in 2006! Remaining sources are self-published "books" and a self-published article. Nothing to show how WP:NBIO let along WP:GNG is met here. Ravensfire (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

El Septimo

El Septimo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and page is like advertainment of Company other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 03:52, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Kuskrey This page already exists in multiple verified Wikipedia editions, including Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Standard English, indicating that the subject meets Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines. El Septimo is a widely recognized brand with significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. I have revised the article to ensure a neutral tone and removed any promotional language. Please reconsider the deletion, as the content now adheres to Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. Jagten (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MBBS in Uzbekistan

MBBS in Uzbekistan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adelaideslement8723 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possibly generated by AI, has no sources, and probably fails notability and NPOV 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 14:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete AI article, I think i tagged QD before RfD. Raayaan 9911 14:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:(Non-administrator observation) Yeah, that is what I think too, the article in general is generated by AI. It has been QD before but FusionSub declined it, so I RFD it. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 14:15, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if it were rewritten without AI, it's also promotional and violates WP:NPOV. The purpose of this essay is to convince Indian students to go to medical school in Uzbekistan. 2607:F140:6000:806A:F8D4:320A:9047:B16A (talk) 03:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:12, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Church of the Holy Sepulchre

Church of the Holy Sepulchre (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adelaideslement8723 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Largely generated by AI, no sources, and fails NPOV and Notability, possible GNG there too. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 14:06, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Per nom Zjui3r (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's true that it's considered one of the holiest sites in Christianity, so it's definitely notable, but as it's AI generated, with all the problems that brings, it should just be deleted. 2601:644:907E:A70:F0BA:E494:5A58:3122 (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Operation Martyr Helmet

Operation Martyr Helmet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 11:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Weak delete This is a pretty close paraphrase to [1] which is a press release. So right now, this article is basically a press release for a militant group. I'm highly suspicious of such sources, and putting excessive detail in Wikipedia's voice based on such a source makes for a poor article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
According to you, many of the Wikipedia war articles are wrong and exaggerated because the evidence of many wars is like this 185.244.154.187 (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Find good sources for it and I'm all for keeping it. Use press releases from one side, and the IP range with a strong POV doing this over and over and this is just a POV push that quite honestly this Wikipedia site cannot stop. Which is why it's being done here and not on EN wiki. Ravensfire (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It may not warrant deletion if there are specialised users able to rewrite it insofar as it meets the quality standard of this site. Steven1991 (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Il Fungo (Grigna)

Il Fungo (Grigna) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jlwoodwa has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think this was made by an AI. The references and external links do not exist, and were probably hallucinated. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep It is probably a translation of it:Il Fungo (Grigne) Zjui3r (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete is what i am leaning toward.--The non-real references (as alleged), that would be a bad thing. 2001:2020:311:EBBF:D05:EAAB:FF55:27F9 (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Torrione Fiorelli

Torrione Fiorelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jlwoodwa has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think this was made by an AI. The references and external links do not exist, and were probably hallucinated. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Santa Maria Sopra Olcio (Lake Como)

Santa Maria Sopra Olcio (Lake Como) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jlwoodwa has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think this was made by an AI. The references and external links do not exist, and were probably hallucinated. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete is what i am leaning toward.--The non-real references (as alleged), that would be a bad thing. 2001:2020:311:EBBF:75D8:2B2C:1E19:DBD0 (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deepta Roy Chakraverti

Deepta Roy Chakraverti (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Just a promotion of Subject Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 07:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete The proposer’s claim is reasonable. The article does not seem to show sufficient notability. Steven1991 (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 07:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sashin Govender

Sashin Govender (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A70:E9A4:2731:797D:565 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm skeptical about this person's notability. Some of the claims, such as "Forbes Africa 30 Under 30", don't seem verifiable in other sources. And I'm unsure if any of these sources are reliable. 2601:644:907E:A70:E9A4:2731:797D:565 (talk) 01:43, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete I agree with the proposer. The article does not seem to show notability insofar as it warrants an individual article on this site. Steven1991 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 01:43, 16 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lettters with a Sh sound

Lettters with a Sh sound (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

76.212.74.243 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't feel like this page should be kept in Wikipedia, but I'm not sure it can be quickly deleted. The only source in the article is the English Wikipedia. However, there is no similar article there. An internet search for the article title reveals only resources on phonics for small children and resources for language learning, but never anything that lists what letters make the "sh" sound in many languages. 76.212.74.243 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gregory (Five Nights at Freddy's)

Gregory (Five Nights at Freddy's) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This character is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Per nominatior. Raayaan 9911 07:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Khwakurk

Battle of Khwakurk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources seem promotional kurdshop, and some biography of someone. BigKrow (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I personally feel like this is a very lazy nomination. Bad references were used, however can't they just easily be replaced with something else? And this seems to be the editor's first ever page. Setergh (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added more sources+there are videos on this battle and books about the battle Rmsyz (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also to add on to the biography yes i did use a biography but the biography of that person was the former president of the Kurdistan Region and he had participated in that battle, if you search up داستانی خواکورک it will give you enough information about the battle and even pictures,videos about the battle and the soldiers in the Khwakurk area Rmsyz (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chenab Times Foundation

Chenab Times Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep: The article is available for various sister wikipedia. I found that it was created in 2023 on Kashmiri Wikipedia. While multiple citations looks good and reliable which means it is significantly covered and notable.Uniperplex (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, advertising article. BZPN (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep covered in multiple sources independent of the subject. Seems notable to me and passes RS. fr33k man 01:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - There's some poor sources in the article - press releases, a couple of the sites feel iffy from reading their "About us" page, and several sources have a byline like "JK Monitor News Network", or no byline at all [2], which is a flag for churnalism or w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA. [3] and [4] feels like solid sources with significant coverage (especially the second), although those are about a news account by Chenab Times, not the Foundation. So not as helpful as at first glance. A couple of other sources likewise focus on Chenab Times news group, with a passing mention, at best, of the Foundation. Overall, I'm not seeing quality sources with significant coverage of the Foundation. I see churnalism and puff pieces, passing mentions or coverage of the Chenai Times news company. Ravensfire (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Maryam Begum

Maryam Begum (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Self Published& Same subject Name on English Wiki is Different Person Other Please Check If I am not wrong Ksy 15:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep or Rename: Having the same name as another article on the English Wikipedia does not mean this topic is ineligible for an article. The individual is notable, but I believe this article should be renamed to Maryam Begum (CTF) or something more appropriate in accordance with Wikipedia's naming policies. The citations on the Simple English and Urdu Wikipedia pages about this individual establish notability.VandikaRai (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources focus mostly on Chenab Times Foundation, not on Maryam Begum, which is what's needed for an article on that person. I'm not seeing anything with the significant coverage needed to show notability for Begum. Ravensfire (talk) 04:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The subjects article at urwiki is also at the wiki's equivalent of RfD.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:14, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:55, 12 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khujoweb

Khujoweb (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: New website, sources are short announcements, not in-depth coverage. It's w:WP:TOOSOON for an article now. Ravensfire (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete agree Not Notable--Ksy 16:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable enough for an article - searching for it using search engines returns no results. Ternera (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are saying wrong, It is workable for only Bengali language. BritishGhost (talk) 04:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable web search engine for Bangladesh.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BritishGhost (talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The notability of the article does not seem to be sufficient. Steven1991 (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. While no formal !votes were cast, both Comment:s agree that the subject passes the relevant notability criteria. The state of the article can be discussed at a more appropriate place.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fernanda Valadez

Fernanda Valadez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is Just a Promotional and No Notability Other Please Check if I am not wrong. Ksy 16:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Comment Significant parts of this are unsourced and probably should be removed until sourced. This article is in draft on enwiki and in part it's because of the unsourced material. Valadez does seem to meet WP:NCREATIVE with several significant films that have reviews from reputable sources. Ravensfire (talk) 05:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment "She is notable because she played a major role in co-creating, a significant work, that has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." perhaps you could state what you think is "promotional" about a list of works and awards? then we could edit that. --Sundanceromance (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:05, 12 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Kumar (voice actor)

Harsh Kumar (voice actor) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable article, i think it's not good sources. Raayaan 9911 12:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This is a notable person. Please check the given links and his IMDB page. Harnessed2346 (talk) 12:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
IMDb is primary sources, Your article is non-notable because not published in many reliable sources, but i nominated your article in RfD. Raayaan 9911 12:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Basically, IMDb is user-generated and is not regarded as a reliable source as per Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. Need more independent sources.--Pot2156 (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Need to have several reliable sources with significant coverage of this person to show notability, and that's just in the article or found after a web search. w:WP:TOOSOON right now for an article. Ravensfire (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. G4'd by Griffinofwales- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

J Star

J Star (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable; closely related to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/JFO Star, Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/JFO Star, and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/John Fred Ogbonnaya. ⯎ Aster alee ⯎ 23:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete BigKrow (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thier is a english wikipedia article here Amandachapin (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should be Nominated QD with G11 --Ksy 11:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I will say the subject has already been deleted before (as nom said) so anything about a Virginian TikTok-er born in 2010 that holds a Guinness World Record for shortest time reaching the 100K views threshold could (and probably should) be tagged with G4 in the future as they cover a subject previously deleted on at RfD on multiple occassions.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohini Mohan Dhar

Mohini Mohan Dhar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notable? en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohini Mohan Dhar Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 07:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete The good sources are really focused on someone else and lack significant coverage of this person. Ravensfire (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 07:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uma Dhar

Uma Dhar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 07:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete nothing to show that WP:NPROF is being met. Ravensfire (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 07:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation of Erbil and Kirkuk

Liberation of Erbil and Kirkuk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Event that is a redirect to Kosrat Rasul Ali on enwiki, minimal sources here after non-reliable sources removed, this isn't even a stub unfortunately. Ravensfire (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete very slight passing mention in the source and only for a single event. fr33k man 01:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raid on Rome

Raid on Rome (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The content appears to be AI generated and lacks quality. The title, 'Raid on Rome,' does not fit well. Additionally, the article is unsourced and seems to be a complete hoax. Shakib ul hassan talk! 19:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete agree with Nominator--Ksy 19:47, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Fishback

James Fishback (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional Content and no Notability Other Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Per nominatior Raayaan 9911 08:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:10, 12 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trupti Satpathy

Trupti Satpathy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability, No Direct link for subject Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 15:49, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Notability is not inherited, sources do not have significant coverage of this person. Ravensfire (talk) 03:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:49, 12 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD A4 fr33k man 01:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Love

John Love (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

174.160.82.127 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject is the owner of a restaurant (Red Rocks Cafe in Charlotte, North Carolina) and does not seem notable. 174.160.82.127 (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD G11, fr33k man 01:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caseoh

Caseoh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zjui3r has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research, Zjui3r (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete It does not seem to meet the quality standard. Deletion not objected. Steven1991 (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Page should be nominated in Quick Deletion G11 Obvious advertising--Ksy 03:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. Ternera (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. After review of the arguments, the comments for keeping the article mostly had to do with the news stories and publicity related to the death of the person, rather than any Wikipedia guideline. On the other hand, many of the comments supporting deletion provided valid policy and guideline-based arguments on why the article should be deleted. This deletion applies to the subject of the article, his death, and any other closely related subjects. If, in the future, there are valid reasons per Wikipedia guidelines to restore the article, a deletion review should be opened. Best, -Griff (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nautica Malone

Nautica Malone (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability, i know there are sources but doesn't seem encyclopedic enough. Thank you. BigKrow (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia editors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus is made by discussing with arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to join the discussion and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts or canvassed users may be tagged using: {{subst:spa|username}} or {{subst:canvassed|username}}

Want to share that this recently published Vice Article "Is Porn Destroying Us?" discussed Malone and that is what led me to this Wikipedia.

Alas, Google results for Nautica Malone are populated by news of his death - with or without the wiki article.

With the long term effects of pornography and gooning unknown, Malone is a subject of impacts from gooning, pornography and masturbation.

The Wikipedia article for Malone is about the incident of his death as it seems this is what he is most known for.

Personally, not sure if I'd vote for or against but would like to contribute to the discussion. Blueishbeaver (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: This comment is the user's only edit on this wiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to stay up because it highlights how porn can truly affect the human psyche. 2601:406:4200:3F90:7DE9:9C08:B528:F8BA (talk) 07:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: This comment is the IP's only edit on this wiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wp articles dont get published because they're lessons to be learned. nearly every non-notable event can be taken as a lesson in some way TSF.Wikipedia 14:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Delete. This meets the general notability guideline, but per en:Wikipedia:Notability (events), neither the person nor his suicide has any lasting historical significance. 205.154.244.130 (talk) 23:33, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article is imperative for people to understand how the internet and its communities has led to people committing suicide. Chlpr (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: This comment is the user's only edit on this wiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Get off my SCHMEAT 134.173.108.190 (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree with your statement about the importance of this article. I understand that the subject matter of this article may be sensitive, but it is integral to create a place where uncomfortable topics can be shared in order for people to better grasp the dangers of engaging in public indecency. 一樣月光 (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
that isn't what wikipedia is for though, this doesn't make it notable. once again, every small non-notable daily occurrence can teach a lesson TSF.Wikipedia 14:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete It's interesting that most of the sources in the article are outside of the country where this event happened. A suicide, while tragic, if generally not going to be notable by itself. There's clearly been some trolling around this, and probably some nonsense from various forums that delight in mocking others. w:WP:ONEEVENT has some excellent advice that's relevant here and supports deleting the article. Ravensfire (talk) 02:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article on enwiki went through the AFD process there w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Nautica Malone where it was quickly closed as deleted for both the large number of delete comments as well as "serious WP:BLP (w:WP:BDP, w:WP:BLPCRIME, WP:BIO1E) concerns alongside blatant w:WP:NOTNEWS failures Ravensfire (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

we need this article to stay because this tragedy has made a great impact on the social and online culture of many people, destroying this article would be destroying my culture... RIP Nautica Malone, fly high goon lord. <3 xoxoxoxo Dasaggyballsman (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Regardless of the intent behind its creation, the page presents factual details that could be relevant in discussions about pornography abuse/addiction, its impact on individuals, and how these cases are perceived in media and society. FakeFrosty (talk) 03:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: This comment is the user's only edit on this wiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep what FakeFrosty said Rorr404 (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article most probably falls under WP:VICTIM.Pot2156 (talk) 08:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. its notable all the sources are reliable and i think the article should be up. ripgooner (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Username suggests they are a one-purpose-only or possibly a vandalism-only account. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 23:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: This user's only edits on this wiki have been to this RFD and the article it discusses. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you ripgooner, very cool TSF.Wikipedia 14:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Keep It should be kept if notable or not notable that how it is effecting the people mind --Ksy 19:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I request the article should be also improved --Ksy 19:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per en:WP:VICTIM. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 23:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I want to add that this man is not notable per en:WP:BLP1E. Many criminals killed themselves out of shame or fear of repercussion, it's nothing new or special. The only difference is that it usually happens behind the bars, so you don't see it and it doesn't make it to the news. Not notable at all, just a target for trolls and such. Also, there's a clear canvassing problem here. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 23:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This. Exactly this. There's a push here for memes and some troll boards and it's why en wiki closed their deletion discussion several days ago to avoid feeding the trolls. They're now getting fat and happy with the mess here. Ravensfire (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They don't have a job, so this is the only way they get to eat. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 23:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to add that this is recentism. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 10:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'll be honest, the article serves as an example that bad people will reap what they sow. --MrCarter-M (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: This comment is the user's only edit on this wiki. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a place for people to be taught examples of what happens someone mentally ill decides to jork it at a bikini café drive-thru TSF.Wikipedia 14:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Comment: "Nautica Malone" was by far the most viewed article and the second most viewed page on Simple English Wikipedia yesterday, with 11,745 pageviews, only slightly behind Main Page. 192.83.149.205 (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Dream Indigo. ⯎ Aster alee ⯎ 20:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is currently an off-wiki thread to raid this RfD. --Leonidlednev (talk) 08:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Leonidlednev where? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 08:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An imageboard that is obsessed with soyjaks. --Leonidlednev (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which is? The link? Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 08:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The users of that imageboard harass others, so it is best not to put the link out here. --Leonidlednev (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, alright Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ツ 09:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh god is it the party CharmanderTheDev (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter and other social media is a lot worse. MrCarter-M (talk) 11:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We've got articles for other seeming viral nonsense, considering this was a genuine living person with some pretty uncommon circumstances and temporary vitality/notoriety, it seems worth cataloging. The guy's been all over news sites for this cycle, hence the sources. CharmanderTheDev (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: This user's only edits here have been to this RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article meets the WP:NOTE requirements. It can be improved if flawed. Deletion is not always the solution. Steven1991 (talk) 04:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep same as Steven1991 CassiJevenn (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article should be deleted because it fails multiple core Wikipedia policies. Malone is only notable for his public suicide, which violates WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTNEWS—Wikipedia isn’t the place to document single, tragic events, especially when there’s no lasting significance beyond the news cycle. Reliable, independent coverage about Malone’s life outside this one event is also nonexistent, making the article heavily reliant on questionable sources like TMZ and Twitter. On top of that, this page has clearly become a target for trolling and mockery, as seen here and in the English Wikipedia discussion, where it was already deleted. Keeping it risks further harm to his family and contradicts WP:CRIME and WP:NOTHARASS. Arguments for keeping the article because of its relevance to internet culture or pornography are speculative at best—those topics can be addressed without sensationalizing someone’s death. Overall, this article doesn’t meet notability standards, it perpetuates trolling, and it lacks encyclopedic value. Deletion is the best move here.. LJF2019 (talk) 03:31, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability for a single event. As an aside there is confirmed sock puppetry and probable meat puppetry going on on this page. fr33k man 02:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed BigKrow (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP We need to educate ourselves on the goon lord in order to better understand what could drive someone to do that, the argument that because this was the only thing he accomplished in his life and as such we should not keep the wiki page is flawed because many people have only contributed to the world in one way before dying. The fact that this was a significant cultural event makes the argument to keep even stronger. Many people have only done one significant thing in their life and have gotten recognized for it, and in this day and age with the internet more and more people are seeing the goon lord, so it is important to recognize these events to prevent them from happening in the future.
1. ICANTGOON 207.235.150.241 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looking at WP:CRIM, this definitely does not meet any of the requirements - memes die out all the time, and this is nowhere near notable enough, nor has he been documented anywhere near enough outside of this one specific event. Plus, it fails WP:NOTHARASS, WP:NOTNEWS, and several other WP standards. Until the day that he is used as an emblem for mental health awareness for hyper-sexuality, or the effects of pornography, or something of that nature, delete. Goon in peace, Nautica. (guys why isnt my signature signing properly or is that just on my screen) TSF.Wikipedia 14:24, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
Wikipedia:Deletion policy
Wikipedia:Quick deletion
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Category:Deletion requests
Category:Quick deletion requests